[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (GERONIMO-3325) Geronimo does not start in Eclipse
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526041 ] sergeger edited comment on GERONIMO-3325 at 9/9/07 7:54 PM: Same issue with 2.0.1 on Solaris 10 x86 (same stack trace except '2.0-M6' replaced with '2.0.1'). On both JDK: java version "1.6.0_02" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_02-b05) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.6.0_02-b05, mixed mode, sharing) java version "1.5.0_12" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_12-b04) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_12-b04, mixed mode, sharing) FIXED: tar.gz. - seems to be have issue with unpack on Solaris zip - unpack and run fine. was (Author: sergeger): Same issue with 2.0.1 on Solaris 10 x86 (same stack trace except '2.0-M6' replaced with '2.0.1'). On both JDK: java version "1.6.0_02" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_02-b05) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.6.0_02-b05, mixed mode, sharing) java version "1.5.0_12" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_12-b04) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_12-b04, mixed mode, sharing) > Geronimo does not start in Eclipse > -- > > Key: GERONIMO-3325 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3325 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: public(Regular issues) >Affects Versions: 2.0-M6 > Environment: Geronimo 2.0M6, > g-eclipse-plugin-2.0.0-v20070703.1201-deployable.zip, WinXP, Java 1.5.0_11, > Eclipse 3.3 Europa >Reporter: Jens Nicolay >Assignee: Tim McConnell > > Simply unzipped, created runtime, and started server. > 17:34:20,509 ERROR [GBeanInstanceState] Error while starting; GBean is now in > the FAILED state: > abstractName="org.apache.geronimo.configs/j2ee-system/2.0-M6/car?configurationName=org.apache.geronimo.configs/j2ee-system/2.0-M6/car" > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.repository.MissingDependencyException: Unable to > resolve dependency org.apache.geronimo.modules/geronimo-common/2.0-M6/jar > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationResolver.resolve(ConfigurationResolver.java:114) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.Configuration.buildClassPath(Configuration.java:404) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.Configuration.createConfigurationClasssLoader(Configuration.java:321) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.Configuration.(Configuration.java:266) > at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) > at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(Unknown Source) > at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(Unknown > Source) > at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Unknown Source) > at > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.createInstance(GBeanInstance.java:944) > at > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.attemptFullStart(GBeanInstanceState.java:268) > at > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.start(GBeanInstanceState.java:102) > at > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.start(GBeanInstance.java:537) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.startGBean(BasicKernel.java:361) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationUtil.loadBootstrapConfiguration(ConfigurationUtil.java:195) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationUtil.loadBootstrapConfiguration(ConfigurationUtil.java:159) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.util.MainConfigurationBootstrapper.loadBootConfiguration(MainConfigurationBootstrapper.java:84) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.util.MainConfigurationBootstrapper.getMain(MainConfigurationBootstrapper.java:57) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.util.MainConfigurationBootstrapper.main(MainConfigurationBootstrapper.java:38) > at org.apache.geronimo.cli.AbstractCLI.executeMain(AbstractCLI.java:67) > at org.apache.geronimo.cli.daemon.DaemonCLI.main(DaemonCLI.java:30) > java.lang.IllegalStateException: GBean is not running: > org.apache.geronimo.configs/j2ee-system/2.0-M6/car?configurationName=org.apache.geronimo.configs/j2ee-system/2.0-M6/car > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.getGBean(BasicKernel.java:304) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationUtil.loadBootstrapConfiguration(ConfigurationUtil.java:197) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationUtil.loadBootstrapConfiguration(ConfigurationUtil.java:159) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.util.MainConfigurationBootstrapper.loadBootConfiguration(MainConfigurationBootstrapper.java:84) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.util.MainConfigurationBootstrapper.getMain(MainC
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3325) Geronimo does not start in Eclipse
