Re: Batchee coming release 1.0.1

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1

Regards
JB

> Le 26 oct. 2021 à 10:07, Romain Manni-Bucau  a écrit :
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I pushed a few changes on BatchEE, highlights are:
> 
> 1. drop of cxf 2 client support (think it is way overdue)
> 2. adding basic spring-boot batchee UI integration
> 
> I'd like to release it, any objection?
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec 1.0.1

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Good point, I think the release should be reset.

Regards
JB

> Le 11 oct. 2021 à 17:28, Francois Papon  a 
> écrit :
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm not sure to understand, we moved the source repository from svn to gitbox 
> for javamail so for me it's a -1.
> 
> Can you do the release from gitbox?
> 
> regards,
> 
> François
> 
> fpa...@apache.org
> francois.pa...@openobject.fr
> Le 07/10/2021 à 21:30, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit :
>> Hi!
>> 
>> I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec 1.0.1 
>> 
>> Here is the staging repo
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1141
>> 
>> And the source jar which is voted on
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1141/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec/1.0.1/geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec-1.0.1-source-release.zip
>> 
>> SVN tag
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec-1.0.1/
>> 
>> My key can be found at
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
>> 
>> please VOTE
>> [+1] all fine, ship it
>> [+0] don't care
>> [-1] stop, because ${reason}
>> 
>> The VOTE is open for 72h.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jean-Louis

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Hi Mark,

I guess you mean for the release ? 

If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a single repo (it’s what 
I’m doing at ServiceMix).

But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo per spec (less 
convenient anyway).

Regards
JB

> Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg  a écrit :
> 
> specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec as own git repo, 
> isn't?
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
>> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our project
>> repositories from svn to gitbox.
>> 
>> 
>> I think we can start with this projects:
>> 
>> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/
>> 
>> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/
>> 
>> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/
>> 
>> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
>> 
>> 
>> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
>> 
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo
>> 
>> 
>> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to move.
>> 
>> regards,
>> 
>> -- 
>> François
>> fpa...@apache.org
>> 
> 

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Hi,

No objection from my side.

Regards
JB

> Le 11 mai 2021 à 05:39, fpa...@apache.org a écrit :
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our project
> repositories from svn to gitbox.
> 
> 
> I think we can start with this projects:
> 
> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/
> 
> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/
> 
> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/
> 
> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
> 
> 
> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
> 
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo
> 
> 
> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to move.
> 
> regards,
> 
> -- 
> François
> fpa...@apache.org
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache BatchEE 1.0.0

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 (binding)

Regards
JB

> Le 8 mai 2021 à 09:51, Mark Struberg  a écrit :
> 
> hi lords and ladies!
> 
> I want to call a VOTE on releasing Apache BatchEE 1.0.0
> This is mainly an update to JavaEE8 and a few bug fixes.
> 
> We fixed the following tickets.
> 
> Bug
> 
> [BATCHEE-126 ] - upgrade 
> to tomee-8.0.6
> [BATCHEE-149 ] - 
> BatchCDIInjectionExtension should only use CDI.current() if container is 
> really started
> [BATCHEE-150 ] - 
> JDBCDictionary deleteStepExecution did contain invalid SQL
> [BATCHEE-151 ] - starting 
> batchee-cli in parallel might cause race conditions when unpacking WARs
> New Feature
> 
> [BATCHEE-148 ] - Upgrade 
> BatchEE-1.0.0 to EE8
> Task
> 
> [BATCHEE-147 ] - upgrade 
> to latest apache parent
> 
> 
> The staging repository is hosted here: 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebatchee-1007/ 
> 
> 
> The source zip can be found here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebatchee-1007/org/apache/batchee/batchee/1.0.0/
>  
> 
> sha1 is da2990a42caaa639a50df03de3eaec4f6548a8bc
> 
> Please VOTE
> 
> [+1] ship it!
> [+0] don't care
> [-1] stop, there's a ${showstopper}
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache xBean-4.20

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 (binding)

Thanks Mark !

Regards
JB

> Le 7 mai 2021 à 10:22, Mark Struberg  a écrit :
> 
> hiho!
> 
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing xbean-4.20.
> 
> The only change is to switch back to a dependency-reduced pom.
> 4.18 und 4.19 did leak the shaded ASM dependencies down to consumers. This 
> defeats the shading.
> Downstream projects can of course use exclude lists, but since the artifactId 
> changes rather quickly it would be great to not leak those artifacts.
> 
> 
> The staging repository is here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1139 
> 
> 
> The source zip can be found here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1139/org/apache/xbean/xbean/4.20/
>  
> 
> sha1 is 9813469618230d15bf17763ca7f989e414608a0f
> 
> Please VOTE
> 
> [+1] let's ship it!
> [+0] don't care
> [-1] stop there is a ${showstopper}
> 
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h.
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 

Re: BATCHEE release?

