mx4j dependencies

2007-02-28 Thread Sachin Patel

The following still have dependencies to mx4j..

applications/console/geronimo-console-core/pom.xml
configs/client-system/pom.xml
configs/j2ee-system/pom.xml
configs/jsr88-cli/pom.xml
configs/jsr88-deploymentfactory/pom.xml
configs/shutdown/pom.xml
maven-plugins/geronimo-maven-plugin/pom.xml
modules/ge-activemq-rar/pom.xml
modules/geronimo-deploy-jsr88/pom.xml
modules/geronimo-jmx-remoting/pom.xml
pom.xml

Can we go ahead and remove these?

-sachin




Re: mx4j dependencies

2007-02-28 Thread Jason Dillon

Does the system blow up in strange ways if you do?

--jason


On Feb 28, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:


The following still have dependencies to mx4j..

applications/console/geronimo-console-core/pom.xml
configs/client-system/pom.xml
configs/j2ee-system/pom.xml
configs/jsr88-cli/pom.xml
configs/jsr88-deploymentfactory/pom.xml
configs/shutdown/pom.xml
maven-plugins/geronimo-maven-plugin/pom.xml
modules/ge-activemq-rar/pom.xml
modules/geronimo-deploy-jsr88/pom.xml
modules/geronimo-jmx-remoting/pom.xml
pom.xml

Can we go ahead and remove these?

-sachin






Re: mx4j dependencies

2007-02-28 Thread Sachin Patel
Trying now, I know I removed my dependencies on mx4j on devtools and  
rely on the jmx stuff in the vm and it works perfectly.


-sachin


On Feb 28, 2007, at 4:16 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:


Does the system blow up in strange ways if you do?

--jason


On Feb 28, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:


The following still have dependencies to mx4j..

applications/console/geronimo-console-core/pom.xml
configs/client-system/pom.xml
configs/j2ee-system/pom.xml
configs/jsr88-cli/pom.xml
configs/jsr88-deploymentfactory/pom.xml
configs/shutdown/pom.xml
maven-plugins/geronimo-maven-plugin/pom.xml
modules/ge-activemq-rar/pom.xml
modules/geronimo-deploy-jsr88/pom.xml
modules/geronimo-jmx-remoting/pom.xml
pom.xml

Can we go ahead and remove these?

-sachin








Re: mx4j dependencies

2007-02-28 Thread Jason Dillon

What about remote deploy?

--jason


On Feb 28, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:

Trying now, I know I removed my dependencies on mx4j on devtools  
and rely on the jmx stuff in the vm and it works perfectly.


-sachin


On Feb 28, 2007, at 4:16 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:


Does the system blow up in strange ways if you do?

--jason


On Feb 28, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:


The following still have dependencies to mx4j..

applications/console/geronimo-console-core/pom.xml
configs/client-system/pom.xml
configs/j2ee-system/pom.xml
configs/jsr88-cli/pom.xml
configs/jsr88-deploymentfactory/pom.xml
configs/shutdown/pom.xml
maven-plugins/geronimo-maven-plugin/pom.xml
modules/ge-activemq-rar/pom.xml
modules/geronimo-deploy-jsr88/pom.xml
modules/geronimo-jmx-remoting/pom.xml
pom.xml

Can we go ahead and remove these?

-sachin










Re: mx4j dependencies

2007-02-28 Thread Jason Dillon
If this works, then we should check for any mx4j bits in the codebase  
(like the logging init) and make sure to pull that out too.


--jason


On Feb 28, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:

Trying now, I know I removed my dependencies on mx4j on devtools  
and rely on the jmx stuff in the vm and it works perfectly.


-sachin


On Feb 28, 2007, at 4:16 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:


Does the system blow up in strange ways if you do?

--jason


On Feb 28, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:


The following still have dependencies to mx4j..

applications/console/geronimo-console-core/pom.xml
configs/client-system/pom.xml
configs/j2ee-system/pom.xml
configs/jsr88-cli/pom.xml
configs/jsr88-deploymentfactory/pom.xml
configs/shutdown/pom.xml
maven-plugins/geronimo-maven-plugin/pom.xml
modules/ge-activemq-rar/pom.xml
modules/geronimo-deploy-jsr88/pom.xml
modules/geronimo-jmx-remoting/pom.xml
pom.xml

Can we go ahead and remove these?

