Re: [VOTE] Geronimo Validation 2.0 (spec) v1.0

[David Blevins]

+1

Thank you for doing this, Romain!


-- 
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com

> On Sep 30, 2018, at 8:38 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau  wrote:
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> To enable BVal and TomEE releases, I'd like to release our validation spec 
> bundle.
> 
> Here is the staging repo: 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1071 
> 
> The dist (dev) area is: 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/specs/validation/ 
>  (rev 
> 29801)
> The tag is: 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-validation_2.0_spec-1.0/
>  
> 
>  (rev 1842396)
> My key is the same as usual.
> 
> Vote will be open for 3 days or until we cancel it or we get 3 +1 binding 
> votes.
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog 
>  | Old Blog 
>  | Github  
> | LinkedIn  | Book 
> 

asm7 preparation

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Hi guys,

Asm 7 beta was released yesterday, I'd like to try to release it ASAP.
I see 1 main point to discuss before releasing: do we keep the version in
the package and module name? For now it is required cause we cant guarantee
anything about asm compatibility.

Options I see are:
1. drop asm and use bcel (which is asf)
2. drop asm and reimplement bytecode parsing for our need (but will create
issue in most of our stack for proxy creation IMHO)
3. keep it like that
4. use an "asm.*" package crossing fingers

I'd love 4 but I fear it can create issue quickly when I see what java is
becoming so, personally, i think 3 is safe but since we are at "that"
moment I'd like to get your feedback.

Side note: if I get no other vote than 3 before tuesday, i'll try to launch
the release on tuesday with asm7 module and package to let us get it out.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Book

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo Validation 2.0 (spec) v1.0

[Raymond Auge]

+1

- Ray

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018, 11:38 Romain Manni-Bucau, 
wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> To enable BVal and TomEE releases, I'd like to release our validation spec
> bundle.
>
> Here is the staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1071
> The dist (dev) area is:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/specs/validation/ (rev
> 29801)
> The tag is:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-validation_2.0_spec-1.0/
> (rev 1842396)
> My key is the same as usual.
>
> Vote will be open for 3 days or until we cancel it or we get 3 +1 binding
> votes.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github
>  | LinkedIn
>  | Book
> 
>

[VOTE] Geronimo Validation 2.0 (spec) v1.0

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Hi guys,

To enable BVal and TomEE releases, I'd like to release our validation spec
bundle.

Here is the staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1071
The dist (dev) area is:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/specs/validation/ (rev
29801)
The tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-validation_2.0_spec-1.0/
(rev 1842396)
My key is the same as usual.

Vote will be open for 3 days or until we cancel it or we get 3 +1 binding
votes.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Book

Re: coming g-validation release?

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

starting it

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Book



Le dim. 30 sept. 2018 à 00:03, Mark Struberg  a écrit :

> please go for it!
>
> I've validated the signature and it's fine.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 29.09.2018 um 17:44 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau  >:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > bval needs a release of our spec jar (v2), anyone able to work on the
> javadoc soon or should i launch the release in the coming day(s)?
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book
>
>

[RESULT][VOTE] Release XBean 4.10

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Which makes 4 +1 (3 bindings) and no other votes so this release passes.
I'll continue with the release steps ASAP.

Thanks guys.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Book



Le dim. 30 sept. 2018 à 00:02, Mark Struberg  a écrit :

> +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 26.09.2018 um 10:11 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau  >:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > XBean got asm upgraded to 6.2.1 which contains some java 11 fixes (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-311). Here is the vote to
> promote it.
> >
> > The dist (dev) area is available at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/ (rev 29700)
> > The staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1070
> > Tag is http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-4.10/
> (rev 1842004)
> > My keys is the same as last time (available in
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS)
> >
> > This vote is open for 3 days as usual or untll it gets its 3 binding +1s.
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book
>
>