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

No problem for me.

Regards
JB

> Le 28 avr. 2021 à 08:54, Mark Struberg  a écrit :
> 
> while coming along, I'd also update BATCHEE to fit EE8 and update to 
> 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
> Any objections?
> 
> LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 
> On Wednesday, 28 April 2021, 08:44:08 CEST, Francois Papon 
>  wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> Sounds good to me :)
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> regards,
> 
> François
> fpa...@apache.org 
> 
> Le 28/04/2021 à 07:13, Mark Struberg a écrit :
> > hi folks!
> >
> > I'd like to do a BATCHEE release soon. 
> > Anything you want to work on then ping me.
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >

Re: BATCHEE release?

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 for the release. No objection.

Regards
JB

> Le 28 avr. 2021 à 07:13, Mark Struberg  a écrit :
> 
> hi folks!
> 
> I'd like to do a BATCHEE release soon. 
> Anything you want to work on then ping me.
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
> 

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Bean 4.19 release

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Hi everyone,

This vote passed with the following result:

+1 (binding): Jean-Lous Monteiro, Romain Manni-Bucau, Ray Augé, JB Onofré, 
François Papon

I’m promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist, and update Jira.

Thanks all for your vote.

Regards
JB

> Le 13 avr. 2021 à 07:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a écrit :
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I submit XBean 4.19 to your vote.
> 
> This release especially includes:
> - Upgrade to ASM 9.1
> - Fix a NPE when the superclass is not set in the bundle finder
> - Fix OSGi headers in asm9 shaded artifact
> 
> Release Notes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310312&version=12348824
>  
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310312&version=12348824>
> 
> Maven Staging Repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1138/ 
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1138/>
> 
> Dist Staging Repository:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/4.19/ 
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/4.19/>
> 
> Please vote to approve this release:
> 
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB

Re: [VOTE] Apache Bean 4.19 release

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Casting my own +1 (binding) ;)

Regards
JB

> Le 13 avr. 2021 à 07:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a écrit :
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I submit XBean 4.19 to your vote.
> 
> This release especially includes:
> - Upgrade to ASM 9.1
> - Fix a NPE when the superclass is not set in the bundle finder
> - Fix OSGi headers in asm9 shaded artifact
> 
> Release Notes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310312&version=12348824
>  
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310312&version=12348824>
> 
> Maven Staging Repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1138/ 
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1138/>
> 
> Dist Staging Repository:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/4.19/ 
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/4.19/>
> 
> Please vote to approve this release:
> 
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB

[VOTE] Apache Bean 4.19 release

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Hi everyone,

I submit XBean 4.19 to your vote.

This release especially includes:
- Upgrade to ASM 9.1
- Fix a NPE when the superclass is not set in the bundle finder
- Fix OSGi headers in asm9 shaded artifact

Release Notes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310312&version=12348824
 


Maven Staging Repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1138/ 


Dist Staging Repository:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/4.19/ 


Please vote to approve this release:

[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)

This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

Thanks !
Regards
JB

Release XBean 4.19

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Hi guys,

As XBEAN-326 is impacting several projects (Pax Web, Karaf, ActiveMQ, …), 
especially when using Jackson 2.12.x, I would like to release xbean 4.19.
I have some minor dependency updates but it’s ready: I tested 4.19-SNAPSHOT and 
it fixes the NPE issue.

No objection ?

Thanks,
Regards
JB

Re: XBean github mirror open issue for sync update

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

It’s what I thought. Thanks, I will push directly ;)

Regards
JB

> Le 9 mars 2021 à 14:58, Romain Manni-Bucau  a écrit :
> 
> Hi JB,
> 
> You can create a PR but I fear it will never reach asf repo so just push 
> directly.
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog 
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog 
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> 
> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book 
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
> 
> Le mar. 9 mars 2021 à 14:56, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Just a quick question: I would like to fix the OSGi headers. Should I create 
> a PR or just push directly ?
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
>> Le 9 mars 2021 à 14:54, Romain Manni-Bucau > <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Just to let you know, I opened an issue to ensure our github mirror is 
>> synchronized for XBean: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21544 
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21544>
>> 
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog 
>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog 
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github 
>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn 
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book 
>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>

Re: XBean github mirror open issue for sync update

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Hi,

Thanks.

Just a quick question: I would like to fix the OSGi headers. Should I create a 
PR or just push directly ?

Regards
JB

> Le 9 mars 2021 à 14:54, Romain Manni-Bucau  a écrit :
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Just to let you know, I opened an issue to ensure our github mirror is 
> synchronized for XBean: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21544 
> 
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog 
>  | Old Blog 
>  | Github  
> | LinkedIn  | Book 
> 

Re: MP Config implementation and interpolations

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Agree for "clean interpolation" and add a flag to be spec compliant.

