[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4790) Migrate debug-views code to base on the up-to-date dojo
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rex Wang updated GERONIMO-4790: --- Attachment: jmx-viewer.jpg > Migrate debug-views code to base on the up-to-date dojo > --- > > Key: GERONIMO-4790 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4790 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Components: console >Affects Versions: 2.2 >Reporter: Rex Wang >Assignee: Rex Wang > Fix For: 2.2 > > Attachments: jmx-viewer.jpg > > > ref http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Which-dojo--p24293149s134.html > Currently, our console depends on two different versions of dojo library. One > is 1.3.0, which is used by EJB portlet and just updated from 1.2.1 > (GERONIMO-4723) and fixed a bug(GERONIMO-4746). I hope we can go on updating > it to the latest version 1.3.2. > The other one is 0.4.3, the legacy lib, which has not been supported by dojo > team, but used by our debug-view portlets, I prefer to update it to the > latest lib, and the advantage are as follows: > 1. keep consistent in the portlet page style with the EJB portlet > 2. reduce a bit to the geronimo footprint size > 3. Although we have ported the dojo-legacy to build the source in > external(GERONIMO-4750), with this update, we don't need that as well. > 4. will be more easy to maintainance the program logic by using the unified > dojo lib. > 5. the doc of 1.3.x is good and easy to find. > There are also some risks: > 1. There has been so much changes between the dojo versions that the effort > might be 1-2 week to complete. > 2. I did not find any documents for the old dojo lib, so it might be easier > to re-write the whole pages to base on 1.3.x and dwr 3.0.x(we have upgrade > the dwr successfully in GERONIMO-4753), but I not sure. > Any thoughts? > -Rex -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4790) Migrate debug-views code to base on the up-to-date dojo
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rex Wang updated GERONIMO-4790: --- Attachment: ldap-viewer.jpg > Migrate debug-views code to base on the up-to-date dojo > --- > > Key: GERONIMO-4790 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4790 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Components: console >Affects Versions: 2.2 >Reporter: Rex Wang >Assignee: Rex Wang > Fix For: 2.2 > > Attachments: jmx-viewer.jpg, ldap-viewer.jpg > > > ref http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Which-dojo--p24293149s134.html > Currently, our console depends on two different versions of dojo library. One > is 1.3.0, which is used by EJB portlet and just updated from 1.2.1 > (GERONIMO-4723) and fixed a bug(GERONIMO-4746). I hope we can go on updating > it to the latest version 1.3.2. > The other one is 0.4.3, the legacy lib, which has not been supported by dojo > team, but used by our debug-view portlets, I prefer to update it to the > latest lib, and the advantage are as follows: > 1. keep consistent in the portlet page style with the EJB portlet > 2. reduce a bit to the geronimo footprint size > 3. Although we have ported the dojo-legacy to build the source in > external(GERONIMO-4750), with this update, we don't need that as well. > 4. will be more easy to maintainance the program logic by using the unified > dojo lib. > 5. the doc of 1.3.x is good and easy to find. > There are also some risks: > 1. There has been so much changes between the dojo versions that the effort > might be 1-2 week to complete. > 2. I did not find any documents for the old dojo lib, so it might be easier > to re-write the whole pages to base on 1.3.x and dwr 3.0.x(we have upgrade > the dwr successfully in GERONIMO-4753), but I not sure. > Any thoughts? > -Rex -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4790) Migrate debug-views code to base on the up-to-date dojo
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rex Wang updated GERONIMO-4790: --- Attachment: classloader-viewer.jpg > Migrate debug-views code to base on the up-to-date dojo > --- > > Key: GERONIMO-4790 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4790 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Components: console >Affects Versions: 2.2 >Reporter: Rex Wang >Assignee: Rex Wang > Fix For: 2.2 > > Attachments: classloader-viewer.jpg, jmx-viewer.jpg, JNDI-viewer.jpg, > ldap-viewer.jpg > > > ref http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Which-dojo--p24293149s134.html > Currently, our console depends on two different versions of dojo library. One > is 1.3.0, which is used by EJB portlet and just updated from 1.2.1 > (GERONIMO-4723) and fixed a bug(GERONIMO-4746). I hope we can go on updating > it to the latest version 1.3.2. > The other one is 0.4.3, the legacy lib, which has not been supported by dojo > team, but