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526041 ] Siarhei Hushchyn commented on GERONIMO-3325: Same issue with 2.0.1 on Solaris 10 x86 (same stack trace except '2.0-M6' replaced with '2.0.1'). On both JDK: java version "1.6.0_02" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_02-b05) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.6.0_02-b05, mixed mode, sharing) java version "1.5.0_12" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_12-b04) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_12-b04, mixed mode, sharing) > Geronimo does not start in Eclipse > -- > > Key: GERONIMO-3325 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3325 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: public(Regular issues) >Affects Versions: 2.0-M6 > Environment: Geronimo 2.0M6, > g-eclipse-plugin-2.0.0-v20070703.1201-deployable.zip, WinXP, Java 1.5.0_11, > Eclipse 3.3 Europa >Reporter: Jens Nicolay >Assignee: Tim McConnell > > Simply unzipped, created runtime, and started server. > 17:34:20,509 ERROR [GBeanInstanceState] Error while starting; GBean is now in > the FAILED state: > abstractName="org.apache.geronimo.configs/j2ee-system/2.0-M6/car?configurationName=org.apache.geronimo.configs/j2ee-system/2.0-M6/car" > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.repository.MissingDependencyException: Unable to > resolve dependency org.apache.geronimo.modules/geronimo-common/2.0-M6/jar > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationResolver.resolve(ConfigurationResolver.java:114) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.Configuration.buildClassPath(Configuration.java:404) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.Configuration.createConfigurationClasssLoader(Configuration.java:321) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.Configuration.(Configuration.java:266) > at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) > at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(Unknown Source) > at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(Unknown > Source) > at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Unknown Source) > at > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.createInstance(GBeanInstance.java:944) > at > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.attemptFullStart(GBeanInstanceState.java:268) > at > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.start(GBeanInstanceState.java:102) > at > org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.start(GBeanInstance.java:537) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.startGBean(BasicKernel.java:361) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationUtil.loadBootstrapConfiguration(ConfigurationUtil.java:195) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationUtil.loadBootstrapConfiguration(ConfigurationUtil.java:159) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.util.MainConfigurationBootstrapper.loadBootConfiguration(MainConfigurationBootstrapper.java:84) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.util.MainConfigurationBootstrapper.getMain(MainConfigurationBootstrapper.java:57) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.util.MainConfigurationBootstrapper.main(MainConfigurationBootstrapper.java:38) > at org.apache.geronimo.cli.AbstractCLI.executeMain(AbstractCLI.java:67) > at org.apache.geronimo.cli.daemon.DaemonCLI.main(DaemonCLI.java:30) > java.lang.IllegalStateException: GBean is not running: > org.apache.geronimo.configs/j2ee-system/2.0-M6/car?configurationName=org.apache.geronimo.configs/j2ee-system/2.0-M6/car > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.getGBean(BasicKernel.java:304) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationUtil.loadBootstrapConfiguration(ConfigurationUtil.java:197) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationUtil.loadBootstrapConfiguration(ConfigurationUtil.java:159) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.util.MainConfigurationBootstrapper.loadBootConfiguration(MainConfigurationBootstrapper.java:84) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.util.MainConfigurationBootstrapper.getMain(MainConfigurationBootstrapper.java:57) > at > org.apache.geronimo.kernel.util.MainConfigurationBootstrapper.main(MainConfigurationBootstrapper.java:38) > at org.apache.geronimo.cli.AbstractCLI.executeMain(AbstractCLI.java:67) > at org.apache.geronimo.cli.daemon.DaemonCLI.main(DaemonCLI.java:30) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: Ideas on a rc.d kind of directory
No...no reasons...move forward ;-) Jeff Jason Dillon wrote: > Hey, have you played with the rc.d bits in the > assemblies/geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-gshell enough to know if what I > whipped up will work for you? > > Any more comments or suggestions on how that stuff should work? > > I think this is done, quite powerful and flexible... though to really > know for sure we'd need to have a few plugins actually using it to > augment the Server's bootstrap configuration a? > > So... are there any reasons (significant or not) for not moving forward > with this? > > --jason > > > On Jul 16, 2007, at 6:09 AM, Jeff Genender wrote: > >> >> >> Jason Dillon wrote: >>> I still think that G could do with a tiny bootstrap JVM to handle all of >>> the required flags and properties that are needed now for the server to >>> opperate properly (and in a platform neutral manner). This could also >>> be used to spawn clones or cluster nodes. As well as handling remote >>> restarts and recovery from JVM crashes. >> >> Ok...cool...wanna help? ;-) >> >> If we can have a GShell, etc set an env property like