Regards
JB

> Le 13 févr. 2021 à 10:07, Romain Manni-Bucau  a écrit :
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Seems our list injection supports interpolation of values whereas plain value 
> (String, primitives, ...) don't until you use a converter.
> I suspect it is not intended because both should support or not injection for 
> consistency.
> I'm tempted to make interpolation supported properly and have a global flag 
> to disable it to make it spec compliant if needed - it never makes sense to 
> not support it in real apps to be honest, in particular in k8s world which is 
> what targets MP, no? ;)
> 
> Wdyt?
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog 
>  | Old Blog 
>  | Github  
> | LinkedIn  | Book 
> 

Re: Modernizing geronimo-transaction

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Hi Florent,

Maybe we can start with a set of Jira or discussion on the mailing list.

I think it makes sense to move forward on geronimo-transaction and prepare a 
new release.

Thanks !
Regards
JB

> Le 11 févr. 2021 à 22:50, Florent Guillaume  a écrit :
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Is there any interest in modernizing geronimo-transaction a bit? Is there any 
> chance of then doing a release in the not too distant future if some patches 
> get accepted (i.e., is geronimo-transaction completely dead or not)?
> 
> FYI my first changes would probably be to allow usage of a java.time.Clock 
> for time measurement and timeout management, in order to allow better (and 
> faster) unit testing.
> 
> Thanks,
> Florent
> 
> -- 
>   
> Florent Guillaume  Head of R&D     
>   
> Nuxeo Content Services Platform. Stay ahead.
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Arthur 1.0.2

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 (binding)

Regards
JB

> Le 11 févr. 2021 à 12:16, Romain Manni-Bucau  a écrit :
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I'd like to release Arthur 1.0.2 as mentionned on the list.
> It is only about ensuring our maven plugin resolves knights properly:
> 
> GERONIMO-6803    Knight 
> not properly downloaded by maven plugin 
> 
> 
> Staging repo: 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1137/ 
> 
> Sources: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/arthur/ 
> 
> Tag: 
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geronimo-arthur.git;a=commit;h=8c1622696e62d99d95e8942f8f2f1d85ab05d34f
>  
> 
> My key is the same than for last releases.
> 
> Please vote:
> 
> [ ] +1 release it
> [ ] -1 don't release it cause ${blocker}
> 
> Vote will be opened as usual for 3 days or as needed.
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog 
>  | Old Blog 
>  | Github  
> | LinkedIn  | Book 
> 

Re: Release arthur 1.0.2 soon?

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Thanks, I will take a look !

Regards
JB

> Le 8 févr. 2021 à 17:12, Romain Manni-Bucau  a écrit :
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Anyone able to test GERONIMO-6803 before we release arthur 1.0.2?
> I'd love to release it with this fix but a second pair of eyes would be 
> welcomed.
> To test you need to use a knight or any resolvable dependency (g:a:v  syntax) 
> in graalExtensions of native-image mojo config and ensure it is *downloaded* 
> and not resolved locally (which is the bug).
> 
> If not blocker at the end of the week I think I will try to launch a release 
> of it.
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog 
>  | Old Blog 
>  | Github  
> | LinkedIn  | Book 
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Arthur 1.0.1

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 (binding)

Regards
JB

> Le 8 janv. 2021 à 12:40, Romain Manni-Bucau  a écrit :
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I'd like to release Arthur 1.0.1.
> 
> Here is the changelog:
> 
> T Patch Info  Key Summary AssigneeReporterP   
> Status  Resolution  Created Updated Due Development 
>   
>   GERONIMO-6799 
>  
> Enable to use ldd to detect libs to package in docker images 
> Romain Manni-Bucau 
> 
>  Romain Manni-Bucau 
> 
>  RESOLVEDFixed   05/Jan/21   05/Jan/21   
> Actions 
> 
>   
>   GERONIMO-6798 
>  
> Enable to use a custom annotation marker instead of @RegisterClass 
>   Romain Manni-Bucau 
> 
>  Romain Manni-Bucau 
> 
>  RESOLVEDFixed   30/Dec/20   30/Dec/20   
> Actions 
> 
>   
>   GERONIMO-6797 
>  
> Enable winegrower knight/extension 
>   Romain Manni-Bucau 
> 
>  Romain Manni-Bucau 
> 
>  RESOLVEDFixed   30/Dec/20   30/Dec/20   
> Actions 
> 
>   
>   GERONIMO-6796 
>  
> Provide an OpenWebBeans integration 
>  Romain Manni-Bucau 
> 
>  Romain Manni-Bucau 
> 
>  RESOLVEDFixed   30/Dec/20   30/Dec/20   
> Actions 
> 
>   
>   GERONIMO-6795 
>  
> Upgrade to graalvm 20.3.0 
>    Romain 
> Manni-Bucau 
> 
>  Romain Manni-Bucau 
> 
>  RESOLVEDFixed   30/Dec/20   30/Dec/20   
> Actions 
> 
>   
>   GERONIMO-6778 
>  
> Enable to download graal on github 
>   Romain Manni-Bucau 
> 
>  Romain Manni-Bucau 
> 
>  RESOLVEDFixed   17/Jul/20   17/Jul/20   
> Actions 
> 
>   
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-openapi-1.0.14

