Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.11 release

[David Blevins]

+1


-- 
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com

> On Oct 3, 2018, at 12:11 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau  wrote:
> 
> Hello everyone,
> Here is the vote to let us get asm7 shade and a fix in the multiversion jar 
> scanning.
> 
> The dist (dev) area is available at 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/ 
>  (rev 29854)
> The staging repo is: 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1072 
> 
> Tag is http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-4.11/ 
>  (rev 
> 1842681)
> My keys is still available in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS 
> 
> 
> This vote is open for 3 days as usual or untll it gets its 3 binding +1s.
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog 
>  | Old Blog 
>  | Github  
> | LinkedIn  | Book 
> 

Directorio Empresarial Mexicano 2018

[BSM]

Title: google



NUEVO DIRECTORIO EMPRESARIAL MEXICANO 2018
   

! SE INCLUYEN INCLUYE 2 DIRECTORIOS !


  B) Directorio Empresarial de mas de 2 millones de empresas a nivel nacional en formato Excel con DATOS COMPLETOS.
 
  (Nombre Empresa, Contacto, E-mail, Telefono, Direccion, Puesto, Giro, Pagina Web, Tamaño de Empresa, ETC.)

 

B)  Directorio Empresarial de 18 millones de mails empresariales divididos por ESTADO.


900,000 empresas del D.F. y Edo. de Mexico 

6,000 Tequileras a Nivel nacional

300,000 empresas en Guadalajara

500,000 empresas a nivel nacional (grande, mediana y pequeña) 

140,000 empresas en Monterrey

130,000 Pymes a nivel nacional

40,000 empresas de la industria turistica a nivel nacional 

57,000 empresas de la industria manufacturera a nivel nacional

36,000 empresas con organigrama a nivel nacional

60,000 empresas del sector de la construccion a nivel nacional 

3,000 empresas en sistemas

2,000 Datos de universidades a nivel nacional

15,000 empresas medianas con numero de empleados 

11,000 empresas importantes en Mexico (gobierno, instituciones bancarias, etc.)

20,000 areas salud a nivel nacional 

10,000 empresas del sector de agricultura en Mexico

45,000 empresas medianas en el Edo. De Mexico

8,000 franquicias en Mexico

1.5 Millones de ejecutivos divididos en 3 sectores empresariales (UNICAMENTE CORREOS)

2 millones de mails de diferentes expos en Mexico (UNICAMENTE CORREOS) 

3.5 millones de mails varias industrias en todo Mexico (UNICAMENTE CORREOS) 

50,000 Industria Farmaceutica (UNICAMENTE CORREOS) 

175,000 Monterrey (UNICAMENTE CORREOS)

35,000 Queretaro (UNICAMENTE CORREOS) 

55,000 Guadalajara  (UNICAMENTE CORREOS)

15,000 Area Bancaria (UNICAMENTE CORREOS) 

130,000 mails empresariales divididos por estado (UNICAMENTE CORREOS)

12,000 mails Camaras de Comercio (UNICAMENTE CORREOS) 

30,000 mails divididos por rubros (UNICAMENTE CORREOS)

45,000 mails Industria Constructora (UNICAMENTE CORREOS)

23,000 mails Industria Tecnologica (UNICAMENTE CORREOS) 

90,000 pymes D.F. y Edo. Mexico (UNICAMENTE CORREOS) 

25,000 Visitantes a Expos en Franquicias (UNICAMENTE CORREOS)

Y MUCHAS BASES MAS…

Solo Valido HASTA el Viernes 5 de Octubre 2018 

Precio por promocion: $ 6,900.00 + IVA 
Precio normal: $ 19,500.00  + IVA

100% Directorios Empresariales. Contamos con referencias comerciales.  


No lo piense mas, solo por unos dias mas podra adquirir la base mas completa en Mexico a un precio bastante bajo que no se volvera a repetir.
 


Para adquirirla

Favor de responder al correo: bases.segmentadas.mex...@gmail.com

NOTA IMPORTANTE: Solo se respetara el precio a las personas que envien sus datos y realicen el deposito 
maximo el Viernes 5 de Octubre del 2018. 



PREGUNTAS FRECUENTES:

En que formato viene la base? 
R= Excel y Txt

Hasta que fecha estan actualizadas las bases? 
R= A Septiembre 2018

Envian bases muestra para su evaluacion? 
R= Si, solo es necesario nos indique a que cuenta de correo se lo hacemos llegar. 

