Re: Geronimo v1.2 documentation - Pending Items
Sure, I'll take a look at JMS Conf. I will also start verifying/modifying the EJB sample App and subsequently look into the others. Regards Karthiga On 2/8/07, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That would be great. So far I have only verified/modified 3 out of 14. Hopefully I'll give a shot to the WS one some time today. Feel free to work on any of the remaining 10, just add "(1.2 Ok)" once updated/verified at the title's end for easy tracking. I have also pending for v1.2 documentation the "Summary of changes" (which I'll wait till the final cut is out) and "JMS configuration". Want to take a look at JMS conf? You guys are already working on the 1.2 plans and schemas, right? Cheers! Hernan Karthiga Ratnam wrote: > Hi Hernan, > > I would like to volunteer to test and update the pending apps in v1.2 > documentation. Some of the samples have been Okayed. I would like to > start testing on the others. > > Any thoughts? > > > Thanks > > Karthiga
Re: Geronimo v1.2 documentation - Pending Items
That would be great. So far I have only verified/modified 3 out of 14. Hopefully I'll give a shot to the WS one some time today. Feel free to work on any of the remaining 10, just add "(1.2 Ok)" once updated/verified at the title's end for easy tracking. I have also pending for v1.2 documentation the "Summary of changes" (which I'll wait till the final cut is out) and "JMS configuration". Want to take a look at JMS conf? You guys are already working on the 1.2 plans and schemas, right? Cheers! Hernan Karthiga Ratnam wrote: Hi Hernan, I would like to volunteer to test and update the pending apps in v1.2 documentation. Some of the samples have been Okayed. I would like to start testing on the others. Any thoughts? Thanks Karthiga
Geronimo v1.2 documentation - Pending Items
Hi Hernan, I would like to volunteer to test and update the pending apps in v1.2documentation. Some of the samples have been Okayed. I would like to start testing on the others. Any thoughts? Thanks Karthiga
Re: Geronimo v1.2 documentation
Yeah, that's the first I found from the list, at that time I was using the beta RC that's why the "revision" instead of snapshot. Either way, it's not that the people reading it wont understand, but rather it's because it will look better. Plus, if for any reason you fail following those instructions then you, as a user, will get the feeling that the entire documentation is not reflecting the actual status of the software released. So far, the doc may no be complete but at least reflects what's in the final release and I would prefer to keep it this way (hopefully more complete) for the upcoming releases. Cheers! Hernan Jason Dillon wrote: Sorta, though these don't have snapshot in them :-P The only way to fix these types of versions is to run the build as 1.2... which I guess you can do, but I still don't recommend. I would hope that our users would be smart enough to figure this out with out needing to make a mock 1.2 release simply for screen shots. Anyways, I just wanted and example of where the version was that you wanted changed. --jason On Dec 11, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Here is an example http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/29983/InstApp2.jpg Is this the kind of screenshot you are looking for? Cheers! Hernan Jason Dillon wrote: Mmmkay, well then how about the URL on the console which has the snapshot you want to remove. I'm just curious where this snapshot is that is causing you problems. --jason On Dec 11, 2006, at 2:01 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: That's the point, you wont find it ;-) For those articles where I could not get rid of the SNAPSHOT I left them for developing later on. Cheers! Hernan Jason Dillon wrote: Can you point me at a specific screenshot which has the offending snapshot muck in it? --jason On Dec 11, 2006, at 7:46 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Hi All, I updated most of the Geronimo v1.2 doc. I couldn't get rid of the *SNAPSHOT* for some screen captures so I guess it will be better to wait till the "snapshot" is removed from the build to finish updating those articles. I listed at the top of the page those articles that have not been updated yet. Here is the link http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC12/documentation.html Comments welcome! Help wanted! ;-) Cheers! Hernan
Re: Geronimo v1.2 documentation
