Upcoming Genesis release

2007-07-28 Thread Jason Dillon
Just a quick note, we are gonna have to release Genesis 1.2 soonish  
to support the 2.0 build.  While its not "perfect" (or even close) it  
does work now and so I'm going to recommend we release it more or  
less asis.  I did a quick sanity check last week, and now I'm asking  
if anyone knows of any common m2 pom stuff that needs to be changed?


Is anyone using that release profile?  While its kinda what we  
eventually what, what is there now doesn't really work IIRC.  Anyone  
using it?


--jason


Re: Upcoming Genesis release

2007-07-28 Thread Kevan Miller


On Jul 28, 2007, at 8:43 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:

Just a quick note, we are gonna have to release Genesis 1.2 soonish  
to support the 2.0 build.  While its not "perfect" (or even close)  
it does work now and so I'm going to recommend we release it more  
or less asis.  I did a quick sanity check last week, and now I'm  
asking if anyone knows of any common m2 pom stuff that needs to be  
changed?


Is anyone using that release profile?  While its kinda what we  
eventually what, what is there now doesn't really work IIRC.   
Anyone using it?


Hey Jason.
Agreed that we should release. There'll always be room for  
improvement... ;-) I don't know of any pending m2 pom changes.


--kevan


Re: Upcoming Genesis release

2007-07-28 Thread Jason Dillon

On Jul 28, 2007, at 6:05 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:

On Jul 28, 2007, at 8:43 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:

Just a quick note, we are gonna have to release Genesis 1.2  
soonish to support the 2.0 build.  While its not "perfect" (or  
even close) it does work now and so I'm going to recommend we  
release it more or less asis.  I did a quick sanity check last  
week, and now I'm asking if anyone knows of any common m2 pom  
stuff that needs to be changed?


Is anyone using that release profile?  While its kinda what we  
eventually what, what is there now doesn't really work IIRC.   
Anyone using it?


Hey Jason.
Agreed that we should release. There'll always be room for  
improvement... ;-)


Yup, always is ;-)



I don't know of any pending m2 pom changes.


Aighty... well I'm gonna hope folks chime in if they are using that  
release profile, cause if not I'm gonna whack it and then spin the  
release.  Maybe monday.


--jason


Re: Upcoming Genesis release

2007-07-28 Thread Matt Hogstrom
I agree...the current profiles work.  Lots of things to do but let's  
push this one out.  Jason, are you up settin it on fire or prefer  
someone else do the honors.?


If you want I can prolly spin a release up tomorrow sometime.


On Jul 28, 2007, at 8:43 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:

Just a quick note, we are gonna have to release Genesis 1.2 soonish  
to support the 2.0 build.  While its not "perfect" (or even close)  
it does work now and so I'm going to recommend we release it more  
or less asis.  I did a quick sanity check last week, and now I'm  
asking if anyone knows of any common m2 pom stuff that needs to be  
changed?


Is anyone using that release profile?  While its kinda what we  
eventually what, what is there now doesn't really work IIRC.   
Anyone using it?


--jason





Re: Upcoming Genesis release

2007-07-28 Thread jason . dillon
I will spin it. Still wondering if anyone is using the release profile... Can't 
tell from your response. Are you using it?

--jason


-Original Message-
From: Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 21:38:16 
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Upcoming Genesis release


I agree...the current profiles work.  Lots of things to do but let's  
push this one out.  Jason, are you up settin it on fire or prefer  
someone else do the honors.?

If you want I can prolly spin a release up tomorrow sometime.


On Jul 28, 2007, at 8:43 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:

> Just a quick note, we are gonna have to release Genesis 1.2 soonish  
> to support the 2.0 build.  While its not "perfect" (or even close)  
> it does work now and so I'm going to recommend we release it more  
> or less asis.  I did a quick sanity check last week, and now I'm  
> asking if anyone knows of any common m2 pom stuff that needs to be  
> changed?
>
> Is anyone using that release profile?  While its kinda what we  
> eventually what, what is there now doesn't really work IIRC.   
> Anyone using it?
>
> --jason
>



Re: Upcoming Genesis release

2007-07-28 Thread Matt Hogstrom

The staging profile ... yes.

On Jul 28, 2007, at 9:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I will spin it. Still wondering if anyone is using the release  
profile... Can't tell from your response. Are you using it?


--jason


-Original Message-
From: Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 21:38:16
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Upcoming Genesis release


I agree...the current profiles work.  Lots of things to do but let's
push this one out.  Jason, are you up settin it on fire or prefer
someone else do the honors.?

If you want I can prolly spin a release up tomorrow sometime.


On Jul 28, 2007, at 8:43 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:


Just a quick note, we are gonna have to release Genesis 1.2 soonish
to support the 2.0 build.  While its not "perfect" (or even close)
it does work now and so I'm going to recommend we release it more
or less asis.  I did a quick sanity check last week, and now I'm
asking if anyone knows of any common m2 pom stuff that needs to be
changed?

Is anyone using that release profile?  While its kinda what we
eventually what, what is there now doesn't really work IIRC.
Anyone using it?