used by our debug-view portlets, I prefer to update it to the > latest lib, and the advantage are as follows: > 1. keep consistent in the portlet page style with the EJB portlet > 2. reduce a bit to the geronimo footprint size > 3. Although we have ported the dojo-legacy to build the source in > external(GERONIMO-4750), with this update, we don't need that as well. > 4. will be more easy to maintainance the program logic by using the unified > dojo lib. > 5. the doc of 1.3.x is good and easy to find. > There are also some risks: > 1. There has been so much changes between the dojo versions that the effort > might be 1-2 week to complete. > 2. I did not find any documents for the old dojo lib, so it might be easier > to re-write the whole pages to base on 1.3.x and dwr 3.0.x(we have upgrade > the dwr successfully in GERONIMO-4753), but I not sure. > Any thoughts? > -Rex -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4790) Migrate debug-views code to base on the up-to-date dojo
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rex Wang updated GERONIMO-4790: --- Attachment: JNDI-viewer.jpg > Migrate debug-views code to base on the up-to-date dojo > --- > > Key: GERONIMO-4790 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4790 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Components: console >Affects Versions: 2.2 >Reporter: Rex Wang >Assignee: Rex Wang > Fix For: 2.2 > > Attachments: classloader-viewer.jpg, jmx-viewer.jpg, JNDI-viewer.jpg, > ldap-viewer.jpg > > > ref http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Which-dojo--p24293149s134.html > Currently, our console depends on two different versions of dojo library. One > is 1.3.0, which is used by EJB portlet and just updated from 1.2.1 > (GERONIMO-4723) and fixed a bug(GERONIMO-4746). I hope we can go on updating > it to the latest version 1.3.2. > The other one is 0.4.3, the legacy lib, which has not been supported by dojo > team, but used by our debug-view portlets, I prefer to update it to the > latest lib, and the advantage are as follows: > 1. keep consistent in the portlet page style with the EJB portlet > 2. reduce a bit to the geronimo footprint size > 3. Although we have ported the dojo-legacy to build the source in > external(GERONIMO-4750), with this update, we don't need that as well. > 4. will be more easy to maintainance the program logic by using the unified > dojo lib. > 5. the doc of 1.3.x is good and easy to find. > There are also some risks: > 1. There has been so much changes between the dojo versions that the effort > might be 1-2 week to complete. > 2. I did not find any documents for the old dojo lib, so it might be easier > to re-write the whole pages to base on 1.3.x and dwr 3.0.x(we have upgrade > the dwr successfully in GERONIMO-4753), but I not sure. > Any thoughts? > -Rex -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4790) Migrate debug-views code to base on the up-to-date dojo
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rex Wang updated GERONIMO-4790: --- Attachment: dependency-viewer.jpg > Migrate debug-views code to base on the up-to-date dojo > --- > > Key: GERONIMO-4790 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4790 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Components: console >Affects Versions: 2.2 >Reporter: Rex Wang >Assignee: Rex Wang > Fix For: 2.2 > > Attachments: classloader-viewer.jpg, dependency-viewer.jpg, > jmx-viewer.jpg, JNDI-viewer.jpg, ldap-viewer.jpg > > > ref http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Which-dojo--p24293149s134.html > Currently, our console depends on two different versions of dojo library. One > is 1.3.0, which is used by EJB portlet and just updated from 1.2.1 > (GERONIMO-4723) and fixed a bug(GERONIMO-4746). I hope we can go on updating > it to the latest version 1.3.2. > The other one is 0.4.3, the legacy lib, which has not been supported by dojo > team, but used by our debug-view portlets, I prefer to update it to the > latest lib, and the advantage are as follows: > 1. keep consistent in the portlet page style with the EJB portlet > 2. reduce a bit to the geronimo footprint size > 3. Although we have ported the dojo-legacy to build the source in > external(GERONIMO-4750), with this update, we don't need that as well. > 4. will be more easy to maintainance the program logic by using the unified > dojo lib. > 5. the doc of 1.3.x is good and easy to find. > There are also some risks: > 1. There has been so much changes between the dojo versions that the effort > might be 1-2 week to complete. > 2. I did not find any documents for the old dojo lib, so it might be easier > to re-write the whole pages to base on 1.3.x and dwr 3.0.x(we have upgrade > the dwr successfully in GERONIMO-4753), but I not sure. > Any thoughts? > -Rex -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