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 (binding)

Regards
JB

> Le 30 nov. 2020 à 11:53, Romain Manni-Bucau  a écrit :
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Here is the vote for Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.14.
> Here is the changelog:
> 
> 1–4 of 4View in Issue Navigator 
> 
> P T   Key Summary AssigneeStatus
>   GERONIMO-6786 
>  Support @BeanParam 
> Romain 
> Manni-Bucau 
> 
>  RESOLVED
>   GERONIMO-6787 
>  openapi.json should 
> land in META-INF/resources by default not META-INF/classes 
> Romain Manni-Bucau 
> 
>  RESOLVED
>   GERONIMO-6788 
>  Make JAXRS optional 
> for schema processor + support BigDecimal/BigInteger and Object 
>    Romain 
> Manni-Bucau 
> 
>  RESOLVED
>   GERONIMO-6790 
>  Enable to use 
> SchemaProcessor without jaxrs 
>    Romain 
> Manni-Bucau 
> 
>  RESOLVED
> 1–4 of 4
> 
> Here is the staging repo: 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1135/ 
> 
> Here is the dist area: 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/openapi/ 
> 
> Here is the tag: 
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geronimo-openapi.git;a=commit;h=ed7112a2fea3c38b1bbe80d7ff534a0af49fa619
>  
> 
> My key is the same than last times.
> 
> Please vote:
> 
> [ ] +1 release it
> [ ] -1 ${cause}
> 
> Vote will be opened for 3 days or until we get 3 +1 bindings.
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog 
>  | Old Blog 
>  | Github  
> | LinkedIn  | Book 
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo BatchEE 0.6

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 (binding)

Regards
JB

> Le 12 nov. 2020 à 12:39, Romain Manni-Bucau  a écrit :
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Here is the vote for batchee 0.6.
> Here is the changelog: 
> 
> 1–14 of 14View in Issue Navigator 
> 
> P T   Key Summary AssigneeStatus
>   BATCHEE-135  
> Command "Names" not working 
>  Reinhard Sandtner 
>    
> RESOLVED
>   BATCHEE-108  
> Job entities don't support optimistic locking 
>    Unassigned  OPEN
>   BATCHEE-126  
> upgrade to tomee-7.0.4 
>   Mark Struberg 
> OPEN
>   BATCHEE-131  
> JBatchController Service does not stop JBatch on shutdown 
>    Mark Struberg 
> OPEN
>   BATCHEE-132  
> Ensure ServicesManager has a lifecycle (= adds close()) 
>  Romain Manni-Bucau 
> 
>  RESOLVED
>   BATCHEE-133  
> remote stop dosen't work with BatchEE-CLI 
>    Mark Struberg 
> 
> RESOLVED
>   BATCHEE-134  
> EJB Timer not working in CLI Runner 
>  Unassigned  RESOLVED
>   BATCHEE-136  
> Errors thrown in JobListeners aren't printed at all 
>  Romain Manni-Bucau 
> 
>  RESOLVED
>   BATCHEE-141  
> Upgrade TomEE    
> Romain Manni-Bucau 
> 
>  RESOLVED
>   BATCHEE-142  
> Add CDI SE lifecycle (cli) 
>   Romain Manni-Bucau 
> 
>  RESOLVED
>   BATCHEE-143  
> Add jakarta module for jbatch impl 
>   Romain Manni-Bucau 
> 
>  RESOLVED
>   BATCHEE-138  
> Failure in Read-Process-Write Loop: Somehow one of the metrics was zero 
>  Romain Manni-Bucau 
> 
>  RESOLVED
>   BATCHEE-139  
> JPAPersistenceManagerService throws a Nullpointer in case an invalid 
> execution id is passed to getJobExecution 
>   Unassigned  
> RESOLVED
>   BATCHEE-140  
> Propagate JobOperatorImpl instance to SimpleJobExecutionCallbackService 
> properly Unassigned
>   RESOLVED
> 1–14 of 14
> 
> Tag: 
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geronimo-batchee.git;a=tag;h=b8f6a9427014a2c512de84c0cf074e143ddf82e8
>  
> 
> Dist: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/batchee/ 
> 
> Staging: 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebatchee-1006/ 
> 
> My key is still the same.
> 
> Please vote:
> 
> [ ] +1 release
> [ ] -1 dont ${cause}
> 
> vote will be open for 3 days or until we get enough bindings.
> 
> Romain Manni-

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo JWT Auth 1.0.4

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 (binding)