Cuentan con referencias comerciales? 
R= Si, entre nuestros clientes se encuentran EMPRESAS IMPORTANTES en Mexico. 

Cuentan con alguna garantia? 
R= Si, enviamos GARANTIA DE ENVIO Y EFECTIVIDAD DEL DIRECTORIO. 

Donde obtuvieron los datos? 
R= Somos una empresa que tambien imparte cursos y seminarios de cierre de ventas y servicio al cliente, continuamente estamos presentes en eventos empresariales en donde ADQUIRIMOS NUEVAS BASES, asi como tambien intercambiamos bases con otras empresas.
 

En que tiempo me llega el Directorio una vez pagado? 
R= Inmediatamente mediante un link de descarga para su PC. 
  
  
FAVOR DE INDICAR EN ASUNTO SI DESEA SER REMOVIDO.
 

Oferta valida para dev@geronimo.apache.org.

Re: Managed connection pool on Safegard

[Bruno Baptista]

Thanks John and Romain,

Will work on the new FailsafeExecutionManagerProvider.

Cheers

Bruno Baptista
http://twitter.com/brunobat_


On 03/10/2018 18:21, John D. Ament wrote:

Hi Bruno

Thanks for the PR!

I think my intention for what's provided in Safeguard is that we have 
an overideable per container integration that allows you to look up 
the executor.  So rather than having boolean logic, you use a new 
implementation of FailsafeExecutionManagerProvider (perhaps as an 
alternative). This way the lookup can be done based on how your 
platform is developed.


Thanks,

John

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 5:53 AM Romain Manni-Bucau 
mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>> wrote:


yes, this is why I mentionned to make the pool configurable to
make it work in both environment and in multiple apps with
different pool.

Out of my head I thought about making it injectable instead of
trying all possible strategies/relying on a system properties but
I just realized that we already support SE and EE with managed
pool, just make a @Specializes of FailsafeExecutionManagerProvider
producer.

It sounds to me more flexible and easier to understand.

wdyt?


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  | Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github
 | LinkedIn
 | Book




Le mer. 3 oct. 2018 à 11:39, Bruno Baptista mailto:bruno...@gmail.com>> a écrit :

Hi Romain,

I've updated the PR to get the resource location from a property.
In relation to the try/catch... I'm assuming that the library
is supposed to work with both SE and EE environments, if we
don't catch the exception this will never work on SE. In any
case, if an error exists, it will be printed and can be found.

Cheers

Bruno Baptista
http://twitter.com/brunobat_


On 03/10/2018 10:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:

Hi Bruno,

Technically this pool does not "have to be" managed ;).

That said this is a good feature. Can you make the pool
configurable instead of hardcoding the default pool which is
never used except in tests? Will also avoid to catch and
silently ignore the error (can be an issue in servers).

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  | Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github
 | LinkedIn
 | Book




Le mer. 3 oct. 2018 à 10:58, Bruno Baptista
mailto:bruno...@gmail.com>> a écrit :

Hi folks,

Safegard creates a java se connection pool to handle the
bulckhead and
async operations. When deployed in a container, that pool
has to be
managed.

I created a PR that allows to retrieve that managed pool,
if available:

https://github.com/apache/geronimo-safeguard/pull/2

Can someone please take a look at it?

Regards

-- 
Bruno Baptista

http://twitter.com/brunobat_

Re: Managed connection pool on Safegard

[John D. Ament]

Hi Bruno

Thanks for the PR!

I think my intention for what's provided in Safeguard is that we have an
overideable per container integration that allows you to look up the
executor.  So rather than having boolean logic, you use a new
implementation of FailsafeExecutionManagerProvider (perhaps as an
alternative).  This way the lookup can be done based on how your platform
is developed.

Thanks,

John

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 5:53 AM Romain Manni-Bucau 
wrote:

> yes, this is why I mentionned to make the pool configurable to make it
> work in both environment and in multiple apps with different pool.
>
> Out of my head I thought about making it injectable instead of trying all
> possible strategies/relying on a system properties but I just realized that
> we already support SE and EE with managed pool, just make a @Specializes of 
> FailsafeExecutionManagerProvider
> producer.
>
> It sounds to me more flexible and easier to understand.
>
> wdyt?
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github
>  | LinkedIn
>  | Book
> 
>
>
> Le mer. 3 oct. 2018 à 11:39, Bruno Baptista  a écrit :
>
>> Hi Romain,
>>
>> I've updated the PR to get the resource location from a property.
>> In relation to the try/catch... I'm assuming that the library is supposed
>> to work with both SE and EE environments, if we don't catch the exception
>> this will never work on SE. In any case, if an error exists, it will be
>> printed and can be found.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Bruno Baptista
>> http://twitter.com/brunobat_
>>
>>
>> On 03/10/2018 10:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>> Hi Bruno,
>>
>> Technically this pool does not "have to be" managed ;).
>>
>> That said this is a good feature. Can you make the pool configurable
>> instead of hardcoding the default pool which is never used except in tests?
>> Will also avoid to catch and silently ignore the error (can be an issue in
>> servers).
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>>  | Old Blog
>>  | Github
>>  | LinkedIn
>>  | Book
>> 
>>
>>
>> Le mer. 3 oct. 2018 à 10:58, Bruno Baptista  a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> Safegard creates a java se connection pool to handle the bulckhead and
>>> async operations. When deployed in a container, that pool has to be
>>> managed.
>>>
>>> I created a PR that allows to retrieve that managed pool, if available:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/geronimo-safeguard/pull/2
>>>
>>> Can someone please take a look at it?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bruno Baptista
>>> http://twitter.com/brunobat_
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.11 release

[Raymond Auge]

+1

- Ray

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 8:07 AM Łukasz Dywicki  wrote:

> Although not binding, here is +1 from me too :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Lukasz
>
> On 10/3/18 12:22 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >> Am 03.10.2018 um 10:57 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
> >>
> >> +1 (non binding)
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >> On 03/10/2018 09:11, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> >>> Hello everyone,
> >>>
> >>> Here is the vote to let us get asm7 shade and a fix in the multiversion
> >>> jar scanning.
> >>>
> >>> The dist (dev) area is available
> >>> at _https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/
> >>> _ (rev 29854)
> >>> The staging repo
> >>> is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1072
> >>> Tag
> >>> is http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-4.11/
> (rev
> >>> 1842681)
> >>> My keys is still available
> >>> in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>> This vote is open for 3 days as usual or untll it gets its 3 binding
> +1s.
> >>>
> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >>>  | Old Blog
> >>>  | Github
> >>>  | LinkedIn
> >>>  | Book
> >>> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >> jbono...@apache.org
> >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >
>


-- 
*Raymond Augé* 
 (@rotty3000)
Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* 
 (@Liferay)
Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance  (@OSGiAlliance)

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.11 release

[Łukasz Dywicki]

Although not binding, here is +1 from me too :-)

Cheers,
Lukasz

On 10/3/18 12:22 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> +1
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
>> Am 03.10.2018 um 10:57 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
>>
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 03/10/2018 09:11, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> Here is the vote to let us get asm7 shade and a fix in the multiversion
>>> jar scanning.
>>>
>>> The dist (dev) area is available
>>> at _https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/
>>> _ (rev 29854)
>>> The staging repo
>>> is: 
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1072
>>> Tag
>>> is http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-4.11/ (rev
>>> 1842681)
>>> My keys is still available
>>> in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
>>> 
>>>
>>> This vote is open for 3 days as usual or untll it gets its 3 binding +1s.
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>>>  | Old Blog
>>>  | Github
>>>  | LinkedIn
>>>  | Book
>>> 
>>
>> -- 
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbono...@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.11 release

[Mark Struberg]

+1

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 03.10.2018 um 10:57 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
> 
> +1 (non binding)
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
> On 03/10/2018 09:11, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>> 
>> Here is the vote to let us get asm7 shade and a fix in the multiversion
>> jar scanning.
>> 
>> The dist (dev) area is available
>> at _https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/
>> _ (rev 29854)
>> The staging repo
>> is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1072
>> Tag
>> is http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-4.11/ (rev
>> 1842681)
>> My keys is still available
>> in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
>> 
>> 
>> This vote is open for 3 days as usual or untll it gets its 3 binding +1s.
>> 
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>>  | Old Blog
>>  | Github
>>  | LinkedIn
>>  | Book
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: Managed connection pool on Safegard

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

yes, this is why I mentionned to make the pool configurable to make it work
in both environment and in multiple apps with different pool.

Out of my head I thought about making it injectable instead of trying all
possible strategies/relying on a system properties but I just realized that
we already support SE and EE with managed pool, just make a
@Specializes of FailsafeExecutionManagerProvider
producer.

It sounds to me more flexible and easier to understand.

wdyt?