Sorta, though these don't have snapshot in them :-P The only way to fix these types of versions is to run the build as 1.2... which I guess you can do, but I still don't recommend. I would hope that our users would be smart enough to figure this out with out needing to make a mock 1.2 release simply for screen shots. Anyways, I just wanted and example of where the version was that you wanted changed. --jason On Dec 11, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Here is an example http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/29983/ InstApp2.jpg Is this the kind of screenshot you are looking for? Cheers! Hernan Jason Dillon wrote: Mmmkay, well then how about the URL on the console which has the snapshot you want to remove. I'm just curious where this snapshot is that is causing you problems. --jason On Dec 11, 2006, at 2:01 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: That's the point, you wont find it ;-) For those articles where I could not get rid of the SNAPSHOT I left them for developing later on. Cheers! Hernan Jason Dillon wrote: Can you point me at a specific screenshot which has the offending snapshot muck in it? --jason On Dec 11, 2006, at 7:46 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Hi All, I updated most of the Geronimo v1.2 doc. I couldn't get rid of the *SNAPSHOT* for some screen captures so I guess it will be better to wait till the "snapshot" is removed from the build to finish updating those articles. I listed at the top of the page those articles that have not been updated yet. Here is the link http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC12/ documentation.html Comments welcome! Help wanted! ;-) Cheers! Hernan
Re: Geronimo v1.2 documentation
Here is an example http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/29983/InstApp2.jpg Is this the kind of screenshot you are looking for? Cheers! Hernan Jason Dillon wrote: Mmmkay, well then how about the URL on the console which has the snapshot you want to remove. I'm just curious where this snapshot is that is causing you problems. --jason On Dec 11, 2006, at 2:01 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: That's the point, you wont find it ;-) For those articles where I could not get rid of the SNAPSHOT I left them for developing later on. Cheers! Hernan Jason Dillon wrote: Can you point me at a specific screenshot which has the offending snapshot muck in it? --jason On Dec 11, 2006, at 7:46 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Hi All, I updated most of the Geronimo v1.2 doc. I couldn't get rid of the *SNAPSHOT* for some screen captures so I guess it will be better to wait till the "snapshot" is removed from the build to finish updating those articles. I listed at the top of the page those articles that have not been updated yet. Here is the link http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC12/documentation.html Comments welcome! Help wanted! ;-) Cheers! Hernan
Re: Geronimo v1.2 documentation
Mmmkay, well then how about the URL on the console which has the snapshot you want to remove. I'm just curious where this snapshot is that is causing you problems. --jason On Dec 11, 2006, at 2:01 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote: That's the point, you wont find it ;-) For those articles where I could not get rid of the SNAPSHOT I left them for developing later on. Cheers! Hernan Jason Dillon wrote: Can you point me at a specific screenshot which has the offending snapshot muck in it? --jason On Dec 11, 2006, at 7:46 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Hi All, I updated most of the Geronimo v1.2 doc. I couldn't get rid of the *SNAPSHOT* for some screen captures so I guess it will be better to wait till the "snapshot" is removed from the build to finish updating those articles. I listed at the top of the page those articles that have not been updated yet. Here is the link http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC12/ documentation.html Comments welcome! Help wanted! ;-) Cheers! Hernan
Re: Geronimo v1.2 documentation
That's the point, you wont find it ;-) For those articles where I could not get rid of the SNAPSHOT I left them for developing later on. Cheers! Hernan Jason Dillon wrote: Can you point me at a specific screenshot which has the offending snapshot muck in it? --jason On Dec 11, 2006, at 7:46 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Hi All, I updated most of the Geronimo v1.2 doc. I couldn't get rid of the *SNAPSHOT* for some screen captures so I guess it will be better to wait till the "snapshot" is removed from the build to finish updating those articles. I listed at the top of the page those articles that have not been updated yet. Here is the link http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC12/documentation.html Comments welcome! Help wanted! ;-) Cheers! Hernan
Re: Geronimo v1.2 documentation
Can you point me at a specific screenshot which has the offending snapshot muck in it? --jason On Dec 11, 2006, at 7:46 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote: Hi All, I updated most of the Geronimo v1.2 doc. I couldn't get rid of the *SNAPSHOT* for some screen captures so I guess it will be better to wait till the "snapshot" is removed from the build to finish updating those articles. I listed at the top of the page those articles that have not been updated yet. Here is the link http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC12/documentation.html Comments welcome! Help wanted! ;-) Cheers! Hernan
