Re: AP_CONN_CLOSE on force-response-1.0

2007-10-13 Thread Aleksey Midenkov
On Saturday 13 October 2007 02:21:17 Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Oct 12, 2007, at 12:25 AM, Aleksey Midenkov wrote:
> > On Thursday 11 October 2007 21:57:21 Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> >> On Oct 11, 2007, at 12:55 AM, Aleksey Midenkov wrote:
>  This is all irrelevant.  No current installation should need any of
>  those env variables set.  They exist solely for working around old
>  versions of old clients that no longer exist on the net.
> >>>
> >>> Not all... We need mod_proxy responding exactly with what protocol
> >>> backend
> >>> server sent. For this purpose we use force-response-1.0.
> >>
> >> Then you are violating the HTTP standard.
> >>
> >> Roy
> >
> > Why?
>
> RFC 2616, sec 3.1:
>
> Due to interoperability problems with HTTP/1.0 proxies discovered
> since the publication of RFC 2068[33], caching proxies MUST,
> gateways
> MAY, and tunnels MUST NOT upgrade the request to the highest version
> they support. The proxy/gateway's response to that request MUST
> be in
> the same major version as the request.
>
> Roy

But our proxy is not caching. Thank you for the warning though!


update for http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd needed...

2007-10-13 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi,
the file / link:
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/CURRENT-IS-2.2.4
seems no longer correct.

Guen.