Re: long-term buildability of released versions?

2008-02-08 Thread toby cabot

> If you still have problems, please keep this thread alive

At the risk of demonstrating my inability to follow directions I'll
keep the thread alive to say that with your changes and Jarek's I
think we're in good shape.  Thanks!


Re: long-term buildability of released versions?

2008-02-07 Thread Donald Woods
I just built the latest 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT code (r619588) online and then 
again offline successfully via -

   mvn install -Dtest=false -o
If you still have problems, please keep this thread alive


-Donald


toby cabot wrote:

Hi Folks,

I'm trying to gather the set of code and dependencies to build
Geronimo 2.0.2.  I'd like to end up with all of the bits that I need
to build 2.0.2 without accessing the internet next week, next month,
etc, and end up with the same image.

Donald and Iain on the user list helped me with the config-magic to
convince Maven to stay local, so now I've got a maven repo with *only*
the deps that 2.0.2 needs to build.  If I do an online build
everything works great, Maven copies the deps from that tree to my
user repo and the build succeeds.

Here's the problem: if I try to do an offline build the next day I get
an error about a missing jar and the build fails.


Missing:
--
1) org.apache.ws.scout:jaxr-api:jar:SNAPSHOT

...
  Path to dependency: 
1) org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-webservices:jar:2.0.2

2) org.apache.ws.scout:scout:jar:1.0rc1
3) org.apache.ws.scout:jaxr-api:jar:SNAPSHOT


Evidently the SNAPSHOT keyword tells Maven "refuse to build until
you've checked whether there's a newer version online".

What's the Geronimo project's goal vis-a-vis repeatably building
Geronimo releases in the future?  As it stands, the 2.0.2 I build
today won't necessarily be the same as the one I build tomorrow since
Maven will aggressively bring new versions of jaxr-api (and maybe
others) into my build environment unless I crowbar Maven to think it's
online when it really isn't.

If bit-for-bit repeatability is a non-goal that's cool, I'll hack on
my internal repo metadata until Maven thinks that it's locked in
place.  If it is I'll try to figure out how to "lock down" the
dependencies so they don't change.

Thanks,
Toby



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: long-term buildability of released versions?

2008-02-06 Thread toby cabot
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 01:23:33PM -0500, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> I've fixed 1) and 2) in trunk, branches/2.0, and branches/2.1.

Thank you.

> I'm not sure about the other two.

I tried surefire 2.3 and it works fine.  I think it's low risk since
it's only used during the build.

--- maven-plugins/geronimo-maven-plugin/pom.xml (revision 615899)
+++ maven-plugins/geronimo-maven-plugin/pom.xml (working copy)
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
 
 org.apache.maven.surefire
 surefire-api
-2.1-SNAPSHOT
+2.3
 
 
 

jtidy looks as if it will be a problem, but we've made very good
progress.


Re: long-term buildability of released versions?

2008-02-05 Thread Donald Woods
There are newer released versions of surefire-api we can use - 2.3, 
2.3.1 and 2.4.  I'll defer to someone who knows our maven-plugins better 
to determine if we can move up to a newer version


The only release of jtidy is 4aug2000r7-dev.  The latest snapshot is 
http://jtidy.sourceforge.net/snapshots/jtidy/jtidy/8.0-SNAPSHOT/jtidy-8.0-20060801.131059-3.jar. 
 I asked to join the project, but we may need to copy that jar into our 
local repo dir as a short-term solution.



-Donald


Jarek Gawor wrote:

I've fixed 1) and 2) in trunk, branches/2.0, and branches/2.1.

For 1) add the exclusion like David mentioned. For 2) just remove the
 element for that api in geronimo-jaxws/pom.xml. It's really
not needed there.

I'm not sure about the other two.

Jarek

On Feb 5, 2008 12:25 PM, toby cabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Thanks David, it sounds as if we do want a SNAPSHOT-less build.

These snapshots croak 2.0.2's offline build:

| 1) org.apache.ws.scout:jaxr-api:jar:SNAPSHOT
|
|   Path to dependency:
| 1) org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-webservices:jar:2.0.2
| 2) org.apache.ws.scout:scout:jar:1.0rc1
| 3) org.apache.ws.scout:jaxr-api:jar:SNAPSHOT
|
| 1) org.apache.axis2:axis2-jaxws-api:jar:SNAPSHOT
|
|   Path to dependency:
| 1) org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-jaxws:jar:2.0.2
| 2) org.apache.axis2:axis2-jaxws-api:jar:SNAPSHOT
|
| 1) org.apache.maven.surefire:surefire-api:jar:2.1-SNAPSHOT
|
|   Path to dependency:
| 1) 
org.apache.geronimo.plugins:geronimo-maven-plugin:maven-plugin:2.0.2
| 2) org.apache.maven.surefire:surefire-api:jar:2.1-SNAPSHOT
|
| 1) jtidy:jtidy:jar:8.0-SNAPSHOT
|
|   Path to dependency:
| 1) 
org.apache.geronimo.plugins:testsuite-maven-plugin:maven-plugin:2.0.2
| 2) jtidy:jtidy:jar:8.0-SNAPSHOT

Not bad.  If you'd like I can try to find the nearest released
versions that correspond to the snapshots and see what happens if I
substitute them.





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: long-term buildability of released versions?

2008-02-05 Thread Jarek Gawor
I've fixed 1) and 2) in trunk, branches/2.0, and branches/2.1.

For 1) add the exclusion like David mentioned. For 2) just remove the
 element for that api in geronimo-jaxws/pom.xml. It's really
not needed there.

