Re: Apache Con US '09 Geronimo Track
Is Geronimo performance tuning a good topic to cover? I guess we don't have some nice materials on this topic currently? -Jack On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Forrest_Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote: I think the ease of use character of Geronimo is better to be worded in the general description. The convenient admin console is definitely a bright spot compared to other open source java application servers. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Apache-Con-US-%2709-Geronimo-Track-tp24470102s134p24509217.html Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Apache Con US '09 Geronimo Track
On Jul 16, 2009, at 2:33 AM, Jack Cai wrote: Is Geronimo performance tuning a good topic to cover? I guess we don't have some nice materials on this topic currently? Sure. All good potential topics. We don't have to list all potential topics. Thanks for the feedback, all. --kevan
Re: Apache Con US '09 Geronimo Track
On Jul 14, 2009, at 10:59 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: Sorry ... I think you should just consider the lack of comments to be silent approval :-). I was, just giving people a reminder... I really am fine with it just as it is worded. However, here are some other thoughts. - Do we need to clearly state that Geronimo delivers (out of the box) a fully compliant Java EE Server in addition to stating that the plugins can be used to assemble one? No. Was kind of thinking ahead to the track description, not just the call for papers. Don't think it hurts. So, will leave it... - In listing the subprojects should we mention JavaMail, Component and Transaction support? Sure. 'etc' was easier than typing. ;-) They are certainly more interesting than 'Specs'... - Do we want to mention anything about choice in core server components when building server configurations - for example support for both Tomcat and Jetty or CXF and Axis2? One other potential topic - custom server assemblies Agreed. Updated version... * Apache Geronimo is a lightweight, flexible, component-based server for building dynamic application server environments. Geronimo plugins can be assembled into a fully compliant Java EE Server. However, it can be easily assembled into a server providing a subset of functionality or a minimal subset required to meet the requirements of a set of applications. In addition to the Apache Geronimo Server, the Geronimo project is also comprised of a number of subprojects: Development Tools, XBean, Yoko, GShell, JavaMail, Connector/Transaction, etc. Potential topics for the Geronimo Track include, but are in no way limited to: * Geronimo architecture, * Systems management, * Custom server assemblies, * Application development and user experiences, * OSGi Blueprint, * Kernel restructuring, * Java EE 6, * etc. * --kevan
Re: Apache Con US '09 Geronimo Track
I think the ease of use character of Geronimo is better to be worded in the general description. The convenient admin console is definitely a bright spot compared to other open source java application servers. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Apache-Con-US-%2709-Geronimo-Track-tp24470102s134p24509217.html Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Apache Con US '09 Geronimo Track
On 07/13/2009 11:53 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: All, There will be a Geronimo Track at ApacheCon US '09. We will be sharing a full day with the Directory Project. This means that we'll have 2 to 3 50 minute time slots. We have some flexibility on how we format these time slots. So, IIUC, we can sub-divide these time slots, if we desire. I've put together the following proposed Track Description. Comments much appreciated. I'd like to settle on the track description quickly, if possible. And hope we can start discussing talk proposals and track formats, real soon. planner hat on ASAP :-) /planner hat on Cheers Jean-Frederic
Re: Apache Con US '09 Geronimo Track
Comments, anybody? I'm hoping to get started with this tomorrow... --kevan On Jul 13, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: All, There will be a Geronimo Track at ApacheCon US '09. We will be sharing a full day with the Directory Project. This means that we'll have 2 to 3 50 minute time slots. We have some flexibility on how we format these time slots. So, IIUC, we can sub-divide these time slots, if we desire. I've put together the following proposed Track Description. Comments much appreciated. I'd like to settle on the track description quickly, if possible. And hope we can start discussing talk proposals and track formats, real soon. * Apache Geronimo is a lightweight, flexible, component-based server for building dynamic application server environments. Geronimo plugins can be assembled into a fully compliant Java EE Server. However, it can be easily assembled into a server providing a subset of functionality or a minimal subset required to meet the requirements of a set of applications. In addition to the Apache Geronimo Server, the Geronimo project is also comprised of a number of subprojects: Development Tools, XBean, Yoko, GShell, Specs, etc. Potential topics for the Geronimo Track include, but are in no way limited to: * Geronimo architecture, * Systems management, * Application development and user experiences, * OSGi Blueprint, * Kernel restructuring, * Java EE 6, * etc. * Please let me know your thoughts on the above. Also, please start thinking about potential talks. However, please don't start making specific talk proposals, yet. Finally, we will need to discuss our selection process for talk proposals. I would prefer that we reach our talk decisions on our public mailing list, rather than our private@ mailing list. This could be a bit sensitive, however. So, I would appreciate your thoughts. If we're concerned about potential harm this might cause, it's possible that some sort of anonymous vote could be held. --kevan
