Re: New and Different Connector Error
On Oct 2, 2004, at 6:22 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: Okay, I put in a Jira issue, checked in the fix, and resolved the Jira issue. Is that the correct procedure? Yep. Make sure you mark the issue as Affects M2 since this bug was in the previous release, and fixed in M3 since it will be in the next release. These version numbers drive our change log generation system. When should the Jira issue be closed, and by whom? Normally it is closed by whomever decides it is really fixed. -dain
Re: New and Different Connector Error
On Sun, 3 Oct 2004, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Oct 2, 2004, at 6:22 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: Yep. Make sure you mark the issue as Affects M2 since this bug was in the previous release, and fixed in M3 since it will be in the next release. These version numbers drive our change log generation system. Oops, I set it as M3 for both. Do I need to reopen it to change the Affects Version back to M2? Aaron
Re: New and Different Connector Error
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 09:22:25PM -0400, Aaron Mulder wrote: Okay, I put in a Jira issue, checked in the fix, and resolved the Jira issue. Hi Aaron, I'm confident that GERONIMO-265 is caused by the same problem as GERONIMO-349 so you (or David Jencks) can close that one, too. Thanks for the fix! Toby http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-265
Re: New and Different Connector Error
On Oct 3, 2004, at 9:20 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote: On Sun, 3 Oct 2004, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Oct 2, 2004, at 6:22 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: Yep. Make sure you mark the issue as Affects M2 since this bug was in the previous release, and fixed in M3 since it will be in the next release. These version numbers drive our change log generation system. Oops, I set it as M3 for both. Do I need to reopen it to change the Affects Version back to M2? Yes. It is super annoying but it is the only way. -dain