Regards
JB

> Le 11 nov. 2020 à 21:53, Romain Manni-Bucau  a écrit :
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Here is the vote for our JWT Auth implementation v 1.0.4.
> 
> The issues are:
> 
> GERONIMO-6757 Changes to 
> make geronimo-jwt-auth work with Aries CDI 
> UnassignedOPENGERONIMO-6765
>  Add basic OSGi support 
> to germino-jwt-auth 
> Raymond Augé 
> OPEN
> 
> Tag: 
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geronimo-jwt-auth.git;a=tag;h=6e10f2d71f9786e77b46466e99cbe3f7db18e12d
>  
> 
> Dist area: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/jwt-auth/ 
> 
> Staging: 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1134/ 
> 
> My key is the same than for last votes.
> 
> Please vote:
> 
> [ ] +1 release
> [ ] -1 don't release ${cause}
> 
> Vote will be open as usual for 3 full days or until we get enough binding 
> votes.
> 
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog 
>  | Old Blog 
>  | Github  
> | LinkedIn  | Book 
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Simple JCache 1.0.5

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 (binding)

Thanks
Regards
JB

> Le 10 nov. 2020 à 18:10, Francois Papon  a 
> écrit :
> 
> +1 (non-binding)
> 
> thanks!
> 
> regards,
> 
> François
> fpa...@apache.org 
> Le 10/11/2020 à 15:36, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
>> Hi everyone,
>> 
>> Here is the vote for our JCache implementation.
>> The only issue it fixes is:
>> 
>>  GERONIMO-6789 
>>  Simple JCache 
>> extension does not work well with cdi (cdi helper not found) 
>> Romain 
>> Manni-Bucau 
>> 
>>  RESOLVED
>> 
>> Tag: 
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geronimo-jcache-simple.git;a=commit;h=0f80de0706534d19d9bca0f4aa22b6b330996971
>>  
>> 
>> Dist area: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/simple-jcache/ 
>> 
>> Staging: 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1133/ 
>> 
>> My key is the same than for last votes.
>> 
>> Please vote:
>> 
>> [ ] +1 release
>> [ ] -1 don't release ${cause}
>> 
>> Vote will be open as usual for 3 full days or until we get enough binding 
>> votes.
>> 
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau  |  Blog 
>>  | Old Blog 
>>  | Github 
>>  | LinkedIn 
>>  | Book 
>> 

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-openapi-1.0.13

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 (binding)

Regards
JB

> Le 16 oct. 2020 à 15:20, Mark Struberg  a écrit :
> 
> 
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Here is the staging repo
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1132/ 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> source jars can be found at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1132/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo-openapi/1.0.13/
>  
> 
> sha1 074ecb59b23e5a8550126e360dc244c75bd5dc6d
> 
> Please VOTE
> 
> [+1] go ship it
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] stop, there is a ${showstopper}
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h
> 
> Here is my own one for the start.
> +1
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub

Re: jira ticket mess

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Hi,

What about generalizing use of fix version containing the "target" project (and 
we do for openapi or metrics) ?

I think both component + fix version would be enough to clearly identify 
release content/release notes.

Regards
JB


> Le 16 oct. 2020 à 13:34, Mark Struberg  a écrit :
> 
> hi folks!
> 
> Geronimo is an umbrella project. We have tons of tickets, but we actually 
> cannot make much sense of it tracking wise as the versions in JIRA is per 
> project and not per module.
> 
> That means if we do a release, we do not really have a clean track about what 
> actually got fixed, right?
> 
> Otoh if we would do a distinct JIRA project per actual release artifact, then 
> we would have 100++ different jira projecs? Just think about all the many 
> dozen geronimo-spec jars.
> 
> How do we want to cope with this in the future? Does anyone have an idea how 
> this can be improved?
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
> 

Re: [VOTE] geronimo jsonp, jsonb, security, validation releases

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 (binding)

Regards
JB

> Le 15 oct. 2020 à 22:38, Mark Struberg  a écrit :
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I want to call a VOTE on releasing 
> 
> 
> geronimo-json_1.1_spec-1.5
> geronimo-jsonb_1.0_spec-1.4
> geronimo-security_1.0_spec-1.1
> geronimo-validation_2.0_spec-1.1
> 
> The only difference to the previous releases is the addition of jpms module 
> names via manifest by updating to genesis-flava8-2.4.
> I did run the release with Java8. Have fun!
> 
> 
> The staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1131/ 
> 
> 
> 
> Please VOTE
> 
> [+1] go ship it
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] stop, there is a ${showstopper}
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h
> 
> Here is my own one for the start.
> +1
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec api version 1.3

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 (binding)