I'm not sure about the other two.

Jarek

On Feb 5, 2008 12:25 PM, toby cabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks David, it sounds as if we do want a SNAPSHOT-less build.
>
> These snapshots croak 2.0.2's offline build:
>
> | 1) org.apache.ws.scout:jaxr-api:jar:SNAPSHOT
> |
> |   Path to dependency:
> | 1) org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-webservices:jar:2.0.2
> | 2) org.apache.ws.scout:scout:jar:1.0rc1
> | 3) org.apache.ws.scout:jaxr-api:jar:SNAPSHOT
> |
> | 1) org.apache.axis2:axis2-jaxws-api:jar:SNAPSHOT
> |
> |   Path to dependency:
> | 1) org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-jaxws:jar:2.0.2
> | 2) org.apache.axis2:axis2-jaxws-api:jar:SNAPSHOT
> |
> | 1) org.apache.maven.surefire:surefire-api:jar:2.1-SNAPSHOT
> |
> |   Path to dependency:
> | 1) 
> org.apache.geronimo.plugins:geronimo-maven-plugin:maven-plugin:2.0.2
> | 2) org.apache.maven.surefire:surefire-api:jar:2.1-SNAPSHOT
> |
> | 1) jtidy:jtidy:jar:8.0-SNAPSHOT
> |
> |   Path to dependency:
> | 1) 
> org.apache.geronimo.plugins:testsuite-maven-plugin:maven-plugin:2.0.2
> | 2) jtidy:jtidy:jar:8.0-SNAPSHOT
>
> Not bad.  If you'd like I can try to find the nearest released
> versions that correspond to the snapshots and see what happens if I
> substitute them.
>


Re: long-term buildability of released versions?

2008-02-05 Thread toby cabot
Thanks David, it sounds as if we do want a SNAPSHOT-less build.

These snapshots croak 2.0.2's offline build:

| 1) org.apache.ws.scout:jaxr-api:jar:SNAPSHOT
| 
|   Path to dependency: 
| 1) org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-webservices:jar:2.0.2
| 2) org.apache.ws.scout:scout:jar:1.0rc1
| 3) org.apache.ws.scout:jaxr-api:jar:SNAPSHOT
| 
| 1) org.apache.axis2:axis2-jaxws-api:jar:SNAPSHOT
| 
|   Path to dependency: 
| 1) org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-jaxws:jar:2.0.2
| 2) org.apache.axis2:axis2-jaxws-api:jar:SNAPSHOT
| 
| 1) org.apache.maven.surefire:surefire-api:jar:2.1-SNAPSHOT
| 
|   Path to dependency: 
| 1) 
org.apache.geronimo.plugins:geronimo-maven-plugin:maven-plugin:2.0.2
| 2) org.apache.maven.surefire:surefire-api:jar:2.1-SNAPSHOT
| 
| 1) jtidy:jtidy:jar:8.0-SNAPSHOT
| 
|   Path to dependency: 
| 1) 
org.apache.geronimo.plugins:testsuite-maven-plugin:maven-plugin:2.0.2
| 2) jtidy:jtidy:jar:8.0-SNAPSHOT

Not bad.  If you'd like I can try to find the nearest released
versions that correspond to the snapshots and see what happens if I
substitute them.


Re: long-term buildability of released versions?

2008-02-05 Thread David Jencks

Hopefully a better maven expert than I will chime in.

I think we are using the scout jar but not the jaxr-api snapshot  
jar.  I'm pretty sure the scout 1.0rc1 jar should not have been  
released since it depends on a snapshot.  In this case I think that  
the solution is to exclude the scout jaxr-api jar in the scout  
dependency.


The much bigger question is how we detect these problems before  
cutting a release.  One step would be to use the release plugin since  
IIUC it will scan for snapshot dependencies and refuse to proceed: I  
don't know if this is only for what you are building or if it checks  
all the way down the dependency tree.


Anyone have ideas on what else we can do?

thanks
david jencks

On Feb 5, 2008, at 7:50 AM, toby cabot wrote:


Hi Folks,

I'm trying to gather the set of code and dependencies to build
Geronimo 2.0.2.  I'd like to end up with all of the bits that I need
to build 2.0.2 without accessing the internet next week, next month,
etc, and end up with the same image.

Donald and Iain on the user list helped me with the config-magic to
convince Maven to stay local, so now I've got a maven repo with *only*
the deps that 2.0.2 needs to build.  If I do an online build
everything works great, Maven copies the deps from that tree to my
user repo and the build succeeds.

Here's the problem: if I try to do an offline build the next day I get
an error about a missing jar and the build fails.


Missing:
--
1) org.apache.ws.scout:jaxr-api:jar:SNAPSHOT

...

  Path to dependency:
1) org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-webservices:jar:2.0.2
2) org.apache.ws.scout:scout:jar:1.0rc1
3) org.apache.ws.scout:jaxr-api:jar:SNAPSHOT


Evidently the SNAPSHOT keyword tells Maven "refuse to build until
you've checked whether there's a newer version online".

What's the Geronimo project's goal vis-a-vis repeatably building
Geronimo releases in the future?  As it stands, the 2.0.2 I build
today won't necessarily be the same as the one I build tomorrow since
Maven will aggressively bring new versions of jaxr-api (and maybe
others) into my build environment unless I crowbar Maven to think it's
online when it really isn't.

If bit-for-bit repeatability is a non-goal that's cool, I'll hack on
my internal repo metadata until Maven thinks that it's locked in
place.  If it is I'll try to figure out how to "lock down" the
dependencies so they don't change.

Thanks,
Toby