Geronimo v1.2 documentation
Hi All, I updated most of the Geronimo v1.2 doc. I couldn't get rid of the *SNAPSHOT* for some screen captures so I guess it will be better to wait till the "snapshot" is removed from the build to finish updating those articles. I listed at the top of the page those articles that have not been updated yet. Here is the link http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC12/documentation.html Comments welcome! Help wanted! ;-) Cheers! Hernan
Re: Geronimo v1.2 documentation - Summary of changes
Hernan Cunico wrote: Hi All, For this release I would like to ask you guys to throw a line or two listing the areas your worked on that represent new or improved features. In the past I used to dig into the JIRAs but that took forever and always felt I was missing a lot. So, this time it would be great to hear it "directly from the horse's mouth". ;-) Let's try consolidate in this thread a list with all the new features, updates and improvements. Thanks in advance. Cheers! Hernan This is a good idea. The Apache HTTP Server maintains a file named "CHANGES" in the top level of each server branch in SVN for this purpose. Check it out here: http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/CHANGES_2.2 When a developer commits an interesting change (from an Apache HTTPD user's perspective), he will check in a quick description in CHANGES at the same time. Apache HTTPD users know to check out the CHANGES files to get a quick rundown on a new release. This is a practice worthy of emulating, in my biased humble opinion :-) Notes: - CHANGES grows as a stack, with newer stuff at the beginning of the file - Security fixes are prefixed with the word "SECURITY:" Tracking security fixes in the CHANGES file with this simple convention eliminates an amazing number of user questions. Bill
Re: Geronimo v1.2 documentation
Hi Hernan, Thanks for the explanation. As you suggested I will continue my work with G 1.1 documentation and update it later in to the 1.2. Thanks, Lasantha Ranaweera > Hi Lasantha, > this should not affect your present work. Since G v1.2 release is getting > closer I thought it would be better to focus updating the doc for this, > more stable candidate. > > Feel free to continue rounding up your current articles for v1.1.1 and > whenever you think they are ready it would be great to get them updated to > G v1.2 > > Cheers! > Hernan > > Lasantha Ranaweera wrote: >> Hi Hernan, >> >> I have been currently working on JBoss -> Geronimo migration samples in >> 1.1 documentation. Please let me know how does this going to affect my >> work? >> >> Thanks, >> Lasantha Ranaweera >> >> Hernan Cunico wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> I'm updating the existing documentation to v1.2, here is the link. >>> >>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC12/documentation.html >>> >>> Are there any specific topics that you guys would like to see covered >>> for v1.2 first? I'll try to focus on the top priorities first. >>> >>> As usual, help with the doc will be greatly appreciated. >>> >>> Cheers! >>> Hernan >>> >> >> >
Re: Geronimo v1.2 documentation
Hi Hernan, Thnaks for the explanation. As you suggested I will continue my work with G 1.1 documentation and update it later in to the 1.2. Thanks, Lasantha Ranaweera > Hi Lasantha, > this should not affect your present work. Since G v1.2 release is getting > closer I thought it would be better to focus updating the doc for this, > more stable candidate. > > Feel free to continue rounding up your current articles for v1.1.1 and > whenever you think they are ready it would be great to get them updated to > G v1.2 > > Cheers! > Hernan > > Lasantha Ranaweera wrote: >> Hi Hernan, >> >> I have been currently working on JBoss -> Geronimo migration samples in >> 1.1 documentation. Please let me know how does this going to affect my >> work? >> >> Thanks, >> Lasantha Ranaweera >> >> Hernan Cunico wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> I'm updating the existing documentation to v1.2, here is the link. >>> >>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC12/documentation.html >>> >>> Are there any specific topics that you guys would like to see covered >>> for v1.2 first? I'll try to focus on the top priorities first. >>> >>> As usual, help with the doc will be greatly appreciated. >>> >>> Cheers! >>> Hernan >>> >> >> >
Geronimo v1.2 documentation - Summary of changes
Hi All, For this release I would like to ask you guys to throw a line or two listing the areas your worked on that represent new or improved features. In the past I used to dig into the JIRAs but that took forever and always felt I was missing a lot. So, this time it would be great to hear it "directly from the horse's mouth". ;-) Let's try consolidate in this thread a list with all the new features, updates and improvements. Thanks in advance. Cheers! Hernan
