Re: TomEE 8 / Jakarta EE 8 / JavaMail 1.5

[Mark Struberg]

thanks JL!

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 01.08.2019 um 14:42 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro :
> 
> Hey TomEE and Geronimo folks,
> 
> I built and deployed 1.5 SNAPSHOT of JavaMail API and provider.
> I also did the integration in TomEE with the snapshots.
> 
> I am currently running Jakarta EE TCK to see where we are at.
> I'll be pushing setup changes shortly.
> 
> This is related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2606
> 
> If that looks quite well, I will do a release of both this week if possible
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com

TomEE 8 / Jakarta EE 8 / JavaMail 1.5

[Jean-Louis Monteiro]

Hey TomEE and Geronimo folks,

I built and deployed 1.5 SNAPSHOT of JavaMail API and provider.
I also did the integration in TomEE with the snapshots.

I am currently running Jakarta EE TCK to see where we are at.
I'll be pushing setup changes shortly.

This is related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2606

If that looks quite well, I will do a release of both this week if possible
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: Status of geronimo-javamail_1.5_spec

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

didn't do big tests but looks good to me

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Book



Le jeu. 1 août 2019 à 09:41, Romain Manni-Bucau  a
écrit :

> /me having a look now
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github
>  | LinkedIn
>  | Book
> 
>
>
> Le mer. 31 juil. 2019 à 23:25, Romain Manni-Bucau 
> a écrit :
>
>> If we checked we didnt put throw new UnsupportedOperationException
>> everywhere +1, otherwise we should probably ensure it brings enough to
>> users or catch up
>>
>> Le mer. 31 juil. 2019 à 23:14, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
>> a écrit :
>>
>>> +1, so are we ok for me to run a release on what we have?
>>>
>>> Le mar. 30 juil. 2019 à 14:18, Mark Struberg  a
>>> écrit :
>>>
 +1

 LieGrue,
 strub

 > Am 30.07.2019 um 13:14 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
 rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
 >
 > Hi JL
 >
 > Was thinking the same,some api used by new libs like greenmail
 utilities are missing in our last bundle so we should definitively catch 
 up.
 >
 > +1 to skip beta/milestone stage, always had been considered as
 snapshot so does not help the project much and most of the implis actually
 clearly not in beta ;).
 >
 > Le mar. 30 juil. 2019 à 12:09, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
 jeano...@gmail.com> a écrit :
 > Hey guys,
 >
 > I don't see any release for geronimo-javamail_1.5_spec
 > What's the current status?
 > Can we release it if it's at least in a beta state?
 >
 > --
 > Jean-Louis


>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Louis
>>>
>>

Re: Status of geronimo-javamail_1.5_spec

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

/me having a look now

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Book



Le mer. 31 juil. 2019 à 23:25, Romain Manni-Bucau  a
écrit :

> If we checked we didnt put throw new UnsupportedOperationException
> everywhere +1, otherwise we should probably ensure it brings enough to
> users or catch up
>
> Le mer. 31 juil. 2019 à 23:14, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO  a
> écrit :
>
>> +1, so are we ok for me to run a release on what we have?
>>
>> Le mar. 30 juil. 2019 à 14:18, Mark Struberg  a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>> > Am 30.07.2019 um 13:14 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>>> >
>>> > Hi JL
>>> >
>>> > Was thinking the same,some api used by new libs like greenmail
>>> utilities are missing in our last bundle so we should definitively catch up.
>>> >
>>> > +1 to skip beta/milestone stage, always had been considered as
>>> snapshot so does not help the project much and most of the implis actually
>>> clearly not in beta ;).
>>> >
>>> > Le mar. 30 juil. 2019 à 12:09, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
>>> a écrit :
>>> > Hey guys,
>>> >
>>> > I don't see any release for geronimo-javamail_1.5_spec
>>> > What's the current status?
>>> > Can we release it if it's at least in a beta state?
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Jean-Louis
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Louis
>>
>