Derby JMX and Geronimo

2006-07-07 Thread Sanket Sharma

I don't know if this is the right place to talk about this, but I'm
working on adding JMX to derby. I had certain doubts in mind regarding
the whole GBean and MBean thing (I'm sure this would have been asked
several times before).
Will my calls to ManagementFactory.getPlatformMBean() work inside
Geronimo? I dont see a reason for them to not work, but just wanted to
confirm.
Further, what is there an interoperability between GBeans and MBeans?
Can I expose my MBeans from inside an GBean to expose the
management/monitoring interface or do I need to code some extra
stuff??

If I have a Derby jar with JMX built into it, will it break Geronimo's code?

Any help will be greatly appriciated.

Best Regards,
Sanket Sharma

On 7/7/06, John Sisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

In the "Derby library does not have line number debug information" mail
thread [1] a few weeks ago I asked whether people wanted to upgrade to
the Derby 10.1.3 maintenance release [2].

David Jencks was the only person who mentioned it should go in the 1.1.1
release but did not hear any objections from others.  If anyone
disagrees with this plan, please speak up before I start looking into
this next week.

John

[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@geronimo.apache.org/msg25051.html
[2]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-user/200607.mbox/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]




Derby/JMX and GBeans

2006-07-06 Thread Sanket Sharma

Hi,

I' writing JMX MBeans for Apache Derby and would like to know how
Geronimo handles calls to normal MBeans and getPlatformMBean.
One of my aims to make sure that Derby's MBeans integrate well into
existing JMX enabled containers. Therefore, instead of starting a new
MBean server for Derby, I would like to register Derby's MBeans in the
containers MBeanServer.

I looked at the Geronimo code and found that Derby is already
implemented as a GBean which can be managed within Geronimo. However,
the functionality is very limited. My MBeans expose much more stats
about derby and provide a lot more configurability.

I'm not very sure on this, but AFAIK, if I add MBeans to Derby via
normal JMX calls, they will appear in JConsole, but distinct from
Geronimo.
Therefore, If I do want to make these as part of GBean management, I
need to write wrapper calls around my MBeans and expose them as GBean
calls?

I have just started reading Geronimo's code and documentation and any
help would be greatly appriciated.

Thank you.

Best Regards,
Sanket Sharma


Re: Geronimo v1.1 Documentation

2006-04-30 Thread Sanket Sharma
Hi,I would like to contribute to other sections. Lets see.. Installations and Samples applications? Let me know if anything has higher priority.Regards,Sanket Sharma
On 4/29/06, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,This is the new tentative structure to cover the new Geronimo release1. Geronimo v1.1 - Summary of changes2. Geronimo v1.1 - New features3. Geronimo v1.1 - Installation4. Geronimo v1.1 - Administration
4.1. Geronimo v1.1 - Tools and Commands4.2. Geronimo v1.1 - Administration Console4.3. Geronimo v1.1 - Administrative tasks5. Geronimo v1.1 - Deployment plans6. Geronimo v1.1 - Sample applications
7. Geronimo v1.1 - Migrating applications from Geronimo v1.0I will start working on the Administration, are there any volunteers for the other sections?What other sections we should be adding?Here is the link to the confluence site
http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/Apache+Geronimo+V1.1+-+Documentation+DraftCheers!Hernan