Regards
JB

> Le 15 oct. 2020 à 19:40, Mark Struberg  a écrit :
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I want to call a VOTE on releasing 
> geronimo-jcdi_2.0 1.3
> 
> The staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1130/ 
> 
> 
> source jars can be found
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1130/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec/1.3/
>  
> 
> sha1 3b12c73bef67722578fa68874074879fd0473748
> 
> 
> Please VOTE
> 
> [+1] go ship it
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] stop, there is a ${showstopper}
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h
> 
> Here is my own one for the start.
> +1
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
> 

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-jcdi_1.0 and 1.1 spec jars

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 (binding)

Regards
JB

> Le 15 oct. 2020 à 19:37, Mark Struberg  a écrit :
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I want to call a VOTE on releasing 
> geronimo-jcdi_1.0-1.1 and
> geronimo-jcdi_1.1-1.1
> 
> The staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1129/ 
> 
> 
> source jars can be found
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1129/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec/1.1/
>  
> 
> sha1 54f20c989d20cb56363c88b9884376821b6b0a4e
> 
> and 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1129/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jcdi_1.1_spec/1.1/
>  
> 
> sha1 8ef821f792a6d1286edf719774e8ea32ded145b6
> 
> Please VOTE
> 
> [+1] go ship it
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] stop, there is a ${showstopper}
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h
> 
> Here is my own one for the start.
> +1
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
> 
> 

Re: [DISCUSS] release a few specs

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1

Regards
JB

> Le 15 oct. 2020 à 12:37, Mark Struberg  a écrit :
> 
> hi!
> 
> I'd love to release a few specs today. They do not have any API changes but 
> are important nonetheless:
> 
> The following 3 specs did get an important fix against a ClassCastException
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6784 
> 
> 
> Txs to Arne Limburg for this fix!
> 
> This affects 3 spec artifacts:
> *   geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec
> *   geronimo-jcdi_1.1_spec
> *   geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec
> 
> 
> The other category of specs I'd love to release fall into the Java9 Module 
> updates I prepared with genesis java8-flava:
> *   geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec
> *   geronimo-json_1.1_spec
> *   geronimo-jsonb_1.0_spec
> *   geronimo-security_1.0_spec
> *   geronimo-validation_2.0_spec
> 
> Gonna start rolling those releases soon.
> So cry up now ;)
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec 1.0.0

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 (binding)

Regards
JB

> Le 13 oct. 2020 à 16:59, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO  a écrit :
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec 1.0.0 
> 
> Here is the staging repo
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1127 
> 
> 
> And the source jar which is voted on
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1127/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec/1.0.0/geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec-1.0.0-source-release.zip
>  
> 
> 
> SVN tag
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec-1.0.0/
>  
> 
> 
> My key can be found at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS 
> 
> 
> please VOTE
> [+1] all fine, ship it
> [+0] don't care
> [-1] stop, because ${reason}
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h.
> 
> -- 
> Jean-Louis

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo JavaMail Impl and Provider 1.0.0 for javamail spec 1.6

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 (binding)

Regards
JB

> Le 13 oct. 2020 à 17:07, Raymond Auge  a écrit :
> 
> +1
> 
> - Ray
> 
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 11:04 AM Jean-Louis MONTEIRO  > wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I’d like to call a VOTE on the Geronimo JavaMail Impl and Provider for 
> javamail spec 1.6
> 
> Here is the staging repo
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1128 
> 
> 
> And the source jar which is voted on
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1128/org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.6/1.0.0/geronimo-javamail_1.6-1.0.0-source-release.zip
>  
> 
> 
> SVN tag
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.6-1.0.0/
>  
> 
> 
> My key can be found at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS 
> 
> 
> please VOTE
> [+1] all fine, ship it
> [+0] don't care
> [-1] stop, because ${reason}
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h.
> 
> -- 
> Jean-Louis
> 
> 
> -- 
> Raymond Augé  (@rotty3000)
> Senior Software Architect Liferay, Inc.  (@Liferay)

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo XBean 4.18

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

Just note: Karaf test is confirmed but I did a mistake about winegrower. Doing 
a new run.

Regards
JB

> Le 21 sept. 2020 à 08:36, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a écrit :
> 
> By the way, tested without problem in Winegrower and Karaf.
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
>> Le 21 sept. 2020 à 08:34, Jean-Baptiste Onofre > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> a écrit :
>> 
>> +1 (non binding)
>> 
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
>>> Le 21 sept. 2020 à 08:21, Romain Manni-Bucau >> <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>>> 
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> 
>>> Here is the vote for xbean 4.18 which provides asm9 shade.
>>> 
>>> Here is the tag: 
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-4.18/ 
>>> <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-4.18/> (rev 
>>> 1881880)
>>> Here is the staging repo: 
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1126/ 
>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1126/>
>>> Here is the dist area:  
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/ 
>>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/>
>>> My Key is the same as last time.
>>> 
>>> Please vote:
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1 release it
>>> [ ] -1 cause ${reason}
>>> 
>>> Vote will be open for 3 days or until we get enough bindings as usual.
>>> 
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog 
>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog 
>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github 
>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn 
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book 
>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo XBean 4.18

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

By the way, tested without problem in Winegrower and Karaf.

