Re: What is the expected format of explicit-versions.properties?
On Nov 21, 2006, at 4:58 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: I'm not sure if this is right... but we are generating entries like: snip scout/scout//jar=scout/scout/0.5/jar /snip Is that correct? Or should it be: snip scout/scout//jar=0.5 /snip what is there is correct. This lets you substitute artifacts, as is done in the sandbox/javaee5 stuff where the jta11 tx config is substituted for the jta 1.0.1B one in the regular server. thanks david jencks --jason
Re: What is the expected format of explicit-versions.properties?
k, just checking. --jason On Nov 22, 2006, at 12:12 AM, David Jencks wrote: On Nov 21, 2006, at 4:58 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: I'm not sure if this is right... but we are generating entries like: snip scout/scout//jar=scout/scout/0.5/jar /snip Is that correct? Or should it be: snip scout/scout//jar=0.5 /snip what is there is correct. This lets you substitute artifacts, as is done in the sandbox/javaee5 stuff where the jta11 tx config is substituted for the jta 1.0.1B one in the regular server. thanks david jencks --jason