JAVA_OPTS, please >> how an example and I am all game ;-) >> >> Jeff >> >>> >>> IMO this is critical for uber massive enterprise deployments as well as >>> smaller scale cluster management. >>> >>> I also think that GShell would be ideal for the base platform for such a >>> bootstrap JVM. >>> >>> I think it should be realativly easy to setup a POC if folks are >>> interested. >>> >>> --jason >>> >>> P.S. Typed on my iPhone. Still not quite as fast as my blackberry... >>> But I dropped in beer at the Giants/Doggers game. Ooops ;-) >>> >>> >>> On Jul 14, 2007, at 6:41 AM, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Donald Woods wrote: > Is this a scenario that would be better handled by the gshell code in > sandbox or some daemon code that also handles the multiple server > instance support? > Thought here, would be gshell could read a standard Java properties > file > for JVM args and then launch the server with them. > As long as one JVM launches, the other (ie. gshell or groovy can start another instance of a JVM) then this is doable. Otherwise, this won't work...with my Terracotta example being a reason. > In my eyes, scripts are a no-go, unless you can make them platform > neutral and not require users to install a third-party solution like > Perl (on Windows) to make it work. We already ship sh and bat code...why would this be a no-go? If this is the case, then we shouldn't be shipping startup scripts in bat and sh format. > > > -Donald > > > Jeff Genender wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As we move forward and we integrate with more and more 3rd party >> products, we will need the ability to be able to change an >> environment >> variable through a plugin, or add a commandline JAVA_OPTS, etc. >> >> Currently our startup scripts call the setjavaenv.sh to set >> environment >> properties. It would really be nice to have the ability to have a >> "scripts" directory, where all of the scripts get executed before >> Geronimo is launched. Why do we want this? >> >> As we grow in our plugins, they will need to set environment or java >> options set before running G. They may also have a need to start or >> run >> other outside processes that are not a part of G. >> >> It would be great to allow plugins to install an rc script that gets >> executed to do activities before and perhaps after G is run? >> >> I would propose we create a scripts directory under bin or under var >> that could be similar to init.d, and have it called with start/stop, >> etc. This way plugins can install specific scripts in these >> directories >> for execution. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Jeff >> >>
Re: New GShell-based Geronimo Server launcher now in server/trunk
Yeah...I need Tomcat for this plugin I am working on..thanks. Jeff Jason Dillon wrote: > Ya, should be simple enough... though I don't want to keep maintaining > these extra assemblies, I'd like to just convert all of the assemblies > to use this stuff... > > But if it helps ya out, I can make a geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-gshell... > > --jason > > > On Sep 8, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: > >> Is this working for the Tomcat assembly? If not...can it soon? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jeff >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Sep 8, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> A little bit more insight into what I'm thinking of doing... since >>> some of you can't read minds to well :-P >>> >>> I'd like to convert all of the assemblies to basically look like what >>> the assemblies/geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-gshell produces. >>> >>> And then I'd like to start converting the other cli bits to gshell >>> command impls, like: deployer, client and shutdown. >>> >>> And then (maybe around the same time or before the above), I'd like >>> to adapt the gshell of target jvm bits to load jars from the >>> repository, instead of using the lib/* bits. >>> >>> A little background for those who haven't looked at >>> assemblies/geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-gshell and what it produces from a >>> lib/* perspective. Right now I've set up the assembly to produce: >>> >>>geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-gshell-2.1-SNAPSHOT/lib >>>geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-gshell-2.1-SNAPSHOT/lib/boot >>>geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-gshell-2.1-SNAPSHOT/lib/endorsed >>>geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-gshell-2.1-SNAPSHOT/lib/gshell >>> >>> Where the bits in lib/* and lib/endorsed/* are the same as they were >>> before. The bits in lib/boot/* and lib/gshell/* are specific to >>> gshell. And normally a gshell installation would have everything I >>> put into lib/gshell/* into lib/*, but I moved them to a sub dir for >>> now... since the bin/*.jar's load jars from the ../lib/* dirs. >>> >>> The lib/boot/* stuff is the very minimal gshell bootstrap classes, >>> which setup up the other happiness... and let you do things like: >>> >>>java -jar >>> ./geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-gshell-2.1-SNAPSHOT/lib/boot/gshell-bootstrap.jar >>> >>> >>> And that will give you a nice shell... or >>> >>>java -jar >>> ./geronimo-jetty6-javaee5-gshell-2.1-SNAPSHOT/lib/boot/gshell-bootstrap.jar >>> start-server >>> >>> That will launch the G server process using all of the right >>> -Djava.ext.dirs and whatever properties that we currently have hacked >>> into platform scripts. >>> >>> Anyways, so the idea is to move all of the bits which are current in >>> the lib/* into the repository, and then configure the gshell command >>> impl to load put the correct dependency artifacts onto the classpath >>> of the target jvm that is booted up. This will augment the existing >>> kernel bootstrap from repo stuff, putting evertying except what is >>> needed from gshell into the repository... >>> >>> And really, what I'd like to eventually get to is having the >>> bootstrap from the repository... so that everything except for what >>> is now it lib/boot/* and lib/endorsed/* can live in the repository >>> like happy little communistic jars should be :-P >>> >>> * * * >>> >>> And then there are longer term things for GShell... >>> >>> Remote administration (via, telnet, ssh, or custom ssl protocol... >>> last is most likely to actually happen soonish) >>> >>> Process management, which is great for clusters, or staging -> >>> production management. A full suite of command-line tools which can >>> manage the configuration of a server... easily. So, for example, >>> lets say you've got a configuration that is working really well for >>> you... but you want to play with something new... >>> >>> So you might: >>> >>>./bin/gsh backup-configuration before-mucking >>>./bin/gsh start-server >>> >>> And then go and change a whole bunch of stuff... and it doesn't >>> work... yikes... so rollback... >>> >>>./bin/gsh backup-configuration hosed-server >>>./bin/gsh restore-configuration before-mucking >>>./bin/gsh start-server >>> >>> And then maybe you want to play with the "hosed-server" configuration >>> again... >>> >>>./bin/gsh start-server --configuration hosed-server >>> >>> Of course, all of these could have been run from a single ./bin/gsh, >>> but just for clarity, you can run them one off too. >>> >>> Maybe list or mange the configurations >>> >>>./bin/gsh list-configurations >>>./bin/gsh remove-configuration some-unwanted-config >>>./bin/gsh copy-configuration default some-new-config >>> >>> The sky is the limit really... for what kind of management we can do... >>> >>> Lets say you wanted to do the above on a remote node? >>> >>>./bin/gsh remote-shell someserver:9443 >>>Connecting to someserver:9447... >>>Connected >>> >>>username: system >>>password: (remember this is all jline, so we can mask >>> passwords l
Logging out from a web app when using BASIC authentication
Is it not possible to logout from a web application while using BASIC authentication? I see that logout works as expected when I use FORM authentication and I am able to login as a different user without closing the browser. When BASIC authentication is configured, I have to close the browser window to be able login as a different user :( Vamsi
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-197) Mechanism required to LICENSE/NOTICE files management
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacek Laskowski updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-197: - Summary: Mechanism required to LICENSE/NOTICE files management (was: Mechanism required to ) > Mechanism required to LICENSE/NOTICE files management > - > > Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-197 > URL: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-197 > Project: Geronimo-Devtools > Issue Type: Bug > Components: eclipse-plugin >Affects Versions: 2.0 >Reporter: Tim McConnell >Assignee: Tim McConnell > Fix For: 2.0 > > > Per suggestions from David Jencks there seems to be a couple alternatives to > consider (maven-rat-plugin or the maven-remote-resources-plugin) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (GSHELL-5) MOTD-like support
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-5?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Dillon closed GSHELL-5. - Resolution: Fixed Use shared profile script to implement this as desired > MOTD-like support > - > > Key: GSHELL-5 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-5 > Project: GShell > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Components: Core >Affects Versions: 0.0.1 >Reporter: Jason Dillon >Assignee: Jason Dillon > Fix For: 1.0-alpha-1 > > > Execute a "welcome.gsh" or something? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (GSHELL-26) Add custom security manager to disable dangerous things like System.exit()
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-26?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Dillon closed GSHELL-26. -- Resolution: Fixed > Add custom security manager to disable dangerous things like System.exit() > -- > > Key: GSHELL-26 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GSHELL-26 > Project: GShell > Issue Type: New Feature > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Components: Core >Affects Versions: 0.0.1 >Reporter: Jason Dillon >Assignee: Jason Dillon > Fix For: 1.0-alpha-1 > > > Take a peek at org.apache.tools.ant.util.optional.NoExitSecurityManager for > an example. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
