Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7
isn't that still less than 24 hours? :) On Dec 7, 2005, at 1:04 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: One more time. Based on wildly popular feedback. Here is an alternate branching proposal. [ ] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 [ ] -1 Defer branching provide proposed alternative Matt -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7
Matt Hogstrom wrote: One more time. Based on wildly popular feedback. Here is an alternate branching proposal. [ ] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 [ ] -1 Defer branching provide proposed alternative +1 - on the basis that it is a branch and not a tag.
Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7
+1On 12/7/05, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: One more time. Based on wildly popular feedback. Here is an alternatebranching proposal.[ ] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7[ ] -1 Defer branching provide proposed alternativeMatt
Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7
+1 On 12/7/05, Sachin Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [X] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 > > On 12/7/05 1:04 AM, "Matt Hogstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > One more time. Based on wildly popular feedback. Here is an alternate > > branching proposal. > > > > [ ] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 > > [ ] -1 Defer branching provide proposed alternative > > > > Matt > > > > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7
[X] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 On 12/7/05 1:04 AM, "Matt Hogstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One more time. Based on wildly popular feedback. Here is an alternate > branching proposal. > > [ ] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 > [ ] -1 Defer branching provide proposed alternative > > Matt >
Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7
On 12/6/05, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One more time. Based on wildly popular feedback. Here is an alternate
> branching proposal.
+1
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61Ehttp://www.castor.org/
Apache Geronimo
http://geronimo.apache.org/
Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7
+1 Gianny Matt Hogstrom wrote: One more time. Based on wildly popular feedback. Here is an alternate branching proposal. [ ] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 [ ] -1 Defer branching provide proposed alternative Matt
Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7
Matt Hogstrom wrote: [X] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 [ ] -1 Defer branching provide proposed alternative Jacek
Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7
+1 david jencks On Dec 6, 2005, at 10:04 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: One more time. Based on wildly popular feedback. Here is an alternate branching proposal. [ ] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 [ ] -1 Defer branching provide proposed alternative Matt
Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7
+1 On 12/7/05, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 :D > > Matt Hogstrom wrote: > > One more time. Based on wildly popular feedback. Here is an alternate > > branching proposal. > > > > [ ] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 > > [ ] -1 Defer branching provide proposed alternative > > > > Matt >
Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7
+1 :D Matt Hogstrom wrote: One more time. Based on wildly popular feedback. Here is an alternate branching proposal. [ ] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 [ ] -1 Defer branching provide proposed alternative Matt
Re: [Vote] Alternate Proposal for Branch V1.0 for Geronimo at 23:59 PST 12/7
+1 janb Matt Hogstrom wrote: > One more time. Based on wildly popular feedback. Here is an alternate > branching proposal. > > [ ] +1 Branch V1.0 at 23:59 PST 12/7 > [ ] -1 Defer branching provide proposed alternative > > Matt > >
