Re: XBean release
Yep, a full profile tck run is preferable when we finalize the xbean new release. I could help trigger a tck execution when the change into 3.0-beta branch. On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to see a full run of geronimo tck result before the release. On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote: On Apr 5, 2012, at 6:53 PM, David Blevins wrote: Hoping to get time to do an xbean release today or tomorrow. Let me know if there's any reason to wait. Sounds good to me. I recall Jarek had some Jira's / commits (e.g. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-204), but the Jira isn't closed. If that work is in a good state, I'd say a release is in order... --kevan -- Shawn -- Thanks! Regards, Forrest
Re: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Apr 2012
I've updated https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/apache-geronimo-board-report-2012-04-april.html --kevan On Apr 1, 2012, at 9:36 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: FYI Begin forwarded message: From: ASF Board bo...@apache.org Subject: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for Apr 2012 Date: April 1, 2012 8:24:21 PM EDT To: Kevan Miller ke...@apache.org This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the ASF Board. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare the report. The meeting is scheduled for Wed, 18 April 2012, 10:00:00 PST and the deadline for submitting your report is 1 full week prior to that (Wed, Apr 11th)! According to board records, you are listed as the chair of at least one committee that is due to submit a report this month. [1] [2] Details on which project reports are due and how to submit a report are enclosed below. Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you should submit your report is 1 full week (7days) prior to the board meeting (Wed, Apr 11th). If you feel that an error has been made, please consult [1] and if there is still an issue then contact the board directly. As always, PMC chairs are welcome to attend the board meeting. Thanks, The ASF Board [1] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/committee-info.txt [2] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/calendar.txt [3] - https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/templates Submitting your Report -- Full details about the process and schedule are in [1]. The report should be committed to the meeting agenda in the board directory in the foundation repository, trying to keep a similar format to the others. This can be found at: https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/foundation/board Your report should also be sent in plain-text format to bo...@apache.org with a Subject line that follows the below format: Subject: [REPORT] Project Name Cutting and pasting directly from a Wiki is not acceptable due to formatting issues. Line lengths should be limited to 77 characters. Resolutions --- There are several templates for use for various Board resolutions. They can be found in [3] and you are encouraged to use them. It is strongly recommended that if you have a resolution before the board, you are encouraged to attend that board meeting. ASF Board Reports - Reports are due from you for the following committees: - Geronimo
[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-5778) Exclude jars from annotation scanning and/or bundle classpath
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan updated GERONIMO-5778: --- Fix Version/s: 3.0-beta-2 Exclude jars from annotation scanning and/or bundle classpath - Key: GERONIMO-5778 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5778 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Improvement Security Level: public(Regular issues) Components: deployment Affects Versions: 3.0 Reporter: Jarek Gawor Assignee: Ivan Fix For: 3.0-beta-2 In most cases large web applications with a number of embedded dependencies contain jars that do not need to be scanned for annotations and/or included on bundle class path. So it would be nice to have a way to specify in a deployment descriptor 1) a list of jars that shouldn't be scanned for annotations, and 2) a list of jars that do not need to be included in the bundle class path. #2 is probably a bit less useful as the web application archive can always be recreated but #1 might be very useful. It would help to speed up the (re)deployment process. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: XBean release
It sounds like there's willingness, but I'm not sure who is doing what and when. If I put the vote up tonight, would the standard 72 hour vote period be enough for you or Shawn to get the TCK run complete? If not that's totally fine and we'll probably just use a patched version of xbean-finder instead as we're trying to get an OpenEJB/TomEE final release out this week. -David On Apr 10, 2012, at 1:53 AM, Forrest Xia wrote: Yep, a full profile tck run is preferable when we finalize the xbean new release. I could help trigger a tck execution when the change into 3.0-beta branch. On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to see a full run of geronimo tck result before the release. On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: On Apr 5, 2012, at 6:53 PM, David Blevins wrote: Hoping to get time to do an xbean release today or tomorrow. Let me know if there's any reason to wait. Sounds good to me. I recall Jarek had some Jira's / commits (e.g. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-204), but the Jira isn't closed. If that work is in a good state, I'd say a release is in order... --kevan -- Shawn -- Thanks! Regards, Forrest
Re: XBean release
Alright, might be easier to just put the release up for vote and give people the time to do what they need. Rolling -David On Apr 10, 2012, at 9:45 PM, David Blevins wrote: It sounds like there's willingness, but I'm not sure who is doing what and when. If I put the vote up tonight, would the standard 72 hour vote period be enough for you or Shawn to get the TCK run complete? If not that's totally fine and we'll probably just use a patched version of xbean-finder instead as we're trying to get an OpenEJB/TomEE final release out this week. -David On Apr 10, 2012, at 1:53 AM, Forrest Xia wrote: Yep, a full profile tck run is preferable when we finalize the xbean new release. I could help trigger a tck execution when the change into 3.0-beta branch. On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to see a full run of geronimo tck result before the release. On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote: On Apr 5, 2012, at 6:53 PM, David Blevins wrote: Hoping to get time to do an xbean release today or tomorrow. Let me know if there's any reason to wait. Sounds good to me. I recall Jarek had some Jira's / commits (e.g. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-204), but the Jira isn't closed. If that work is in a good state, I'd say a release is in order... --kevan -- Shawn -- Thanks! Regards, Forrest