--jason







[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3324) Could not scan module for TLD files: illegal char (space)

2007-07-28 Thread Tim McConnell (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516198
 ] 

Tim McConnell commented on GERONIMO-3324:
-

Thanks much Jen

> Could not scan module for TLD files: illegal char (space)
> -
>
> Key: GERONIMO-3324
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3324
> Project: Geronimo
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>  Components: deployment
>Affects Versions: 2.0-M6
> Environment: Little-G on WinXP with Java 1.5.0_11
>Reporter: Jens Nicolay
>Assignee: Tim McConnell
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 2.0
>
> Attachments: WAR.war
>
>
> 16:25:24,033 ERROR [Deployer] Deployment failed due to 
> org.apache.geronimo.common.DeploymentException: Could not scan module for TLD 
> files: default/WAR/1.0/car Illegal character in path at index 16: 
> WEB-INF/lib/Easy Service.jar
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.jasper.deployment.JspModuleBuilderExtension.scanModule(JspModuleBuilderExtension.java:298)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.jasper.deployment.JspModuleBuilderExtension.getTldFiles(JspModuleBuilderExtension.java:236)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.jasper.deployment.JspModuleBuilderExtension.createJspClassFinder(JspModuleBuilderExtension.java:179)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.jasper.deployment.JspModuleBuilderExtension.addGBeans(JspModuleBuilderExtension.java:149)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.jasper.deployment.JspModuleBuilderExtension$$FastClassByCGLIB$$1f60ab3b.invoke()
>   at net.sf.cglib.reflect.FastMethod.invoke(FastMethod.java:53)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.FastMethodInvoker.invoke(FastMethodInvoker.java:38)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanOperation.invoke(GBeanOperation.java:127)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.invoke(GBeanInstance.java:828)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.RawInvoker.invoke(RawInvoker.java:57)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.RawOperationInvoker.invoke(RawOperationInvoker.java:35)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.ProxyMethodInterceptor.intercept(ProxyMethodInterceptor.java:96)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.ModuleBuilderExtension$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$cd133fa9.addGBeans()
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.jetty6.deployment.JettyModuleBuilder.addGBeans(JettyModuleBuilder.java:484)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.jetty6.deployment.JettyModuleBuilder$$FastClassByCGLIB$$1a00be84.invoke()
>   at net.sf.cglib.reflect.FastMethod.invoke(FastMethod.java:53)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.FastMethodInvoker.invoke(FastMethodInvoker.java:38)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanOperation.invoke(GBeanOperation.java:127)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.invoke(GBeanInstance.java:828)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.RawInvoker.invoke(RawInvoker.java:57)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.RawOperationInvoker.invoke(RawOperationInvoker.java:35)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.ProxyMethodInterceptor.intercept(ProxyMethodInterceptor.java:96)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.ModuleBuilder$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$57321d6a.addGBeans()
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.SwitchingModuleBuilder.addGBeans(SwitchingModuleBuilder.java:165)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.SwitchingModuleBuilder$$FastClassByCGLIB$$d0c31844.invoke()
>   at net.sf.cglib.reflect.FastMethod.invoke(FastMethod.java:53)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.FastMethodInvoker.invoke(FastMethodInvoker.java:38)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanOperation.invoke(GBeanOperation.java:127)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.invoke(GBeanInstance.java:828)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.RawInvoker.invoke(RawInvoker.java:57)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.RawOperationInvoker.invoke(RawOperationInvoker.java:35)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.ProxyMethodInterceptor.intercept(ProxyMethodInterceptor.java:96)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.ModuleBuilder$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$57321d6a.addGBeans()
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.EARConfigBuilder.buildConfiguration(EARConfigBuilder.java:616)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.j2ee.deployment.EARConfigBuilder$$FastClassByCGLIB$$38e56ec6.invoke()
>   at net.sf.cglib.reflect.FastMethod.invoke(FastMethod.java:53)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.FastMethodInvoker.invoke(FastMethodInvoker.java:38)
>   at 
> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanOperation.invoke(GBeanOperation.java:127)
>   at 
> org.apache.gero

Re: Upcoming Genesis release

2007-07-28 Thread jason . dillon
Aight I'm at a bbu at the moment. Good friends, relaxing. I will ping you on 
irc monday for reality :-)

Cheers,

--jason


-Original Message-
From: Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 22:35:33 
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Upcoming Genesis release


The staging profile ... yes.

On Jul 28, 2007, at 9:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> I will spin it. Still wondering if anyone is using the release  
> profile... Can't tell from your response. Are you using it?
>
> --jason
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 21:38:16
> To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Upcoming Genesis release
>
>
> I agree...the current profiles work.  Lots of things to do but let's
> push this one out.  Jason, are you up settin it on fire or prefer
> someone else do the honors.?
>
> If you want I can prolly spin a release up tomorrow sometime.
>
>
> On Jul 28, 2007, at 8:43 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> Just a quick note, we are gonna have to release Genesis 1.2 soonish
>> to support the 2.0 build.  While its not "perfect" (or even close)
>> it does work now and so I'm going to recommend we release it more
>> or less asis.  I did a quick sanity check last week, and now I'm
>> asking if anyone knows of any common m2 pom stuff that needs to be
>> changed?
>>
>> Is anyone using that release profile?  While its kinda what we
>> eventually what, what is there now doesn't really work IIRC.
>> Anyone using it?
>>
>> --jason
>>
>