-sachin










Re: mx4j dependencies

2007-02-28 Thread Sachin Patel
should work, as i think i remember it working from the eclipse plugin  
also, but will verify.


-sachin


On Feb 28, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:


What about remote deploy?

--jason


On Feb 28, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:

Trying now, I know I removed my dependencies on mx4j on devtools  
and rely on the jmx stuff in the vm and it works perfectly.


-sachin


On Feb 28, 2007, at 4:16 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:


Does the system blow up in strange ways if you do?

--jason


On Feb 28, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:


The following still have dependencies to mx4j..

applications/console/geronimo-console-core/pom.xml
configs/client-system/pom.xml
configs/j2ee-system/pom.xml
configs/jsr88-cli/pom.xml
configs/jsr88-deploymentfactory/pom.xml
configs/shutdown/pom.xml
maven-plugins/geronimo-maven-plugin/pom.xml
modules/ge-activemq-rar/pom.xml
modules/geronimo-deploy-jsr88/pom.xml
modules/geronimo-jmx-remoting/pom.xml
pom.xml

Can we go ahead and remove these?

-sachin












Re: mx4j dependencies

2007-03-01 Thread Jason Dillon
I think we are free from mx4j deps now... only 2 references of 'mx4j'  
in the project now:


 * modules/ge-activemq-rar/pom.xml (dependency excludes)
 * modules/geronimo-jetty6/src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/jetty6/ 
ClassLoaderTest.java (attempts to use "mx4j.MBeanDescription" to test  
classloading stuff)


Not sure what to do about the later... or even if anything needs to  
be done.


I've removed all other references, including the LICENSE.txt/ 
NOTICE.txt bits.  I didn't find any \*mx4j\* files in the jetty  
assembly, so unless mx4j is hiding in a jar/car/whatever I think it  
should be gone now.


--jason


On Feb 28, 2007, at 1:30 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:

should work, as i think i remember it working from the eclipse  
plugin also, but will verify.


-sachin


On Feb 28, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:


What about remote deploy?

--jason


On Feb 28, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:

Trying now, I know I removed my dependencies on mx4j on devtools  
and rely on the jmx stuff in the vm and it works perfectly.


-sachin


On Feb 28, 2007, at 4:16 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:


Does the system blow up in strange ways if you do?

--jason


On Feb 28, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:


The following still have dependencies to mx4j..

applications/console/geronimo-console-core/pom.xml
configs/client-system/pom.xml
configs/j2ee-system/pom.xml
configs/jsr88-cli/pom.xml
configs/jsr88-deploymentfactory/pom.xml
configs/shutdown/pom.xml
maven-plugins/geronimo-maven-plugin/pom.xml
modules/ge-activemq-rar/pom.xml
modules/geronimo-deploy-jsr88/pom.xml
modules/geronimo-jmx-remoting/pom.xml
pom.xml

Can we go ahead and remove these?

-sachin














Re: mx4j dependencies

2007-03-01 Thread Dain Sundstrom

On Mar 1, 2007, at 1:32 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

 * modules/geronimo-jetty6/src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/jetty6/ 
ClassLoaderTest.java (attempts to use "mx4j.MBeanDescription" to  
test classloading stuff)


Not sure what to do about the later... or even if anything needs to  
be done.


I'd just say remove the test.

-dain


Re: mx4j dependencies

2007-03-02 Thread Jason Dillon

On Mar 1, 2007, at 4:04 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
 * modules/geronimo-jetty6/src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/ 
jetty6/ClassLoaderTest.java (attempts to use  
"mx4j.MBeanDescription" to test classloading stuff)


Not sure what to do about the later... or even if anything needs  
to be done.


I'd just say remove the test.


This test doesn't actually fail with the mx4j deps removed from the  
project.  So either is picking up mx4j somewhere (that isn't getting  
included in the assembly, cause I can't find it there... though  
didn't look too hard for it), or the test is disabled, or its not  
testing anything useful... or its a broken test... or i've been  
sucked into a biiaaar universe.


--jason




Re: mx4j dependencies

2007-03-02 Thread Anita Kulshreshtha
  The tests have been disabled (the names starts with xtest)...