Re: Geronimo v1.2 documentation
As I said, this doc update should not get in your way to finish whatever you are currently working on for G v1.1.1. I think it would be better to have those doc you guys are working on finished before jumping to v1.2 doc. I "branched" v1.1 doc, that's the GMOxDOC12 space. I removed all the translations from this space in an attempt to reduce the footprint. Later on I will create a separate space to hold the translations. If we manage to get all the content updated before the G v1.2 release and the exported doc footprint is not too big I think it would be cool to ship it in or along with G v1.2 ( like a separate .zip or something ) I will start another thread to identify all the new/improved stuff we included in this new release (a.k.a. Summary of changes) Cheers! Hernan Kanchana Welagedara wrote: Hi Hernan As Lasantha said there pending documentations which are in progress of writting for GV1.1.1 .My idea was to complete the on going stuff to set in GV1.1.1 and finish those while we match GV1.2 for any of the newly starting documents. Would like to know your thoughts about this.Also how do we do the v1.1.1 to V1.2 migration? Regards Kanchana On 12/1/06, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi All, I'm updating the existing documentation to v1.2, here is the link. http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC12/documentation.html Are there any specific topics that you guys would like to see covered for v1.2 first? I'll try to focus on the top priorities first. As usual, help with the doc will be greatly appreciated. Cheers! Hernan
Re: Geronimo v1.2 documentation
Hi Lasantha, this should not affect your present work. Since G v1.2 release is getting closer I thought it would be better to focus updating the doc for this, more stable candidate. Feel free to continue rounding up your current articles for v1.1.1 and whenever you think they are ready it would be great to get them updated to G v1.2 Cheers! Hernan Lasantha Ranaweera wrote: Hi Hernan, I have been currently working on JBoss -> Geronimo migration samples in 1.1 documentation. Please let me know how does this going to affect my work? Thanks, Lasantha Ranaweera Hernan Cunico wrote: Hi All, I'm updating the existing documentation to v1.2, here is the link. http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC12/documentation.html Are there any specific topics that you guys would like to see covered for v1.2 first? I'll try to focus on the top priorities first. As usual, help with the doc will be greatly appreciated. Cheers! Hernan
Re: Geronimo v1.2 documentation
Hi Hernan As Lasantha said there pending documentations which are in progress of writting for GV1.1.1 .My idea was to complete the on going stuff to set in GV1.1.1 and finish those while we match GV1.2 for any of the newly starting documents. Would like to know your thoughts about this.Also how do we do the v1.1.1 to V1.2 migration? Regards Kanchana On 12/1/06, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi All, I'm updating the existing documentation to v1.2, here is the link. http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC12/documentation.html Are there any specific topics that you guys would like to see covered for v1.2 first? I'll try to focus on the top priorities first. As usual, help with the doc will be greatly appreciated. Cheers! Hernan
Re: Geronimo v1.2 documentation
Hi Hernan, I have been currently working on JBoss -> Geronimo migration samples in 1.1 documentation. Please let me know how does this going to affect my work? Thanks, Lasantha Ranaweera Hernan Cunico wrote: Hi All, I'm updating the existing documentation to v1.2, here is the link. http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC12/documentation.html Are there any specific topics that you guys would like to see covered for v1.2 first? I'll try to focus on the top priorities first. As usual, help with the doc will be greatly appreciated. Cheers! Hernan
Re: Geronimo v1.2 documentation
Hi I'm presently working on GV1.1.1 but will work on for GV1.2 for the newly starting documents. Regards Kanchana On 12/1/06, Karthiga Ratnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi All, I'm in for Geronimo documentation updation. Best Regards Karthiga Technical Writer Lanka Software Foundation Sri Lanka On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 14:32 -0500, Hernan Cunico wrote: > Hi All, > I'm updating the existing documentation to v1.2, here is the link. > > http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC12/documentation.html > > Are there any specific topics that you guys would like to see covered for v1.2 first? I'll try to focus on the top priorities first. > > As usual, help with the doc will be greatly appreciated. > > Cheers! > Hernan
