Re: Java EE schema license question

2006-10-30 Thread Dan Diephouse
CC'ing cxf-dev and apache legal, as it pertains to Geronimo, but I think 
it would be good for us (CXF) to hear from legal  The part of the 
license that concerns me is this:


No part of this document may be reproduced in any form by any means 
without prior written authorization of Sun and its licensors, if any.


Does G have prior written authorization to include it as part of the 
source distro? Does Apache as a whole? Can we as an incubating project 
redistribute this in our source distribution? If not can we do so 
temporarily until we're able to obtain authorization?


- Dan

Bozhong Lin wrote:

re-sending with Java EE schema URL links included:

[1] http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/javaee_5.xsd
[2] http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/j2ee_1_4.xsd

 Original Message 
Subject: Java EE schema license question
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:31:05 +0800
From: Bozhong Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org

Hi,

Apache CXF currently use java EE 5 [1] schema, and would like to include
the schema in distribution if that is allowed from copyright
perspective. From the copyright statement included in the schema file,
it seems to be very strict for redistribution. I found that Geronimo
source distribution includes java EE 1.4 schema [2], which has similar
copyright statement. I just wonder if this ever was a legal issue for
you guys, and how you guys get around of this if so?

Thanks for the insight!

Cheers,
Bo




--
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com
http://netzooid.com/blog



Re: Java EE schema license question

2006-10-30 Thread Guillaume Nodet

Schemas has been removed from the latest Geronimo distributions.
They are only used at build time to generate xmlbeans classes to
parse the deployment descriptors and are no longer distributed afaik.

On 10/30/06, Dan Diephouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

CC'ing cxf-dev and apache legal, as it pertains to Geronimo, but I think
it would be good for us (CXF) to hear from legal  The part of the
license that concerns me is this:

No part of this document may be reproduced in any form by any means
without prior written authorization of Sun and its licensors, if any.

Does G have prior written authorization to include it as part of the
source distro? Does Apache as a whole? Can we as an incubating project
redistribute this in our source distribution? If not can we do so
temporarily until we're able to obtain authorization?

- Dan

Bozhong Lin wrote:
 re-sending with Java EE schema URL links included:

 [1] http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/javaee_5.xsd
 [2] http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/j2ee_1_4.xsd

  Original Message 
 Subject: Java EE schema license question
 Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:31:05 +0800
 From: Bozhong Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org

 Hi,

 Apache CXF currently use java EE 5 [1] schema, and would like to include
 the schema in distribution if that is allowed from copyright
 perspective. From the copyright statement included in the schema file,
 it seems to be very strict for redistribution. I found that Geronimo
 source distribution includes java EE 1.4 schema [2], which has similar
 copyright statement. I just wonder if this ever was a legal issue for
 you guys, and how you guys get around of this if so?

 Thanks for the insight!

 Cheers,
 Bo



--
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com
http://netzooid.com/blog





--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet


RE: Java EE schema license question

2006-10-30 Thread Hurley, Oisin
 
No part of this document may be reproduced in any form by any 
means without prior written authorization of Sun and its 
licensors, if any.

In Eclipse-land, when these files are needed by the WTP framework,
it actually pops up a dialog box with the license and you have to 
click yes to carry on. My assumption is that this little piece
of text is the issue, so I would be interested to hear any of 
the (qualified :) opinions that come up here.

 cheers
  --oh


Re: Java EE schema license question

2006-10-30 Thread Matt Hogstrom
For Geronimo (apart from initial setup) it is most often run in a  
background environment through scripts so there isn't a person their  
to accept the license.  We could probably create some kind of  
acceptance file that a user would have to manually update but that's  
kind of clunky.


On Oct 30, 2006, at 10:21 AM, Hurley, Oisin wrote:




No part of this document may be reproduced in any form by any
means without prior written authorization of Sun and its
licensors, if any.


In Eclipse-land, when these files are needed by the WTP framework,
it actually pops up a dialog box with the license and you have to
click yes to carry on. My assumption is that this little piece
of text is the issue, so I would be interested to hear any of
the (qualified :) opinions that come up here.

 cheers
  --oh



Matt Hogstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: Java EE schema license question

2006-10-30 Thread David Jencks
We recently noticed this problem also and have removed all the sun  
schemas from our distributions and active svn branches.  Earlier  
releases (up through 1.1) included the j2ee 1.4 schemas, and we  
haven't made any attempt to stop distributing them or modify the svn  
tags for the releases to remove  the sun schemas.


What we've done is to put the sun schemas in the non-public tck repo  
and generate xmlbeans artifacts from them.  We distribute the  
xmlbeans source  and compiled classes, while removing the actual  
schemas themselves.


This does seem slightly silly since sun does not require a click- 
through license to access them  from the web: we could also have  
generated the xmlbeans artifacts by downloading the schemas at build  
time.  I decided against this approach because it would prevent  
offline builds and because sun has sometimes changed the schemas  
without changing any versioning info and I'd prefer to know what it  
is we are building from.


IIUC Geir would be the one to negotiate a license and since IIRC he  
pointed out the problem  to us I assume he regards it as extremely  
unlikely that we can get a license to redistribute the files.


thanks
david jencks

On Oct 30, 2006, at 6:46 AM, Dan Diephouse wrote:

CC'ing cxf-dev and apache legal, as it pertains to Geronimo, but I  
think it would be good for us (CXF) to hear from legal  The part of  
the license that concerns me is this:


No part of this document may be reproduced in any form by any means  
without prior written authorization of Sun and its licensors, if any.


Does G have prior written authorization to include it as part of  
the source distro? Does Apache as a whole? Can we as an incubating  
project redistribute this in our source distribution? If not can we  
do so temporarily until we're able to obtain authorization?


- Dan

Bozhong Lin wrote:

re-sending with Java EE schema URL links included:

[1] http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/javaee_5.xsd
[2] http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/j2ee_1_4.xsd

 Original Message 
Subject: Java EE schema license question
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:31:05 +0800
From: Bozhong Lin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org

Hi,

Apache CXF currently use java EE 5 [1] schema, and would like to  
include

the schema in distribution if that is allowed from copyright
perspective. From the copyright statement included in the schema  
file,

it seems to be very strict for redistribution. I found that Geronimo
source distribution includes java EE 1.4 schema [2], which has  
similar

copyright statement. I just wonder if this ever was a legal issue for
you guys, and how you guys get around of this if so?

Thanks for the insight!

Cheers,
Bo




--
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com
http://netzooid.com/blog


-
DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
and policies of the ASF.  See http://www.apache.org/licenses/ for
official ASF policies and documents.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]