Thanks
Anita

--- Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Mar 1, 2007, at 4:04 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> >>  * modules/geronimo-jetty6/src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/ 
> >> jetty6/ClassLoaderTest.java (attempts to use  
> >> "mx4j.MBeanDescription" to test classloading stuff)
> >>
> >> Not sure what to do about the later... or even if anything needs  
> >> to be done.
> >
> > I'd just say remove the test.
> 
> This test doesn't actually fail with the mx4j deps removed from the  
> project.  So either is picking up mx4j somewhere (that isn't getting 
> 
> included in the assembly, cause I can't find it there... though  
> didn't look too hard for it), or the test is disabled, or its not  
> testing anything useful... or its a broken test... or i've been  
> sucked into a biiaaar universe.
> 
> --jason
> 
> 
> 



 

Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know.
Ask your question on www.Answers.yahoo.com


Re: mx4j dependencies

2007-03-02 Thread Jason Dillon

Ah... I didn't notice that ;-)

Maybe it should be nuked then...

--jason


On Mar 2, 2007, at 4:49 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:


  The tests have been disabled (the names starts with xtest)...

Thanks
Anita

--- Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On Mar 1, 2007, at 4:04 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

 * modules/geronimo-jetty6/src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/
jetty6/ClassLoaderTest.java (attempts to use
"mx4j.MBeanDescription" to test classloading stuff)

Not sure what to do about the later... or even if anything needs
to be done.


I'd just say remove the test.


This test doesn't actually fail with the mx4j deps removed from the
project.  So either is picking up mx4j somewhere (that isn't getting

included in the assembly, cause I can't find it there... though
didn't look too hard for it), or the test is disabled, or its not
testing anything useful... or its a broken test... or i've been
sucked into a biiaaar universe.

--jason








__ 
__

Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know.
Ask your question on www.Answers.yahoo.com




Re: mx4j dependencies

2007-03-02 Thread Anita Kulshreshtha
 Go for it...

Anita

--- Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Ah... I didn't notice that ;-)
> 
> Maybe it should be nuked then...
> 
> --jason
> 
> 
> On Mar 2, 2007, at 4:49 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
> 
> >   The tests have been disabled (the names starts with xtest)...
> >
> > Thanks
> > Anita
> >
> > --- Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mar 1, 2007, at 4:04 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>   * modules/geronimo-jetty6/src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/
>  jetty6/ClassLoaderTest.java (attempts to use
>  "mx4j.MBeanDescription" to test classloading stuff)
> 
>  Not sure what to do about the later... or even if anything needs
>  to be done.
> >>>
> >>> I'd just say remove the test.
> >>
> >> This test doesn't actually fail with the mx4j deps removed from
> the
> >> project.  So either is picking up mx4j somewhere (that isn't
> getting
> >>
> >> included in the assembly, cause I can't find it there... though
> >> didn't look too hard for it), or the test is disabled, or its not
> >> testing anything useful... or its a broken test... or i've been
> >> sucked into a biiaaar universe.
> >>
> >> --jason
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
__
> 
> > __
> > Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know.
> > Ask your question on www.Answers.yahoo.com
> 
> 



 

Bored stiff? Loosen up... 
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
http://games.yahoo.com/games/front


Re: mx4j dependencies

2007-03-03 Thread Jason Dillon
Why not just change these to use org/apache/geronimo/system/main/ 
Daemon, which should be on the parent's classloader?  Or org/apache/ 
log4j/Level ?


Anyways... I don't know enough about what this is really testing to  
just nuke it.  Seems a tad safer to just pick a different class to load.


--jason


On Mar 2, 2007, at 3:53 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:


 Go for it...

Anita

--- Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Ah... I didn't notice that ;-)

Maybe it should be nuked then...

--jason


On Mar 2, 2007, at 4:49 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:


  The tests have been disabled (the names starts with xtest)...

Thanks
Anita

--- Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On Mar 1, 2007, at 4:04 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

 * modules/geronimo-jetty6/src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/
jetty6/ClassLoaderTest.java (attempts to use
"mx4j.MBeanDescription" to test classloading stuff)

Not sure what to do about the later... or even if anything needs
to be done.


I'd just say remove the test.


This test doesn't actually fail with the mx4j deps removed from

the

project.  So either is picking up mx4j somewhere (that isn't

getting


included in the assembly, cause I can't find it there... though
didn't look too hard for it), or the test is disabled, or its not
testing anything useful... or its a broken test... or i've been
sucked into a biiaaar universe.

--jason












__



__
Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know.
Ask your question on www.Answers.yahoo.com








__ 
__

Bored stiff? Loosen up...
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
http://games.yahoo.com/games/front