Regards
JB

> Le 21 sept. 2020 à 08:34, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  a écrit :
> 
> +1 (non binding)
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
>> Le 21 sept. 2020 à 08:21, Romain Manni-Bucau > <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>> 
>> Hi everyone,
>> 
>> Here is the vote for xbean 4.18 which provides asm9 shade.
>> 
>> Here is the tag: 
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-4.18/ 
>> <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-4.18/> (rev 
>> 1881880)
>> Here is the staging repo: 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1126/ 
>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1126/>
>> Here is the dist area:  
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/ 
>> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/>
>> My Key is the same as last time.
>> 
>> Please vote:
>> 
>> [ ] +1 release it
>> [ ] -1 cause ${reason}
>> 
>> Vote will be open for 3 days or until we get enough bindings as usual.
>> 
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog 
>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog 
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github 
>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn 
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book 
>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo XBean 4.18

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 (non binding)

Regards
JB

> Le 21 sept. 2020 à 08:21, Romain Manni-Bucau  a écrit :
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Here is the vote for xbean 4.18 which provides asm9 shade.
> 
> Here is the tag: 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-4.18/ 
>  (rev 
> 1881880)
> Here is the staging repo: 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1126/ 
> 
> Here is the dist area:  
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/ 
> 
> My Key is the same as last time.
> 
> Please vote:
> 
> [ ] +1 release it
> [ ] -1 cause ${reason}
> 
> Vote will be open for 3 days or until we get enough bindings as usual.
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog 
>  | Old Blog 
>  | Github  
> | LinkedIn  | Book 
> 

Re: xbean asm 9

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1

I will test release in stage on different projects.

Thanks !
Regards
JB

> Le 21 sept. 2020 à 08:11, Romain Manni-Bucau  a écrit :
> 
> will start now
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog 
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog 
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> 
> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book 
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
> 
> Le mer. 16 sept. 2020 à 11:39, Jean-Baptiste Onofre  <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> a écrit :
> +1 it sounds good to me.
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
>> Le 16 sept. 2020 à 11:38, Romain Manni-Bucau > <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>> 
>> Hi everyone,
>> 
>> Upgraded our asm shade to asm 9 (beta for now).
>> 
>> If there is no issue, I'm planning to release it soon, please let me know if 
>> anything is blocking.
>> 
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog 
>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog 
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github 
>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn 
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book 
>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>

Re: xbean asm 9

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 it sounds good to me.

Regards
JB

> Le 16 sept. 2020 à 11:38, Romain Manni-Bucau  a écrit :
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Upgraded our asm shade to asm 9 (beta for now).
> 
> If there is no issue, I'm planning to release it soon, please let me know if 
> anything is blocking.
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog 
>  | Old Blog 
>  | Github  
> | LinkedIn  | Book 
> 

Re: [PROPOSAL] - website

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

It sounds good !

Regards
JB

> Le 8 mai 2020 à 23:38, Francois Papon  a écrit :
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to make a proposal about the Geronimo website
> (https://geronimo.apache.org).
> 
> I think the actual website can be simplified because as the Geronimo
> application server is no longer under maintenance, the main goal of the
> Geronimo project is to provider multiple sub-projects like:
> 
> - JavaEE/JakartaEE specifications
> 
> - XBean
> 
> - Microprofile implementation
> 
> - Arthur
> 
> - BatchEE
> 
> (may be more?)
> 
> All the subproject can provide their own documentation website and we
> could only have a one page for https://geronimo.apache.org to show a
> presentation of all sub-projects.
> 
> We could keep the old site for archives and add a link reference on the
> new one.
> 
> I started a proposal for a simple one page static site here:
> 
> https://openobject.fr/apache-geronimo/
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> regards,
> 
> -- 
> François
> fpa...@apache.org
> 
> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Specs JCDI_2.0 1.2, Annotation_1.3 1.3, AtInject_1.0 1.2, Interceptor_1.2 1.2, JSONP_1.1 1.4, JSONB_1.0 1.3

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 (non binding)

Regards
JB

> Le 28 avr. 2020 à 07:59, Romain Manni-Bucau  a écrit :
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Here is the vote for some of our spec with jakarta shades.
> 
> Tags:
> - 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec-1.2/
>  
> 
>  (rev 1877103)
> - 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.3_spec-1.3/
>  
> 
>  (rev 1877106)
> - 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.2/
>  
> 
>  (rev 1877109)
> - 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-interceptor_1.2_spec-1.2/
>  
> 
>  (rev 1877112)
> - 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-json_1.1_spec-1.4/
>  
> 
>  (rev 1877115)
> - 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsonb_1.0_spec-1.3/
>  
> 
>  (rev 1877118)
> Dist area: 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1124 
> 
> Staging repo: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/specs/ 
> 
> My key is still the same.
> 
> Please vote:
> 
> [ ] +1 release it
> [ ] -1 dont' release it ${cause}
> 
> Vote is open for 3 days or until we get enough bindings as usual.
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog 
>  | Old Blog 
>  | Github  
> | LinkedIn  | Book 
> 

Re: Jakarta artifacts?

