Re: [VOTE] Release bval-jsr303 bundle 0.4_1

2012-05-15 Thread Forrest Xia
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:

> checksum/signature, build, rat, source, license/notice -- all look fine.
>
> Here's my +1, but I have a few comments/questions.
>
> 1. velocity.log need not be in svn. best that we remove…
>
velocity.log is not in the svn, and I noticed it's in the source zip only,
and think it might be auto-introduced during release process with maven
release plugin.

> 2. why does geronimo need a bundle release of bval? any reason why our
> requirements have not/cannot be pushed into BVAL?
>
Geronimo needs some integration code in ValidationParser.java. And the 0.4
release of bval itself is not a bundle either.

> 3. why is there a CDDL license and note in the NOTICE file?
>
I have no idea why there is a CDDL license resource there, anyone else know
the history?

>
> --kevan
>
> On May 14, 2012, at 12:06 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
> > This is a version upgrade release, from 0.3_incubating to 0.4, for bval
> bundled in Geronimo, raised via GERONIMO-6345, it's to fix the tck failures
> when upgrading BV TCK to 1.0.6.GA level.
> >
> > The artifacts up for vote are:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-086/org/apache/geronimo/bundles/bval-jsr303/0.4_1/bval-jsr303-0.4_1-source-release.tar.gz
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-086/org/apache/geronimo/bundles/bval-jsr303/0.4_1/bval-jsr303-0.4_1-source-release.zip
> >
> >
> > The tag is:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/bundles/tags/bval-jsr303-0.4_1/
> >
> >  Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> >  [ ] +1  approve
> >  [ ] +0  no opinion
> >  [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > --
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Regards, Forrest
> >
>
>


-- 
Thanks!

Regards, Forrest


Re: [VOTE] Release bval-jsr303 bundle 0.4_1

2012-05-15 Thread Kevan Miller

On May 15, 2012, at 9:11 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:

> 
> 
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Kevan Miller  wrote:
> checksum/signature, build, rat, source, license/notice -- all look fine.
> 
> Here's my +1, but I have a few comments/questions.
> 
> 1. velocity.log need not be in svn. best that we remove…
> velocity.log is not in the svn, and I noticed it's in the source zip only, 
> and think it might be auto-introduced during release process with maven 
> release plugin.
> 2. why does geronimo need a bundle release of bval? any reason why our 
> requirements have not/cannot be pushed into BVAL?
> Geronimo needs some integration code in ValidationParser.java. And the 0.4 
> release of bval itself is not a bundle either.

Have we asked the bval community to add the integration code? 

Could have fooled me… 
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/bval/org.apache.bval.bundle/0.4/

> 3. why is there a CDDL license and note in the NOTICE file?
> I have no idea why there is a CDDL license resource there, anyone else know 
> the history? 

'svn log' or 'svn blame' (or 'svn praise' depending on what kind of mood you're 
in) are usually a good first step.

svn log 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/bundles/tags/bval-jsr303-0.3_1-incubating/src/main/appended-resources/META-INF/NOTICE.vm

So, following commit seems to be the culprit 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-scm/201108.mbox/%3c20110825040758.424f82388...@eris.apache.org%3E

I assume the basic framework was copied from the jstl bundle. The NOTICE is 
wrong. More importantly, it does not include the BVAL NOTICE. So, we are not 
complying with the AL. This changes things and needs to be fixed, IMO.

Here's my -1.

--kevan

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6349) Follow Axis2 version convention in Geronimo Axis2 bundle

2012-05-15 Thread Ivan (JIRA)
Ivan created GERONIMO-6349:
--

 Summary: Follow Axis2 version convention in Geronimo Axis2 bundle
 Key: GERONIMO-6349
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6349
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: public (Regular issues)
  Components: webservices
Affects Versions: 3.0-beta-1
Reporter: Ivan
Priority: Minor