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Book



Le mer. 3 oct. 2018 à 11:39, Bruno Baptista  a écrit :

> Hi Romain,
>
> I've updated the PR to get the resource location from a property.
> In relation to the try/catch... I'm assuming that the library is supposed
> to work with both SE and EE environments, if we don't catch the exception
> this will never work on SE. In any case, if an error exists, it will be
> printed and can be found.
>
> Cheers
> Bruno Baptista
> http://twitter.com/brunobat_
>
>
> On 03/10/2018 10:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> Technically this pool does not "have to be" managed ;).
>
> That said this is a good feature. Can you make the pool configurable
> instead of hardcoding the default pool which is never used except in tests?
> Will also avoid to catch and silently ignore the error (can be an issue in
> servers).
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github
>  | LinkedIn
>  | Book
> 
>
>
> Le mer. 3 oct. 2018 à 10:58, Bruno Baptista  a écrit :
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Safegard creates a java se connection pool to handle the bulckhead and
>> async operations. When deployed in a container, that pool has to be
>> managed.
>>
>> I created a PR that allows to retrieve that managed pool, if available:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/geronimo-safeguard/pull/2
>>
>> Can someone please take a look at it?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> --
>> Bruno Baptista
>> http://twitter.com/brunobat_
>>
>>
>>
>

Re: Managed connection pool on Safegard

[Bruno Baptista]

Hi Romain,

I've updated the PR to get the resource location from a property.
In relation to the try/catch... I'm assuming that the library is 
supposed to work with both SE and EE environments, if we don't catch the 
exception this will never work on SE. In any case, if an error exists, 
it will be printed and can be found.


Cheers

Bruno Baptista
http://twitter.com/brunobat_


On 03/10/2018 10:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:

Hi Bruno,

Technically this pool does not "have to be" managed ;).

That said this is a good feature. Can you make the pool configurable 
instead of hardcoding the default pool which is never used except in 
tests? Will also avoid to catch and silently ignore the error (can be 
an issue in servers).


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  | Blog 
 | Old Blog 
 | Github 
 | LinkedIn 
 | Book 




Le mer. 3 oct. 2018 à 10:58, Bruno Baptista > a écrit :


Hi folks,

Safegard creates a java se connection pool to handle the bulckhead
and
async operations. When deployed in a container, that pool has to be
managed.

I created a PR that allows to retrieve that managed pool, if
available:

https://github.com/apache/geronimo-safeguard/pull/2

Can someone please take a look at it?

Regards

-- 
Bruno Baptista

http://twitter.com/brunobat_

Re: Managed connection pool on Safegard

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Hi Bruno,

Technically this pool does not "have to be" managed ;).

That said this is a good feature. Can you make the pool configurable
instead of hardcoding the default pool which is never used except in tests?
Will also avoid to catch and silently ignore the error (can be an issue in
servers).

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Book



Le mer. 3 oct. 2018 à 10:58, Bruno Baptista  a écrit :

> Hi folks,
>
> Safegard creates a java se connection pool to handle the bulckhead and
> async operations. When deployed in a container, that pool has to be
> managed.
>
> I created a PR that allows to retrieve that managed pool, if available:
>
> https://github.com/apache/geronimo-safeguard/pull/2
>
> Can someone please take a look at it?
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Bruno Baptista
> http://twitter.com/brunobat_
>
>
>

Managed connection pool on Safegard

[Bruno Baptista]

Hi folks,

Safegard creates a java se connection pool to handle the bulckhead and 
async operations. When deployed in a container, that pool has to be 
managed.


I created a PR that allows to retrieve that managed pool, if available:

https://github.com/apache/geronimo-safeguard/pull/2

Can someone please take a look at it?

Regards

--
Bruno Baptista
http://twitter.com/brunobat_

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.11 release

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

+1 (non binding)

Regards
JB

On 03/10/2018 09:11, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> Here is the vote to let us get asm7 shade and a fix in the multiversion
> jar scanning.
> 
> The dist (dev) area is available
> at _https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/
> _ (rev 29854)
> The staging repo
> is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1072
> Tag
> is http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-4.11/ (rev
> 1842681)
> My keys is still available
> in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
> 
> 
> This vote is open for 3 days as usual or untll it gets its 3 binding +1s.
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github
>  | LinkedIn
>  | Book
> 

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

[VOTE] Apache XBean 4.11 release

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Hello everyone,
Here is the vote to let us get asm7 shade and a fix in the multiversion jar
scanning.

The dist (dev) area is available at
*https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/
* (rev 29854)
The staging repo is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1072
Tag is http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-4.11/ (rev
1842681)
My keys is still available in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS

This vote is open for 3 days as usual or untll it gets its 3 binding +1s.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Book