Re: [VOTE] Grandfathering forgotten Geode contributors
+1 On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:37 AM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 5:03 PM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: If you hold a public vote to make them committers, they are not on the PPMC. If you hold a private vote, likewise. If you hold a vote to make them committers as well as PPMC members, and send the new list of PPMC members to the IPMC as lazy concensus of the roster change, then they become both. I'd like to see that happen. These words matter in voting, and we might as well get them right every time a new committer and/or [P]PMC member is suggested. [I realize this contradicts my early comments about treating people-votes, any committee-change vote with active consensus and unanimity. The IPMC or the Board (for incubating and top-level projects, respectively) do not pretend to know all of the committers to our project, unlike the project's committee members, and those names are brought up for passive approval entirely only for reporting and a bit extra scrutiny. They realistically won't be contradicted unless someone has some seriously negative karma that the IPMC or Board are aware of, but the IPMC and Board aren't expected to '+1' each person they don't know of.]
Re: [VOTE] Grandfathering forgotten Geode contributors
+1 for Mike. On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 at 05:33 Hemant Bhanawat hbhana...@pivotal.io wrote: +1 On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:37 AM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 5:03 PM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: If you hold a public vote to make them committers, they are not on the PPMC. If you hold a private vote, likewise. If you hold a vote to make them committers as well as PPMC members, and send the new list of PPMC members to the IPMC as lazy concensus of the roster change, then they become both. I'd like to see that happen. These words matter in voting, and we might as well get them right every time a new committer and/or [P]PMC member is suggested. [I realize this contradicts my early comments about treating people-votes, any committee-change vote with active consensus and unanimity. The IPMC or the Board (for incubating and top-level projects, respectively) do not pretend to know all of the committers to our project, unlike the project's committee members, and those names are brought up for passive approval entirely only for reporting and a bit extra scrutiny. They realistically won't be contradicted unless someone has some seriously negative karma that the IPMC or Board are aware of, but the IPMC and Board aren't expected to '+1' each person they don't know of.]
Re: Can you please create your ReviewBoard accounts ?
I created mine a few days ago: bschuchardt Le 6/11/2015 11:48 AM, William Markito a écrit : Folks, Can you please create your ReviewBoard ID's ? I'm already requesting for the Geode group in there, but looks like ASF INFRA couldn't find all ID's I have listed (see below) Please go ahead and sign up at https://reviews.apache.org/dashboard/ OR reply to this thread sharing your RB ID, so I can add them to the INFRA request. INFRA Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9798 agingade barry.oglesby cjgeode lises wes.williams hitesh.khamesra ukohlmeyer gregchase shankar.hundekar vivekwiz dcavender shirishd suranjan abarve nilkanth.hpatel swapnil.bawaskar hbhanawat tushark pidster rakumar swatis sonal.agarwal mvpzone sbhokare smaldini ladams lhughesgodfrey davman adongre gideonlow jacksoncvm jens.deppe nthanvi ymahajan spillai rishitesh soubhik-c kneeraj bbindra sjigyasu qihong wrmay vford13 lgallinat will.schipp ezulich vito.gav huynhja suds lshannon eshu
Re: [VOTE] Grandfathering forgotten Geode contributors
+1 *Wes Williams | Pivotal Sr. **Data Engineer* 781.606.0325 http://pivotal.io/big-data/pivotal-gemfire On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Hi! for various reasons we missed a few Pivotal folks when submitting a Geode proposal. There's nothing controversial about them -- just an honest mistake. They are all currently working on the project and contributed quite a bit in the past. In short, they have as much a claim in being a project committer as all the other folks who were on the proposal. I propose that we add them to the project as committers since they should've been on the proposal to begin with: * Chloe Jackson * Manuel David * Rajesh Kumar * Rishitesh Mishra * Shankar Hundekar * Michael Stolz * Mak Gokhale This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. Here's my +1. Thanks, Roman.
Re: [VOTE] Grandfathering forgotten Geode contributors
+1 again :) On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Hi! for various reasons we missed a few Pivotal folks when submitting a Geode proposal. There's nothing controversial about them -- just an honest mistake. They are all currently working on the project and contributed quite a bit in the past. In short, they have as much a claim in being a project committer as all the other folks who were on the proposal. I propose that we add them to the project as committers since they should've been on the proposal to begin with: * Chloe Jackson * Manuel David * Rajesh Kumar * Rishitesh Mishra * Shankar Hundekar * Michael Stolz * Mak Gokhale This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. Here's my +1. Thanks, Roman.
Re: [VOTE] Grandfathering forgotten Geode contributors
+1 -Dan On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:19 PM, John Blum jb...@pivotal.io wrote: +1 On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Wes Williams wwilli...@pivotal.io wrote: +1 *Wes Williams | Pivotal Sr. **Data Engineer* 781.606.0325 http://pivotal.io/big-data/pivotal-gemfire On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Hi! for various reasons we missed a few Pivotal folks when submitting a Geode proposal. There's nothing controversial about them -- just an honest mistake. They are all currently working on the project and contributed quite a bit in the past. In short, they have as much a claim in being a project committer as all the other folks who were on the proposal. I propose that we add them to the project as committers since they should've been on the proposal to begin with: * Chloe Jackson * Manuel David * Rajesh Kumar * Rishitesh Mishra * Shankar Hundekar * Michael Stolz * Mak Gokhale This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. Here's my +1. Thanks, Roman. -- -John 503-504-8657 john.blum10101 (skype)
[VOTE] [CANCEL] Grandfathering forgotten Geode contributors
Due to legitimate write-ins and objection over wording this VOTE is now canceled. Please cast your votes in a different thread. My apologies for not running a DISCUSS thread first. Thanks, Roman. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: Hi! for various reasons we missed a few Pivotal folks when submitting a Geode proposal. There's nothing controversial about them -- just an honest mistake. They are all currently working on the project and contributed quite a bit in the past. In short, they have as much a claim in being a project committer as all the other folks who were on the proposal. I propose that we add them to the project as committers since they should've been on the proposal to begin with: * Chloe Jackson * Manuel David * Rajesh Kumar * Rishitesh Mishra * Shankar Hundekar This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours and lazy consensus applies. Here's my +1. Thanks, Roman.
[VOTE] Grandfathering forgotten Geode contributors
Hi! for various reasons we missed a few Pivotal folks when submitting a Geode proposal. There's nothing controversial about them -- just an honest mistake. They are all currently working on the project and contributed quite a bit in the past. In short, they have as much a claim in being a project committer as all the other folks who were on the proposal. I propose that we add them to the project as committers since they should've been on the proposal to begin with: * Chloe Jackson * Manuel David * Rajesh Kumar * Rishitesh Mishra * Shankar Hundekar * Michael Stolz * Mak Gokhale This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. Here's my +1. Thanks, Roman.
Re: [VOTE] Grandfathering forgotten Geode contributors
+1 On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Rajesh Kumar rku...@pivotal.io wrote: +1 On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Suranjan Kumar suranjan.ku...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Shirish Deshmukh sdeshm...@pivotal.io wrote: +1 On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Hi! for various reasons we missed a few Pivotal folks when submitting a Geode proposal. There's nothing controversial about them -- just an honest mistake. They are all currently working on the project and contributed quite a bit in the past. In short, they have as much a claim in being a project committer as all the other folks who were on the proposal. I propose that we add them to the project as committers since they should've been on the proposal to begin with: * Chloe Jackson * Manuel David * Rajesh Kumar * Rishitesh Mishra * Shankar Hundekar * Michael Stolz * Mak Gokhale This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. Here's my +1. Thanks, Roman.
Re: [VOTE] Grandfathering forgotten Geode contributors
+1 On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Suranjan Kumar suranjan.ku...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Shirish Deshmukh sdeshm...@pivotal.io wrote: +1 On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Hi! for various reasons we missed a few Pivotal folks when submitting a Geode proposal. There's nothing controversial about them -- just an honest mistake. They are all currently working on the project and contributed quite a bit in the past. In short, they have as much a claim in being a project committer as all the other folks who were on the proposal. I propose that we add them to the project as committers since they should've been on the proposal to begin with: * Chloe Jackson * Manuel David * Rajesh Kumar * Rishitesh Mishra * Shankar Hundekar * Michael Stolz * Mak Gokhale This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. Here's my +1. Thanks, Roman.
Re: [VOTE] Grandfathering forgotten Geode contributors
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: I propose that we add them to the project as committers since they should've been on the proposal to begin with: * Chloe Jackson * Manuel David * Rajesh Kumar * Rishitesh Mishra * Shankar Hundekar * Michael Stolz * Mak Gokhale This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. +1
Re: [VOTE] Grandfathering forgotten Geode contributors
+1 On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Hi! for various reasons we missed a few Pivotal folks when submitting a Geode proposal. There's nothing controversial about them -- just an honest mistake. They are all currently working on the project and contributed quite a bit in the past. In short, they have as much a claim in being a project committer as all the other folks who were on the proposal. I propose that we add them to the project as committers since they should've been on the proposal to begin with: * Chloe Jackson * Manuel David * Rajesh Kumar * Rishitesh Mishra * Shankar Hundekar * Michael Stolz * Mak Gokhale This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. Here's my +1. Thanks, Roman.