Geronimo v1.2 documentation
Hi All, I'm updating the existing documentation to v1.2, here is the link. http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC12/documentation.html Are there any specific topics that you guys would like to see covered for v1.2 first? I'll try to focus on the top priorities first. As usual, help with the doc will be greatly appreciated. Cheers! Hernan
Re: Geronimo v1.2 documentation
Hi Kanchana, I know we have a long way to go with the schemas. I was just asking for user feedback so we know whether we are on track or not ;-) Cheers! Hernan Kanchana Welagedara wrote: Hi Hernan http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/geronimo-application-11xsd.html In this document there are plenty of of format to finish.Except for matting issue do u think the content are enough for xml schema or should it be more descriptive? Regards Kanchana On 8/29/06, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks a lot for the feedback Adding to the list: - config.xml - deployment plans We are currently working on documenting the schemas for v1.1, well just starting ;-) It would be great if we can get your feedback on these articles. Cheers! Hernan raxpl wrote: > a hyperlinked listing of config. xml tags (properties) and the possible > values and what they achieve...for things like geronimo-web.xml (ideally > kept up to date as a core bit of documentation) > - well this is asking for a lot but i work a lot on Adobe Flex and i got > that out of the box (but it's expensive so they can afford documentation > teams) > But that's the big challenge when you've got all the simple tutorial apps > etc. working...how do i get to grips with rest of the behemoth ! > > > Hernan Cunico wrote: >> Hi All, >> I would like to initiate a thread for discussing the topics to cover in >> the Geronimo v1.2 documentation. >> >> The idea is to build a prioritized list and then derive it into a TOC. >> >> What would you guys like to see in the Geronimo v1.2 doc? >> >> Cheers! >> Hernan >> >> >
Re: Geronimo v1.2 documentation
Hi Hernan http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/geronimo-application-11xsd.html In this document there are plenty of of format to finish.Except for matting issue do u think the content are enough for xml schema or should it be more descriptive? Regards Kanchana On 8/29/06, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks a lot for the feedback Adding to the list: - config.xml - deployment plans We are currently working on documenting the schemas for v1.1, well just starting ;-) It would be great if we can get your feedback on these articles. Cheers! Hernan raxpl wrote: > a hyperlinked listing of config. xml tags (properties) and the possible > values and what they achieve...for things like geronimo-web.xml (ideally > kept up to date as a core bit of documentation) > - well this is asking for a lot but i work a lot on Adobe Flex and i got > that out of the box (but it's expensive so they can afford documentation > teams) > But that's the big challenge when you've got all the simple tutorial apps > etc. working...how do i get to grips with rest of the behemoth ! > > > Hernan Cunico wrote: >> Hi All, >> I would like to initiate a thread for discussing the topics to cover in >> the Geronimo v1.2 documentation. >> >> The idea is to build a prioritized list and then derive it into a TOC. >> >> What would you guys like to see in the Geronimo v1.2 doc? >> >> Cheers! >> Hernan >> >> >
Re: Geronimo v1.2 documentation
Thanks a lot for the feedback Adding to the list: - config.xml - deployment plans We are currently working on documenting the schemas for v1.1, well just starting ;-) It would be great if we can get your feedback on these articles. http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/geronimo-application-11xsd.html Cheers! Hernan raxpl wrote: a hyperlinked listing of config. xml tags (properties) and the possible values and what they achieve...for things like geronimo-web.xml (ideally kept up to date as a core bit of documentation) - well this is asking for a lot but i work a lot on Adobe Flex and i got that out of the box (but it's expensive so they can afford documentation teams) But that's the big challenge when you've got all the simple tutorial apps etc. working...how do i get to grips with rest of the behemoth ! Hernan Cunico wrote: Hi All, I would like to initiate a thread for discussing the topics to cover in the Geronimo v1.2 documentation. The idea is to build a prioritized list and then derive it into a TOC. What would you guys like to see in the Geronimo v1.2 doc? Cheers! Hernan
Geronimo v1.2 documentation
Hi All, I would like to initiate a thread for discussing the topics to cover in the Geronimo v1.2 documentation. The idea is to build a prioritized list and then derive it into a TOC. What would you guys like to see in the Geronimo v1.2 doc? Cheers! Hernan