2012-05-14 21:17:24,651 ERROR [ModuleDeployer] The axis2-1.6.1_1.jar module, 
which is not valid, caused For input string: "1_1"
org.apache.axis2.deployment.DeploymentException: For input string: "1_1"
at 
org.apache.axis2.deployment.repository.util.ArchiveReader.readModuleArchive(ArchiveReader.java:527)
at 
org.apache.axis2.deployment.ModuleDeployer.deploy(ModuleDeployer.java:77)
at 
org.apache.axis2.deployment.repository.util.DeploymentFileData.deploy(DeploymentFileData.java:136)
at 
org.apache.axis2.deployment.DeploymentEngine.doDeploy(DeploymentEngine.java:813)
at 
org.apache.axis2.deployment.RepositoryListener.loadClassPathModules(RepositoryListener.java:222)
at 
org.apache.axis2.deployment.RepositoryListener.init2(RepositoryListener.java:71)
at 
org.apache.axis2.deployment.RepositoryListener.(RepositoryListener.java:64)
at 
org.apache.axis2.deployment.DeploymentEngine.loadFromClassPath(DeploymentEngine.java:175)
at 
org.apache.geronimo.axis2.GeronimoConfigurator.getAxisConfiguration(GeronimoConfigurator.java:47)
at 
org.apache.axis2.context.ConfigurationContextFactory.createConfigurationContext(ConfigurationContextFactory.java:64)
at 
org.apache.geronimo.axis2.client.Axis2ClientConfigurationFactory.createConfigurationContext(Axis2ClientConfigurationFactory.java:104)
at 
org.apache.geronimo.axis2.client.Axis2ClientConfigurationFactory.getConfigurationContext(Axis2ClientConfigurationFactory.java:64)
at 
org.apache.geronimo.axis2.client.Axis2ClientConfigurationFactory.getClientConfigurationContext(Axis2ClientConfigurationFactory.java:57)
at 
org.apache.axis2.jaxws.description.impl.DescriptionFactoryImpl.createServiceDescription(DescriptionFactoryImpl.java:92)
at 
org.apache.axis2.jaxws.description.impl.DescriptionFactoryImpl.createServiceDescription(DescriptionFactoryImpl.java:79)
at 
org.apache.axis2.jaxws.description.DescriptionFactory.createServiceDescription(DescriptionFactory.java:78)
at org.apache.axis2.jaxws.spi.ServiceDelegate.(ServiceDelegate.java:218)
at 
org.apache.axis2.jaxws.spi.Provider.createServiceDelegate(Provider.java:83)
at 
org.apache.axis2.jaxws.spi.Provider.createServiceDelegate(Provider.java:79)
at javax.xml.ws.Service.(Service.java:35)
at 
***
at 
net.sf.cglib.reflect.FastConstructor.newInstance(FastConstructor.java:40)
at 
org.apache.geronimo.jaxws.client.JAXWSServiceReference.createServiceProxy(JAXWSServiceReference.java:218)
at 
org.apache.geronimo.jaxws.client.JAXWSServiceReference.getContent(JAXWSServiceReference.java:153)
at 
org.apache.geronimo.axis2.client.Axis2ServiceReference.getContent(Axis2ServiceReference.java:74)
at 
org.apache.xbean.naming.context.ContextUtil.resolve(ContextUtil.java:61)
at 
org.apache.xbean.naming.context.AbstractContext.lookup(AbstractContext.java:116)
at 
org.apache.xbean.naming.context.AbstractContext.lookup(AbstractContext.java:605)
at 
org.apache.geronimo.client.AppClientContainer.main(AppClientContainer.java:158)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at 
org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.ReflectionMethodInvoker.invoke(ReflectionMethodInvoker.java:34)
at 
org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanOperation.invoke(GBeanOperation.java:131)
at 
org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.invoke(GBeanInstance.java:883)
at 
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.invoke(BasicKernel.java:245)
at 
org.apache.geronimo.system.main.CommandLine.doInvokeMainGBean(CommandLine.java:112)
at 
org.apache.geronimo.system.main.CommandLine.invokeMainGBean(CommandLine.java:92)
at 
org.apache.geronimo.system.main.ClientCommandLine.startClient(ClientCommandLine.java:84)
at 
org.apache.geronimo.system.main.ClientCommandLine.execute(ClientCommandLine.java:66)
at 
org.apache.geronimo.system.main.EmbeddedClientCommandLine.execute(EmbeddedClientCommandLine.java:46)
at 
org.apache.geronimo.system.osgi.BootActivator$1.execute(BootActivator.jav

[jira] [Closed] (GERONIMO-6196) There is no "Generate CSR, Import CA reply ,Change key password" options in Keystore private key page

2012-05-15 Thread viola.lu (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

viola.lu closed GERONIMO-6196.
--

Resolution: Invalid

> There is no "Generate CSR, Import CA reply,Change key password" options 
> in Keystore private key page
> -
>
> Key: GERONIMO-6196
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6196
> Project: Geronimo
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>  Components: console
>Affects Versions: 2.2.1, 3.0
>Reporter: viola.lu
>Priority: Minor
>
> CA-keystore and geronimo-default keystore both have "generate CSR, Import CA 
> reply, and chang key password" options, but newly created one in keysotre 
> portlet doesn't have these options. Have to switch between console and 
> keytool. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira