Yes, I agree. How about merge server-security-config car into
j2ee-security(actually I think we should rename the car as server-security)?
Will open a jira to track this.
2010/3/24 Kevan Miller
> Thanks Rex. Makes sense.
>
> I guess that's consistent with our treatment of server-security-config
> dependencies, but I'm not convinced we're handling them correctly. Pretty
> certain that we can build alternate assemblies with the same basic
> problem...
>
> --kevan
>
> On Mar 24, 2010, at 5:40 AM, rwo...@apache.org wrote:
>
> > Author: rwonly
> > Date: Wed Mar 24 09:40:12 2010
> > New Revision: 926991
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=926991&view=rev
> > Log:
> > GERONIMO-5024 var/security/keystores seems to be a required directory,
> but is not being created for custom assemblies
> >
> > Modified:
> >geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-broker/pom.xml
> >
> > Modified:
> geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-broker/pom.xml
> > URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-broker/pom.xml?rev=926991&r1=926990&r2=926991&view=diff
> >
> ==
> > --- geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-broker/pom.xml
> (original)
> > +++ geronimo/server/branches/2.2/plugins/activemq/activemq-broker/pom.xml
> Wed Mar 24 09:40:12 2010
> > @@ -51,7 +51,14 @@
> > ${version}
> > car
> >
> > -
> > +
> > +
> > +org.apache.geronimo.framework
> > +server-security-config
> > +${version}
> > +car
> > +
> > +
> >
> > org.apache.geronimo.modules
> > geronimo-activemq
> >
> >
>
>
--
Lei Wang (Rex)
rwonly AT apache.org