Re: Apache Con US '09 Geronimo Track
Sorry ... I think you should just consider the lack of comments to be silent approval :-). I really am fine with it just as it is worded. However, here are some other thoughts. - Do we need to clearly state that Geronimo delivers (out of the box) a fully compliant Java EE Server in addition to stating that the plugins can be used to assemble one? - In listing the subprojects should we mention JavaMail, Component and Transaction support? - Do we want to mention anything about choice in core server components when building server configurations - for example support for both Tomcat and Jetty or CXF and Axis2? One other potential topic - custom server assemblies Thanks for driving this! Joe Kevan Miller wrote: All, There will be a Geronimo Track at ApacheCon US '09. We will be sharing a full day with the Directory Project. This means that we'll have 2 to 3 50 minute time slots. We have some flexibility on how we format these time slots. So, IIUC, we can sub-divide these time slots, if we desire. I've put together the following proposed Track Description. Comments much appreciated. I'd like to settle on the track description quickly, if possible. And hope we can start discussing talk proposals and track formats, real soon. * Apache Geronimo is a lightweight, flexible, component-based server for building dynamic application server environments. Geronimo plugins can be assembled into a fully compliant Java EE Server. However, it can be easily assembled into a server providing a subset of functionality or a minimal subset required to meet the requirements of a set of applications. In addition to the Apache Geronimo Server, the Geronimo project is also comprised of a number of subprojects: Development Tools, XBean, Yoko, GShell, Specs, etc. Potential topics for the Geronimo Track include, but are in no way limited to: * Geronimo architecture, * Systems management, * Application development and user experiences, * OSGi Blueprint, * Kernel restructuring, * Java EE 6, * etc. * Please let me know your thoughts on the above. Also, please start thinking about potential talks. However, please don't start making specific talk proposals, yet. Finally, we will need to discuss our selection process for talk proposals. I would prefer that we reach our talk decisions on our public mailing list, rather than our private@ mailing list. This could be a bit sensitive, however. So, I would appreciate your thoughts. If we're concerned about potential harm this might cause, it's possible that some sort of anonymous vote could be held. --kevan
Apache Con US '09 Geronimo Track
All, There will be a Geronimo Track at ApacheCon US '09. We will be sharing a full day with the Directory Project. This means that we'll have 2 to 3 50 minute time slots. We have some flexibility on how we format these time slots. So, IIUC, we can sub-divide these time slots, if we desire. I've put together the following proposed Track Description. Comments much appreciated. I'd like to settle on the track description quickly, if possible. And hope we can start discussing talk proposals and track formats, real soon. * Apache Geronimo is a lightweight, flexible, component-based server for building dynamic application server environments. Geronimo plugins can be assembled into a fully compliant Java EE Server. However, it can be easily assembled into a server providing a subset of functionality or a minimal subset required to meet the requirements of a set of applications. In addition to the Apache Geronimo Server, the Geronimo project is also comprised of a number of subprojects: Development Tools, XBean, Yoko, GShell, Specs, etc. Potential topics for the Geronimo Track include, but are in no way limited to: * Geronimo architecture, * Systems management, * Application development and user experiences, * OSGi Blueprint, * Kernel restructuring, * Java EE 6, * etc. * Please let me know your thoughts on the above. Also, please start thinking about potential talks. However, please don't start making specific talk proposals, yet. Finally, we will need to discuss our selection process for talk proposals. I would prefer that we reach our talk decisions on our public mailing list, rather than our private@ mailing list. This could be a bit sensitive, however. So, I would appreciate your thoughts. If we're concerned about potential harm this might cause, it's possible that some sort of anonymous vote could be held. --kevan
