Re: OpenEJB 3 integration working
Great news!! Vamsi On 1/19/07, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It has been a long week, but David and I got the integration working tonight. We successful got the OpenEJB 3 itest application to deploy and got the client to fire up and call the server. A bunch of tests fail due to a bug in lookup of datasources in OpenEJB, but we got a good number of passes. -dain
Re: OpenEJB 3 integration working
I just tested deploying an ear containing the OpenEJB itests and it works as well as the standalone ejb-jar itests. Here is the geronimo-application.xml I used: http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/ application-1.1" xmlns:j2ee="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee";> itests itests 1 car commons-lang commons-lang 2.0 junit junit 3.8.1 org.apache.geronimo.configs system-database car openejb-itests-beans-3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/j2ee/ejb/openejb-2.0"; xmlns:n="http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/naming-1.2"; > database org.apache.geronimo.configs system-database SystemDatasource datasource org.apache.geronimo.configs system-database SystemDatasource jdbc/basic/entityDatabase org.apache.geronimo.configs system-database SystemDatasource stateless/references/Resource_manager_accessn:ref-name> org.apache.geronimo.configs system-database SystemDatasource persistence/TestContextn:persistence-context-ref-name> openjpa-test-unitunit-name> Transactionalcontext-type> persistence/ ExtendedTestContext openjpa-test-unitunit-name> Extendedtype> openejb/cmpcontext-ref-name> cmp Transactionalcontext-type> persistence/TestUnitn:persistence-unit-ref-name> openjpa-test-unitunit-name> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence"; version="1.0"> org.apache.openjpa.persistence.PersistenceProviderImplprovider> ?name=SystemDatasource ?name=NoTxDatasourcesource> META-INF/jpa.mapping.xml org.apache.openejb.test.entity.cmp.BasicCmpBeanclass> false org.apache.openjpa.persistence.PersistenceProviderImplprovider> ?name=SystemDatasource ?name=NoTxDatasourcesource> org.apache.openejb.test.entity.Customer
Re: OpenEJB 3 integration working
CMP works as long as you enable the Geronimo javaagent for runtime enhancement with the following on the command line -javaagent:target/jetty-jee5/bin/jpa.jar This is required since OpenEJB generates the cmp implementation classes so they can not be preenhanced. The other obvious problem I see is "Extended" persistence contexts for stateful session beans are not working, but that is not a big concern, since they are rarely used. That can be left as a known issue for M2. -dain On Jan 19, 2007, at 9:13 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Fixed the refs and now most stuff seems to be working except for cmp. -dain On Jan 19, 2007, at 4:21 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Datasource references work but other important ones like UserTransaction and persistence context don't. I'm working on those now. -dain On Jan 19, 2007, at 1:20 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: It has been a long week, but David and I got the integration working tonight. We successful got the OpenEJB 3 itest application to deploy and got the client to fire up and call the server. A bunch of tests fail due to a bug in lookup of datasources in OpenEJB, but we got a good number of passes. -dain
Re: OpenEJB 3 integration working
Fixed the refs and now most stuff seems to be working except for cmp. -dain On Jan 19, 2007, at 4:21 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Datasource references work but other important ones like UserTransaction and persistence context don't. I'm working on those now. -dain On Jan 19, 2007, at 1:20 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: It has been a long week, but David and I got the integration working tonight. We successful got the OpenEJB 3 itest application to deploy and got the client to fire up and call the server. A bunch of tests fail due to a bug in lookup of datasources in OpenEJB, but we got a good number of passes. -dain
Re: OpenEJB 3 integration working
Datasource references work but other important ones like UserTransaction and persistence context don't. I'm working on those now. -dain On Jan 19, 2007, at 1:20 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: It has been a long week, but David and I got the integration working tonight. We successful got the OpenEJB 3 itest application to deploy and got the client to fire up and call the server. A bunch of tests fail due to a bug in lookup of datasources in OpenEJB, but we got a good number of passes. -dain
Re: OpenEJB 3 integration working
This is great news! Congratulations!! david jencks On Jan 19, 2007, at 1:20 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: It has been a long week, but David and I got the integration working tonight. We successful got the OpenEJB 3 itest application to deploy and got the client to fire up and call the server. A bunch of tests fail due to a bug in lookup of datasources in OpenEJB, but we got a good number of passes. -dain
Re: OpenEJB 3 integration working
Wonderful Thanks Dain and David for all the hard work. Anita --- Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It has been a long week, but David and I got the integration working > > tonight. We successful got the OpenEJB 3 itest application to deploy > > and got the client to fire up and call the server. A bunch of tests > > fail due to a bug in lookup of datasources in OpenEJB, but we got a > good number of passes. > > -dain > Never Miss an Email Stay connected with Yahoo! Mail on your mobile. Get started! http://mobile.yahoo.com/services?promote=mail
Re: OpenEJB 3 integration working
Wow !!! You guyz are terrific ! Cheers Prasad On 1/19/07, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It has been a long week, but David and I got the integration working tonight. We successful got the OpenEJB 3 itest application to deploy and got the client to fire up and call the server. A bunch of tests fail due to a bug in lookup of datasources in OpenEJB, but we got a good number of passes. -dain
Re: OpenEJB 3 integration working
Sweet! great job Dain and David. Paul On 1/19/07, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It has been a long week, but David and I got the integration working tonight. We successful got the OpenEJB 3 itest application to deploy and got the client to fire up and call the server. A bunch of tests fail due to a bug in lookup of datasources in OpenEJB, but we got a good number of passes. -dain
Re: OpenEJB 3 integration working
On Jan 19, 2007, at 4:20 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: It has been a long week, but David and I got the integration working tonight. We successful got the OpenEJB 3 itest application to deploy and got the client to fire up and call the server. (yawn) A bunch of tests fail due to a bug in lookup of datasources in OpenEJB, but we got a good number of passes. Ok, all kidding aside this is awesome. I'm building this morning. Hats off dudes. -dain Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OpenEJB 3 integration working
This is great news that will really make 2.0-M2 shine! Thanks for all the hard work, long hours, and dedication that it took to make this happen. Joe Dain Sundstrom wrote: It has been a long week, but David and I got the integration working tonight. We successful got the OpenEJB 3 itest application to deploy and got the client to fire up and call the server. A bunch of tests fail due to a bug in lookup of datasources in OpenEJB, but we got a good number of passes. -dain
Re: OpenEJB 3 integration working
Wow, this is awesome! Great Job!! On Jan 19, 2007, at 4:20 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: It has been a long week, but David and I got the integration working tonight. We successful got the OpenEJB 3 itest application to deploy and got the client to fire up and call the server. A bunch of tests fail due to a bug in lookup of datasources in OpenEJB, but we got a good number of passes. -dain -sachin
Re: OpenEJB 3 integration working
On 1/19/07, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It has been a long week, but David and I got the integration working tonight. We successful got the OpenEJB 3 itest application to deploy and got the client to fire up and call the server. A bunch of tests fail due to a bug in lookup of datasources in OpenEJB, but we got a good number of passes. Awesome! Although it might've seemed hard to crack, THEY again did it! Thanks! Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
