[VOTE] #geronimo archive - to enable or not to enable?
Hi, It's not that important and likely doesn't require a separate vote, but as I was told it was decided to disable the archive bot of #geronimo. Therefore, I thought to send the email so that the matter is solved once and for all and won't be missed in the flow of messages in our mailboxes. [ ] +1 Yes, enable the bot - get the archive working again [ ] +/- 0 I don't care about it; do what you want [ ] -1 Don't turn it on; reasons included Jacek
Re: [VOTE] #geronimo archive - to enable or not to enable?
2006/1/8, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [X] +1 Yes, enable the bot - get the archive working again > [ ] +/- 0 I don't care about it; do what you want > [ ] -1 Don't turn it on; reasons included Jacek
Re: [VOTE] #geronimo archive - to enable or not to enable?
On 1/8/06, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not that important and likely doesn't require a separate vote,
> but as I was told it was decided to disable the archive bot of
> #geronimo. Therefore, I thought to send the email so that the matter
> is solved once and for all and won't be missed in the flow of messages
> in our mailboxes.
+1
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61Ehttp://geronimo.apache.org/)
Castor (http://castor.org/)
Re: [VOTE] #geronimo archive - to enable or not to enable?
+1 - sachin On Jan 8, 2006, at 8:38 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: Hi, It's not that important and likely doesn't require a separate vote, but as I was told it was decided to disable the archive bot of #geronimo. Therefore, I thought to send the email so that the matter is solved once and for all and won't be missed in the flow of messages in our mailboxes. [ ] +1 Yes, enable the bot - get the archive working again [ ] +/- 0 I don't care about it; do what you want [ ] -1 Don't turn it on; reasons included Jacek
Re: [VOTE] #geronimo archive - to enable or not to enable?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jacek Laskowski wrote, On 1/8/2006 5:38 AM: > Hi, > > It's not that important and likely doesn't require a separate vote, > but as I was told it was decided to disable the archive bot of > #geronimo. Therefore, I thought to send the email so that the matter > is solved once and for all and won't be missed in the flow of messages > in our mailboxes. > > [ ] +1 Yes, enable the bot - get the archive working again > [ ] +/- 0 I don't care about it; do what you want > [ ] -1 Don't turn it on; reasons included > > Jacek +1 Regards, Alan -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDwT7j1xC6qnMLUpYRAo2lAJ9sMUtt8WYVAUS47p8H5cUDJD4JOACggEiY hC41eUUI9rCuQ/bjb/H3OjE= =byQA -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [VOTE] #geronimo archive - to enable or not to enable?
[X ] +1 Yes, enable the bot - get the archive working again david jencks On Jan 8, 2006, at 5:38 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: Hi, It's not that important and likely doesn't require a separate vote, but as I was told it was decided to disable the archive bot of #geronimo. Therefore, I thought to send the email so that the matter is solved once and for all and won't be missed in the flow of messages in our mailboxes. [ ] +1 Yes, enable the bot - get the archive working again [ ] +/- 0 I don't care about it; do what you want [ ] -1 Don't turn it on; reasons included Jacek
Re: [VOTE] #geronimo archive - to enable or not to enable?
+1 Yes, enable the bot - get the archive working again On 1/8/06, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > It's not that important and likely doesn't require a separate vote, > but as I was told it was decided to disable the archive bot of > #geronimo. Therefore, I thought to send the email so that the matter > is solved once and for all and won't be missed in the flow of messages > in our mailboxes. > > [ ] +1 Yes, enable the bot - get the archive working again > [ ] +/- 0 I don't care about it; do what you want > [ ] -1 Don't turn it on; reasons included > > Jacek > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
Re: [VOTE] #geronimo archive - to enable or not to enable?
+1 Yes, enable the bot - get the archive working again John
Re: [VOTE] #geronimo archive - to enable or not to enable?
+1 enable the bot and Change the topic to tell people where to get the archives from Jacek Laskowski wrote: Hi, It's not that important and likely doesn't require a separate vote, but as I was told it was decided to disable the archive bot of #geronimo. Therefore, I thought to send the email so that the matter is solved once and for all and won't be missed in the flow of messages in our mailboxes. [ ] +1 Yes, enable the bot - get the archive working again [ ] +/- 0 I don't care about it; do what you want [ ] -1 Don't turn it on; reasons included Jacek
Re: [VOTE] #geronimo archive - to enable or not to enable?
+1 --jason -Original Message- From: Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:38:01 To:dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] #geronimo archive - to enable or not to enable? Hi, It's not that important and likely doesn't require a separate vote, but as I was told it was decided to disable the archive bot of #geronimo. Therefore, I thought to send the email so that the matter is solved once and for all and won't be missed in the flow of messages in our mailboxes. [ ] +1 Yes, enable the bot - get the archive working again [ ] +/- 0 I don't care about it; do what you want [ ] -1 Don't turn it on; reasons included Jacek
Re: [VOTE] #geronimo archive - to enable or not to enable?
+0 Sounds fine to me, won't die without it though :) -David On Jan 8, 2006, at 5:38 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: Hi, It's not that important and likely doesn't require a separate vote, but as I was told it was decided to disable the archive bot of #geronimo. Therefore, I thought to send the email so that the matter is solved once and for all and won't be missed in the flow of messages in our mailboxes. [ ] +1 Yes, enable the bot - get the archive working again [ ] +/- 0 I don't care about it; do what you want [ ] -1 Don't turn it on; reasons included Jacek
Re: [VOTE] #geronimo archive - to enable or not to enable?
+1 On 8 Jan 2006, at 13:38, Jacek Laskowski wrote: Hi, It's not that important and likely doesn't require a separate vote, but as I was told it was decided to disable the archive bot of #geronimo. Therefore, I thought to send the email so that the matter is solved once and for all and won't be missed in the flow of messages in our mailboxes. [ ] +1 Yes, enable the bot - get the archive working again [ ] +/- 0 I don't care about it; do what you want [ ] -1 Don't turn it on; reasons included Jacek James --- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ ___ Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Re: [VOTE] #geronimo archive - to enable or not to enable?
On Jan 8, 2006, at 8:38 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: Hi, It's not that important and likely doesn't require a separate vote, but as I was told it was decided to disable the archive bot of #geronimo. Therefore, I thought to send the email so that the matter is solved once and for all and won't be missed in the flow of messages in our mailboxes. [ ] +1 Yes, enable the bot - get the archive working again [ ] +/- 0 I don't care about it; do what you want [ ] -1 Don't turn it on; reasons included [X ] +1 Yes, enable the bot - get the archive working again --kevan