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1

It sounds good. I can also help about the shading.

Regards
JB

> Le 28 avr. 2020 à 07:37, Romain Manni-Bucau  a écrit :
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Should we release jakarta artifacts?
> Short term I'm just expecting a shade added to the default artifact since for 
> now it is 1-1 and for jakarta9 we would do the new bundle/artifact as usual 
> probably (seems the less costly compromise to me).
> 
> If so (we do it now) I can take CDI SE stack + JSONB stack at my charge.
> Happy to get help if anyone is interested.
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog 
>  | Old Blog 
>  | Github  
> | LinkedIn  | Book 
> 

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo XBean 4.17

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 (non binding)

Regards
JB

> Le 27 avr. 2020 à 16:47, Romain Manni-Bucau  a écrit :
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Here is the vote for xbean 4.17 which provides asm8 shade.
> 
> Here is the tag: 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-4.17/ 
>  (rev 
> 1877082)
> Here is the staging repo: 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1123 
> 
> Here is the dist area: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/ 
> 
> My Key is the same than last time.
> 
> Please vote:
> 
> [ ] +1 release it
> [ ] -1 cause ${blocker}
> 
> Vote will be opened for 3 days or until we get enough bindings as usual.
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog 
>  | Old Blog 
>  | Github  
> | LinkedIn  | Book 
> 

Re: Asm 8

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

It sounds good to me. No objection.

Regards
JB

> Le 27 avr. 2020 à 15:49, Romain Manni-Bucau  a écrit :
> 
> Hello everyone,
> 
> should we do asm8 release?
> do we keep the xbean-asm8 (+ package) pattern?
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog 
>  | Old Blog 
>  | Github  
> | LinkedIn  | Book 
> 

Re: MetricRegistry impl

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

It sounds good, thanks !

Regards
JB

> Le 16 avr. 2020 à 14:59, Francois Papon  a 
> écrit :
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I pushed a PR to override the default methods of the MetricRegistry 
> implementation.
> The default methods will be removed from the specs in the next release.
> 
> https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/5 
> 
> 
> Here the jira:
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6769 
> 
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> regards,
> -- 
> François
> fpa...@apache.org 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Metrics 3.0-M2

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 (non binding)

Regards
JB

> Le 13 avr. 2020 à 17:22, Romain Manni-Bucau  a écrit :
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Here is the vote for our Microprofile Metrics implementation.
> It brings our compliance to v3.0-M2 spec and also provides jars without jaxrs 
> part of the impl.
> 
> Tag: 
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geronimo-metrics.git;a=commit;h=b870aff24346cde82415d808138239d8283f2fd7
>  
> 
> Dist area: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/metrics/ 
> 
> Staging repo: 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1122 
> 
> 
> Please vote:
> 
> [ ]+1
> [ ] -1 ${cause}
> 
> Vote will be opened as usual for 3 days or until we get enough binding votes.
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog 
>  | Old Blog 
>  | Github  
> | LinkedIn  | Book 
> 

Re: [VOTE] release Apache JPA-2.2 spec v1.1

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

+1 (non binding)

Regards
JB

> Le 14 mars 2020 à 08:53, Mark Struberg  a écrit :
> 
> Good morning!
> 
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache Geronimo JPA-2.2 spec API in 
> version 1.1.
> This is a maintenance release with just the automatic module name added in 
> the manifest file.
> 
> The staging repo is here:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1121 
> 
> 
> Sources are in 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1121/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec/1.1/
>  
> 
> sha1 is 270c2f063683fc394b9ec37ab2ffeaaaec086ef3
> 
> Note: This release requires geronimo-genesis 2.4 which is currently up for 
> vote in another thread.
> The staging repo for it is 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1120 
> 
> 
> 
> Please VOTE
> 
> [+1] yup, ship it
> [+0] meh, I don't care
> [-1] stop, there is a ${problem}
> 
> The VOTE is open for 72h.
> 
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
> 

Re: Release simple jcache soon?

[Jean-Baptiste Onofre]

It sounds good to me.

Regards
JB

> Le 13 févr. 2020 à 18:20, Romain Manni-Bucau  a écrit :
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I just activated bundle plugin to generate a manifest to enable to use our 
> simple jcache impl in OSGi.
> Any issue if we release it something like next week?
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6761 
>  for the main issue
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog 
>  | Old Blog 
>  | Github  
> | LinkedIn  | Book 
>