Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.13 RC
Confirmed here as well... Good on OSX. On Dec 2, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Sander Temme wrote: On Nov 25, 2010, at 11:34 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote: After a year and a half, the apreq team would like to release version 2.13 of libapreq. Good PGP signature; good md5. Built and tested on an x64 Meerkat box, against bundled Apache2. Build against httpd and apr trunk fails: configure looks for apr-util which does not exist. I don't see this as a blocker. +1 S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A View my availability: http://tungle.me/sctemme
Re: svn commit: r1040177 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_protocol.c
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 04:37:49PM -, fua...@apache.org wrote: URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1040177view=rev Log: Supress compiler warning. ... == --- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_protocol.c (original) +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_protocol.c Mon Nov 29 16:37:49 2010 @@ -204,7 +204,12 @@ AP_DECLARE(int) ap_set_keepalive(request * THEN we can be persistent, which requires more headers be output. * * Note that the condition evaluation order is extremely important. + * + * Silent compiler warnings for (r-chunked = 1) with #pragma */ +#ifdef __WATCOMC__ +#pragma disable_message(105) +#endif Eww. Do you really need to litter the source code with this stuff? Can you not flip compiler switches in the Makefiles? Regards, Joe
Re: disk cache file rename errors on Windows
Is anyone successfully using mod_disk_cache on Windows? Thanks, Dan
Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.13 RC
On Nov 25, 2010, at 11:34 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote: After a year and a half, the apreq team would like to release version 2.13 of libapreq. Good PGP signature; good md5. Built and tested on an x64 Meerkat box, against bundled Apache2. Build against httpd and apr trunk fails: configure looks for apr-util which does not exist. I don't see this as a blocker. +1 S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A View my availability: http://tungle.me/sctemme
Re: disk cache file rename errors on Windows
On 23 Nov 2010, at 8:21 PM, Dan Poirier wrote: We're seeing errors like this from mod_disk_cache on Windows only: (OS 5)Access is denied. : disk_cache: rename tempfile to datafile failed: c:/temp/HTTPServer7/aptmpV0JKJ8 - c:/temp/HTTPServer7/wHY/FhW/b...@muvttlk@V4w.data under moderate to heavy load, resulting in requests failing. Looking at the code, the error message is thrown when apr_file_rename() fails, specifically when a temporary file is swung into place in the cache. Looking at the APR code, there is a forest of ifdefs that seem to choose one of MoveFileEx(), MoveFileW(), MoveFileExW() or MoveFile(). Ideally, the Microsoft API documentation should explain under what conditions the error Access is denied is thrown. Does Windows allow you to move a file into place while the replaced file is still open for read? Regards, Graham --
Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.13 RC
Confirmed here as well... Good on OSX. On Dec 2, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Sander Temme wrote: On Nov 25, 2010, at 11:34 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote: After a year and a half, the apreq team would like to release version 2.13 of libapreq. Good PGP signature; good md5. Built and tested on an x64 Meerkat box, against bundled Apache2. Build against httpd and apr trunk fails: configure looks for apr-util which does not exist. I don't see this as a blocker. +1 S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A View my availability: http://tungle.me/sctemme
Re: disk cache file rename errors on Windows
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: On 23 Nov 2010, at 8:21 PM, Dan Poirier wrote: We're seeing errors like this from mod_disk_cache on Windows only: (OS 5)Access is denied. : disk_cache: rename tempfile to datafile failed: c:/temp/HTTPServer7/aptmpV0JKJ8 - c:/temp/HTTPServer7/wHY/FhW/b...@muvttlk@V4w.data under moderate to heavy load, resulting in requests failing. Looking at the code, the error message is thrown when apr_file_rename() fails, specifically when a temporary file is swung into place in the cache. Looking at the APR code, there is a forest of ifdefs that seem to choose one of MoveFileEx(), MoveFileW(), MoveFileExW() or MoveFile(). Ideally, the Microsoft API documentation should explain under what conditions the error Access is denied is thrown. Does Windows allow you to move a file into place while the replaced file is still open for read? Disclaimer: My last real Windows programming was on WfW 3.11, so please, someone with up-to-date Windows programming experience correct me as needed. From the doc for MoveFileEx (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa365240%28VS.85%29.aspx), you can pass a flag telling Windows to do the move on the next reboot (also see http://support.microsoft.com/kb/140570) , apparently to work around an inability to rename another file over a file in use. So I think the answer to your question is no. The doc for error 0x05 at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms681382%28v=VS.85%29.aspx consists, in its entirety, of Access is denied.. Maybe there's more explanation elsewhere. -- Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com
Re: disk cache file rename errors on Windows
On 12/2/2010 11:23 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: Does Windows allow you to move a file into place while the replaced file is still open for read? This is illustrative of Win32 limitations; The DeleteFile function fails if an application attempts to delete a file that is open for normal I/O or as a memory-mapped file. The DeleteFile function marks a file for deletion on close. Therefore, the file deletion does not occur until the last handle to the file is closed. Subsequent calls to CreateFile to open the file fail with ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED. Which is to say, unlink/rename or rename-over-existing would have the same net behavior, and the same failure case.
Re: disk cache file rename errors on Windows
I'd say I am. Even though it is not a high traffic server, the last time I got one of those errors was October 8th. looking further back, it is always following one specific custom error doc that oops, didn't exist till now cause I forgot to generate a new on when I changed the look of the site. IfModule cache_module CacheIgnoreHeaders Set-Cookie IfModule disk_cache_module CacheEnable disk / CacheDirLevels 5 CacheDirLength 4 CacheRoot /path/to/cache /IfModule /IfModule Original Message --- Is anyone successfully using mod_disk_cache on Windows?