Re: [VOTE] Grandfathering forgotten Geode contributors
+1 On Thursday, June 11, 2015, Dan Smith dsm...@pivotal.io wrote: +1 -Dan On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:19 PM, John Blum jb...@pivotal.io javascript:; wrote: +1 On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Wes Williams wwilli...@pivotal.io javascript:; wrote: +1 *Wes Williams | Pivotal Sr. **Data Engineer* 781.606.0325 http://pivotal.io/big-data/pivotal-gemfire On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org javascript:; wrote: Hi! for various reasons we missed a few Pivotal folks when submitting a Geode proposal. There's nothing controversial about them -- just an honest mistake. They are all currently working on the project and contributed quite a bit in the past. In short, they have as much a claim in being a project committer as all the other folks who were on the proposal. I propose that we add them to the project as committers since they should've been on the proposal to begin with: * Chloe Jackson * Manuel David * Rajesh Kumar * Rishitesh Mishra * Shankar Hundekar * Michael Stolz * Mak Gokhale This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. Here's my +1. Thanks, Roman. -- -John 503-504-8657 john.blum10101 (skype)
Re: [VOTE] Grandfathering forgotten Geode contributors
+1 On Jun 11, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Hi! for various reasons we missed a few Pivotal folks when submitting a Geode proposal. There's nothing controversial about them -- just an honest mistake. They are all currently working on the project and contributed quite a bit in the past. In short, they have as much a claim in being a project committer as all the other folks who were on the proposal. I propose that we add them to the project as committers since they should've been on the proposal to begin with: * Chloe Jackson * Manuel David * Rajesh Kumar * Rishitesh Mishra * Shankar Hundekar * Michael Stolz * Mak Gokhale This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. Here's my +1. Thanks, Roman.
Re: [VOTE] Grandfathering forgotten Geode contributors
+1 On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:04 AM, vivek bhaskar vbhas...@pivotal.io wrote: +1 On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Anthony Baker aba...@pivotal.io wrote: +1 On Jun 11, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Hi! for various reasons we missed a few Pivotal folks when submitting a Geode proposal. There's nothing controversial about them -- just an honest mistake. They are all currently working on the project and contributed quite a bit in the past. In short, they have as much a claim in being a project committer as all the other folks who were on the proposal. I propose that we add them to the project as committers since they should've been on the proposal to begin with: * Chloe Jackson * Manuel David * Rajesh Kumar * Rishitesh Mishra * Shankar Hundekar * Michael Stolz * Mak Gokhale This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. Here's my +1. Thanks, Roman.
Re: [VOTE] Grandfathering forgotten Geode contributors
+1 Sent from my iPhone On Jun 11, 2015, at 4:54 PM, David Yozie dyo...@pivotal.io wrote: +1 On Thursday, June 11, 2015, Dan Smith dsm...@pivotal.io wrote: +1 -Dan On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:19 PM, John Blum jb...@pivotal.io javascript:; wrote: +1 On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Wes Williams wwilli...@pivotal.io javascript:; wrote: +1 *Wes Williams | Pivotal Sr. **Data Engineer* 781.606.0325 http://pivotal.io/big-data/pivotal-gemfire On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org javascript:; wrote: Hi! for various reasons we missed a few Pivotal folks when submitting a Geode proposal. There's nothing controversial about them -- just an honest mistake. They are all currently working on the project and contributed quite a bit in the past. In short, they have as much a claim in being a project committer as all the other folks who were on the proposal. I propose that we add them to the project as committers since they should've been on the proposal to begin with: * Chloe Jackson * Manuel David * Rajesh Kumar * Rishitesh Mishra * Shankar Hundekar * Michael Stolz * Mak Gokhale This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. Here's my +1. Thanks, Roman. -- -John 503-504-8657 john.blum10101 (skype)
Re: [VOTE] Grandfathering forgotten Geode contributors
+1 On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Anthony Baker aba...@pivotal.io wrote: +1 On Jun 11, 2015, at 4:15 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Hi! for various reasons we missed a few Pivotal folks when submitting a Geode proposal. There's nothing controversial about them -- just an honest mistake. They are all currently working on the project and contributed quite a bit in the past. In short, they have as much a claim in being a project committer as all the other folks who were on the proposal. I propose that we add them to the project as committers since they should've been on the proposal to begin with: * Chloe Jackson * Manuel David * Rajesh Kumar * Rishitesh Mishra * Shankar Hundekar * Michael Stolz * Mak Gokhale This majority vote is open for at least 72 hours. Here's my +1. Thanks, Roman.
