[STATUS] (httpd-2.1) Wed Mar 23 23:45:33 2005

2005-03-23 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size 
APACHE 2.1 STATUS:  -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2005-03-16 12:05:29 -0500 (Wed, 16 Mar 2005) $]

The current version of this file can be found at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS

Release history:
[NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]

2.1.4   : in development
2.1.3   : Released on  2/22/2005 as alpha.
2.1.2   : Released on 12/08/2004 as alpha.
2.1.1   : Released on 11/19/2004 as alpha.
2.1.0   : not released.

Please consult the following STATUS files for information on related projects:

* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/trunk/STATUS
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr-util/trunk/STATUS
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/STATUS

Contributors looking for a mission:

* Just do an egrep on "TODO" or "XXX" in the source.

* Review the bug database at: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/

* Review the "PatchAvailable" bugs in the bug database:

  
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&product=Apache+httpd-2.0&keywords=PatchAvailable

  After testing, you can append a comment saying "Reviewed and tested".

* Open bugs in the bug database.

CURRENT RELEASE NOTES:

RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:

* Handling of non-trailing / config by non-default handler is broken
  http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=105451701628081&w=2
  jerenkrantz asks: Why should this block a release?

* the edge connection filter cannot be removed 
  http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=105366252619530&w=2
  jerenkrantz asks: Why should this block a release?
  stas replies: because it requires a rewrite of the filters stack
implementation (you have suggested that) and once 2.2 is
released you can't do that anymore. 

CURRENT VOTES:

* httpd-std.conf and friends

  a) httpd-std.conf should be tailored by install (from src or
 binbuild) even if user has existing httpd.conf
 +1:   trawick, slive, gregames, ianh, Ken, wrowe, jwoolley, jim, nd,
   erikabele
   wrowe - prefer httpd.default.conf to avoid ambiguity with cvs

  b) tailored httpd-std.conf should be copied by install to
 sysconfdir/examples
 -0:   striker

  c) tailored httpd-std.conf should be installed to
 sysconfdir/examples or manualdir/exampleconf/
 +1:   slive, trawick, Ken, nd (prefer the latter), erikabele

  d) Installing a set of default config files when upgrading a server
 doesn't make ANY sense at all.
 +1:   ianh - medium/big sites don't use 'standard config' anyway, as it
  usually needs major customizations
 -1:   Ken, wrowe, jwoolley, jim, nd, erikabele
   wrowe - diff is wonderful when comparing old/new default configs,
   even for customized sites that ianh mentions
   jim - ... assuming that the default configs have been updated
 with the required inline docs to explain the
 changes

* If the parent process dies, should the remaining child processes
  "gracefully" self-terminate. Or maybe we should make it a runtime
  option, or have a concept of 2 parent processes (one being a 
  "hot spare").
  See: Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  Self-destruct: Ken, Martin, Lars
  Not self-destruct: BrianP, Ian, Cliff, BillS
  Make it runtime configurable: Aaron, jim, Justin, wrowe, rederpj, nd

  /* The below was a concept on *how* to handle the problem */
  Have 2 parents: +1: jim
  -1: Justin, wrowe, rederpj, nd
  +0: Lars, Martin (while standing by, could it do
something useful?)

* Make the worker MPM the default MPM for threaded Unix boxes.
  +1:   Justin, Ian, Cliff, BillS, striker, wrowe, nd
  +0:   BrianP, Aaron (mutex contention is looking better with the
latest code, let's continue tuning and testing), rederpj, jim
  -0:   Lars

  pquerna: Do we want to change this for 2.2?

RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP:

* Patches submitted to the bug database:
  
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&product=Apache+httpd-2.0&keywords=PatchAvailable

* The Event MPM does not work on Solaris 10. PR 34040.

* Filter stacks and subrequests, redirects and fast redirects.
  There's at least one PR that suffers from the current unclean behaviour
  (which lets the server send garbage): PR 17629
  nd says: Every subrequest should get its own filter stack with the
   subreq_core filter as bottom-most. That filter does two things:
 - swallow EOS buckets

[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 23 23:45:24 2005

2005-03-23 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size 
APACHE 2.0 STATUS:  -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2005-03-01 05:02:06 -0500 (Tue, 01 Mar 2005) $]

The current version of this file can be found at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

Release history:

2.0.54  : in development
2.0.53  : released February 7, 2005 as GA.
2.0.52  : released September 28, 2004 as GA.
2.0.51  : released September 15, 2004 as GA.
2.0.50  : released June 30, 2004 as GA.
2.0.49  : released March 19, 2004 as GA.
2.0.48  : released October 29, 2003 as GA.
2.0.47  : released July 09, 2003 as GA.
2.0.46  : released May 28, 2003 as GA.
2.0.45  : released April 1, 2003 as GA.
2.0.44  : released January 20, 2003 as GA.
2.0.43  : released October 3, 2002 as GA.
2.0.42  : released September 24, 2002 as GA.
2.0.41  : rolled September 16, 2002.  not released.
2.0.40  : released August 9, 2002 as GA.
2.0.39  : released June 17, 2002 as GA.
2.0.38  : rolled June 16, 2002.  not released.
2.0.37  : rolled June 11, 2002.  not released.
2.0.36  : released May 6, 2002 as GA.
2.0.35  : released April 5, 2002 as GA.
2.0.34  : tagged March 26, 2002.
2.0.33  : tagged March 6, 2002.  not released.
2.0.32  : released Feburary 16, 2002 as beta.
2.0.31  : rolled Feburary 1, 2002.  not released.
2.0.30  : tagged January 8, 2002.  not rolled.
2.0.29  : tagged November 27, 2001.  not rolled.
2.0.28  : released November 13, 2001 as beta.
2.0.27  : rolled November 6, 2001
2.0.26  : tagged October 16, 2001.  not rolled.
2.0.25  : rolled August 29, 2001
2.0.24  : rolled August 18, 2001
2.0.23  : rolled August 9, 2001
2.0.22  : rolled July 29, 2001
2.0.21  : rolled July 20, 2001
2.0.20  : rolled July 8, 2001
2.0.19  : rolled June 27, 2001
2.0.18  : rolled May 18, 2001
2.0.17  : rolled April 17, 2001
2.0.16  : rolled April 4, 2001
2.0.15  : rolled March 21, 2001
2.0.14  : rolled March 7, 2001
2.0a9   : released December 12, 2000
2.0a8   : released November 20, 2000
2.0a7   : released October 8, 2000
2.0a6   : released August 18, 2000
2.0a5   : released August 4, 2000
2.0a4   : released June 7, 2000
2.0a3   : released April 28, 2000
2.0a2   : released March 31, 2000
2.0a1   : released March 10, 2000

Please consult the following STATUS files for information on related projects:

* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/branches/0.9.x/STATUS
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr-util/branches/0.9.x/STATUS
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/docs/STATUS

Contributors looking for a mission:

* Just do an egrep on "TODO" or "XXX" in the source.

* Review the bug database at: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/

* Review the "PatchAvailable" bugs in the bug database:

  
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&product=Apache+httpd-2.0&keywords=PatchAvailable

  After testing, you can append a comment saying "Reviewed and tested".

* Open bugs in the bug database.

CURRENT RELEASE NOTES:

* Forward binary compatibility is expected of Apache 2.0.x releases, such
  that no MMN major number changes will occur.  Such changes can only be
  made in the trunk.

* All commits to branches/2.0.x must be reflected in SVN trunk,
  as well, if they apply.  Logical progression is commit to trunk,
  get feedback and votes in STATUS, and then merge into branches/2.0.x.

RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:

PATCHES TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
  [ please place SVN revisions from trunk here, so it is easy to
identify exactly what the proposed changes are! ]
  [ please append new backports at the end of this list not the top. ]

*) mod_ssl: Set r->user from SSLUsername earlier so that it's
   actually useful.
   http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=153280&view=rev
   http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=151493&view=rev
   a.k.a. http://www.apache.org/~jorton/ap_ssluser.diff
   PR: 31418
   jerenkrantz comments: 151493 deletes a chunk and adds a chunk,
  with 153280 moving that added hunk elsewhere.  My brain hurts.
   +1: jorton, jerenkrantz

*) Add a build script to create a solaris package.
   svn rev 124104
   +1: minfrin, trawick

*) Get some control chars out of ap_log_error() invocations.
   Patch from Eric Covener with tweak by trawick:
   http://httpd.apache.org/~trawick/covener-removecontrolchars-2.0.patch
   (2.1-dev already has these fixes)
   +1: trawick, jorton

*) util_ldap: Add the directive LDAPConnectionTimeout to control
   the socket timeout value when binding to an LDAP server
   svn rev 126565
   +1: bnicholes, trawick (no need for APLOG_NOERRNO in Apache >=2)

*) mod_ssl: fix to access mod_ssl-specific X509_STORE_CTX

Re: "Supported" Compilers

2005-03-23 Thread TOKILEY 

>> Is there a list of "supported" compilers?  I am having to compile using
>> gcc 2.96 and having some wierdness, but works fine on 3.3.  It may be
>> something else with the box, but just wanted to know if there was an
>> "official" list.
>
> wasn't the 2.96 one the redhat special version (known to be weird)?
> nd

Yes. Absolutely. It should have NEVER shipped with any product.
It builds 'bogus' COFF and ELF images yet you will never get one
single warning or error message.

It's trash. Don't use it.

Yours
Kevin Kiley




In a message dated 3/23/2005 11:38:45 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


> Is there a list of "supported" compilers?  I am having to compile using
> gcc 2.96 and having some wierdness, but works fine on 3.3.  It may be
> something else with the box, but just wanted to know if there was an
> "official" list.

wasn't the 2.96 one the redhat special version (known to be weird)?

nd

Re: "Supported" Compilers

2005-03-23 Thread Justin Erenkrantz 
--On Wednesday, March 23, 2005 12:11 PM -0500 Brian Akins 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Is there a list of "supported" compilers?  I am having to compile using
gcc 2.96 and having some wierdness, but works fine on 3.3.  It may be
something else with the box, but just wanted to know if there was an
"official" list.
It should work fine with gcc 2.96.  What errors are you seeing?  -- justin

Re: "Supported" Compilers

2005-03-23 Thread André Malo 
* Brian Akins wrote:

> Is there a list of "supported" compilers?  I am having to compile using
> gcc 2.96 and having some wierdness, but works fine on 3.3.  It may be
> something else with the box, but just wanted to know if there was an
> "official" list.

wasn't the 2.96 one the redhat special version (known to be weird)?

nd
-- 
"Solides und umfangreiches Buch"
  -- aus einer Rezension

"Supported" Compilers

2005-03-23 Thread Brian Akins 
Is there a list of "supported" compilers?  I am having to compile using 
gcc 2.96 and having some wierdness, but works fine on 3.3.  It may be 
something else with the box, but just wanted to know if there was an 
"official" list.

--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies

gprof and apache

2005-03-23 Thread Sergey Velikanov [UzPAK] 

I want profile httpd and I've compiled apache 1.3.33 with -pg -DGPROF
-g, but if i try to run apache, I receive

/usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache.sh start
Syntax error on line 206 of /usr/local/etc/apache/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_mmap_static.so into server: Service
unavailable

How should I compile http to support gprof.

#uname -rs
FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE

#cc -v
Using built-in specs.
Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.2 [FreeBSD] 20040728


Sergey Velikanov
Technical  Division
National Data Network "UzPAK"
e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.uzpak.uz/

Re: iSeries Apache 2.0.x - where is ap_mpm_query equivalent ?

2005-03-23 Thread Henri Gomez 
Well I've got some answers from IBM Rochester Labs.

The ap_mpm is supported on iSeries and the PTF SI17402, for product
5722-DG1, export it correctly and make ap_mpm.h.

So upgrade your iSeries Apache 2.0 :)


On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:19:23 +0100, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi to all,
> 
> I know there is many IBMers here who track and contribute on this list
> and while working with Mladen on jk 1.2.8 port for iSeries we saw that
> ap_mpm_query and AP_MPMQ_MAX_THREADS, used to get the ThreadsPerChild
> value, was absent from my iSeries V5R2.
> 
> As such we add the following in mod_jk.c
> 
> #if APR_HAS_THREADS
> #ifndef AS400
> if (ap_mpm_query(AP_MPMQ_MAX_THREADS, &mpm_threads) != APR_SUCCESS)
> mpm_threads = 1;
> #endif
> #endif
> 
> Now will working on jk 1.2.9 and the ap_mpm_query is still missing.
> 
> Questions :
> 
> - First, Did IBM still support Apache 2.0.x on iSeries ? I'm running
> on 2.0.49 based on my V5R3 dev system and it seems the 2.0.52 is
> available via PTF.
> 
> - Did there is a way to get the ThreadsPerChild  under iSeries ?
> 
> - The MPM model on iSeries is worker ? or pod ?
> 
> Thanks for IBMers clarifications (if they couldn't do it on public
> lists, I'll be happy to get informations on my private email).
> 
> Regards
>