enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests failure (Re: Latest trunk builds are not the "latest".)

2009-05-12 Thread David Blevins 
Been looking into this one and it appears that my first guess wasn't  
right.  Seems to actually be some issue with the ejb linking code.   
For some reason the app client is trying to lookup a local view from  
the server.


Investigating.

-David


On May 11, 2009, at 11:00 PM, David Blevins wrote:

Hmmm.  I seem to recall mid April being the time that we realized we  
weren't getting updated openejb snapshots due to the nexus switch.   
I suspect it might some left over "must updated the clients to use  
the right JNDI name" due to the fix that Manu made a few months back  
that made it so the jndi name elements in the openejb-jar.xml worked  
again.



-David


On May 11, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:


Yep. The 'latest' link is updated when all testsuite test pass.

You can browse the results at:
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/
(under logs-- directories).

For example for enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests see
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/logs-2100-tomcat/enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests/sec-ear/target/surefire-reports/org.apache.geronimo.mavenplugins.geronimo.server.RunClientMojo.txt

Jarek

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:07 PM, David Jencks > wrote:
I strongly suspect that the testsuite has been failing since 15  
april, thus

preventing copying to the "latest" location.
Personally I get more and different testsuite failures locally on  
my mac,
but I haven't looked very hard into why.  Can anyone supply info  
on the test

failure that is occurring in the automated builds?
thanks
david jencks
On May 11, 2009, at 6:31 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:

The trunk binary here was built on 15-Apr-2009 according to
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/latest/

While the latest binary
here http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/ 
  indicates

the latest build should be 12-May-2009
Is there any problem with the build system ?
--
Shawn

Re: Latest trunk builds are not the "latest".

2009-05-11 Thread David Blevins 
Hmmm.  I seem to recall mid April being the time that we realized we  
weren't getting updated openejb snapshots due to the nexus switch.  I  
suspect it might some left over "must updated the clients to use the  
right JNDI name" due to the fix that Manu made a few months back that  
made it so the jndi name elements in the openejb-jar.xml worked again.



-David


On May 11, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:


Yep. The 'latest' link is updated when all testsuite test pass.

You can browse the results at:
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/
(under logs-- directories).

For example for enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests see
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/logs-2100-tomcat/enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests/sec-ear/target/surefire-reports/org.apache.geronimo.mavenplugins.geronimo.server.RunClientMojo.txt

Jarek

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:07 PM, David Jencks  
 wrote:
I strongly suspect that the testsuite has been failing since 15  
april, thus

preventing copying to the "latest" location.
Personally I get more and different testsuite failures locally on  
my mac,
but I haven't looked very hard into why.  Can anyone supply info on  
the test

failure that is occurring in the automated builds?
thanks
david jencks
On May 11, 2009, at 6:31 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:

The trunk binary here was built on 15-Apr-2009 according to
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/ 
latest/


While the latest binary
here http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/ 
  indicates

the latest build should be 12-May-2009
Is there any problem with the build system ?
--
Shawn

Re: Latest trunk builds are not the "latest".

2009-05-11 Thread Jarek Gawor 
Yep. The 'latest' link is updated when all testsuite test pass.

You can browse the results at:
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/
(under logs-- directories).

For example for enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests see
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/logs-2100-tomcat/enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests/sec-ear/target/surefire-reports/org.apache.geronimo.mavenplugins.geronimo.server.RunClientMojo.txt

Jarek

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:07 PM, David Jencks  wrote:
> I strongly suspect that the testsuite has been failing since 15 april, thus
> preventing copying to the "latest" location.
> Personally I get more and different testsuite failures locally on my mac,
> but I haven't looked very hard into why.  Can anyone supply info on the test
> failure that is occurring in the automated builds?
> thanks
> david jencks
> On May 11, 2009, at 6:31 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
>
> The trunk binary here was built on 15-Apr-2009 according to
> http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/latest/
>
> While the latest binary
> here http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/  indicates
> the latest build should be 12-May-2009
> Is there any problem with the build system ?
> --
> Shawn
>
>

Re: Latest trunk builds are not the "latest".

2009-05-11 Thread David Jencks 
I strongly suspect that the testsuite has been failing since 15 april,  
thus preventing copying to the "latest" location.


Personally I get more and different testsuite failures locally on my  
mac, but I haven't looked very hard into why.  Can anyone supply info  
on the test failure that is occurring in the automated builds?


thanks
david jencks

On May 11, 2009, at 6:31 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:


The trunk binary here was built on 15-Apr-2009  according to 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/latest/


While the latest binary here http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/ 
  indicates the latest build should be 12-May-2009


Is there any problem with the build system ?
--
Shawn

Latest trunk builds are not the "latest".

2009-05-11 Thread Shawn Jiang 
The trunk binary here was built on 15-Apr-2009 according to
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/latest/


While
the latest binary here
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/
 indicates
the latest build should be 12-May-2009

Is there any problem with the build system ?
-- 
Shawn