Re: svn commit: r636529 [1/15] - in /geronimo/samples/branches/1.0: ./ migration-ejb-bmp/ migration-ejb-bmp/dd/ migration-ejb-bmp/dd/META-INF/ migration-ejb-bmp/jndi/ migration-ejb-bmp/src/ migration-

2008-03-13 Thread Joe Bohn


Hi Eric,

I'm confused about this new samples branch.

Is it your intention to release these migration samples independently of 
the other samples (this seems to contradict your earlier affirmation on 
the discussion thread that we should release them concurrently and 
mirror the Geronimo version).   When you mentioned you were thinking of 
putting the migration samples under 
samples/branches/#/migration-samplename I assumed the # was 2.1 (and 
echoed in trunk).


Is this because you are trying to figure out how to include them given 
that they are not built with maven?


Joe



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Author: ecraig
Date: Wed Mar 12 14:54:41 2008
New Revision: 636529

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=636529view=rev
Log:
Initial check in of 1.0 migration demo apps from wiki
License headers, LICENSE.txt, NOTICE.txt have been added to all packages/files.




snip/


Re: svn commit: r636529 [1/15] - in /geronimo/samples/branches/1.0: ./ migration-ejb-bmp/ migration-ejb-bmp/dd/ migration-ejb-bmp/dd/META-INF/ migration-ejb-bmp/jndi/ migration-ejb-bmp/src/ migration-

2008-03-13 Thread Erik B. Craig
Joe,

I am trying to back-port the migration samples relevant for the older
branches of the server into the svn repository.
I started by cleaning up the ones intended for the 1.0 version of the server
yesterday, and am working my way up from there, as all of them have not yet
been verified or modified to work on later versions of the server, while
some of them have and are attached to the wiki articles for those versions (
1.1, 2.0, 2.1)

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Hi Eric,

 I'm confused about this new samples branch.

 Is it your intention to release these migration samples independently of
 the other samples (this seems to contradict your earlier affirmation on
 the discussion thread that we should release them concurrently and
 mirror the Geronimo version).   When you mentioned you were thinking of
 putting the migration samples under
 samples/branches/#/migration-samplename I assumed the # was 2.1 (and
 echoed in trunk).

 Is this because you are trying to figure out how to include them given
 that they are not built with maven?

 Joe



 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Author: ecraig
  Date: Wed Mar 12 14:54:41 2008
  New Revision: 636529
 
  URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=636529view=rev
  Log:
  Initial check in of 1.0 migration demo apps from wiki
  License headers, LICENSE.txt, NOTICE.txt have been added to all
 packages/files.
 
 

 snip/




-- 
Erik B. Craig