trunk APR version requirement
On trunk the configure script requires APR 1.4 but mod_proxy_balancer fails to build with APR < 1.5 since it uses apr_escape.h unconditionally [1]. Thinking of 2.5/2.6 it might make sense to bump up the APR version requirement to something newer, any opinions? RHEL 8 and Bionic (18.04LTS) both have APR 1.6 so that might make a reasonable target for those wanting to build against distro APR versions. grep for APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST -- ./server/mpm/simple/simple_run.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,4,0) ./server/mpm/event/event.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,4,0) ./server/util_expr_eval.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,5,0) ./server/util_expr_eval.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,6,0) ./server/util_expr_eval.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,6,0) ./server/listen.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,7,0) ./server/listen.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,7,0) ./server/listen.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,7,0) ./server/vhost.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,7,0) ./server/vhost.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,7,0) ./modules/proxy/mod_serf.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,4,0) ./modules/ssl/mod_ssl_ct.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,5,0) ./modules/filters/mod_crypto.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) ./modules/filters/mod_crypto.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) && \ ./modules/lua/lua_passwd.h:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) ./modules/lua/lua_passwd.h:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) || \ ./modules/metadata/mod_remoteip.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,5,0) ./support/passwd_common.h:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) ./support/passwd_common.h:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) || \ Regards, Joe [1] https://travis-ci.org/notroj/httpd/jobs/609143667
Re: trunk APR version requirement
+1 > Am 08.11.2019 um 10:40 schrieb Joe Orton : > > On trunk the configure script requires APR 1.4 but mod_proxy_balancer > fails to build with APR < 1.5 since it uses apr_escape.h unconditionally > [1]. Thinking of 2.5/2.6 it might make sense to bump up the APR version > requirement to something newer, any opinions? RHEL 8 and Bionic > (18.04LTS) both have APR 1.6 so that might make a reasonable target for > those wanting to build against distro APR versions. > > grep for APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST -- > > ./server/mpm/simple/simple_run.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,4,0) > ./server/mpm/event/event.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,4,0) > ./server/util_expr_eval.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,5,0) > ./server/util_expr_eval.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,6,0) > ./server/util_expr_eval.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,6,0) > ./server/listen.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,7,0) > ./server/listen.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,7,0) > ./server/listen.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,7,0) > ./server/vhost.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,7,0) > ./server/vhost.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,7,0) > ./modules/proxy/mod_serf.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,4,0) > ./modules/ssl/mod_ssl_ct.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,5,0) > ./modules/filters/mod_crypto.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) > ./modules/filters/mod_crypto.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) && \ > ./modules/lua/lua_passwd.h:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) > ./modules/lua/lua_passwd.h:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) || \ > ./modules/metadata/mod_remoteip.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,5,0) > ./support/passwd_common.h:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) > ./support/passwd_common.h:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) || \ > > Regards, Joe > > [1] https://travis-ci.org/notroj/httpd/jobs/609143667 >
Re: svn commit: r1869459 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: .travis.yml test/travis_before_linux.sh test/travis_run_linux.sh
On 11/06/2019 12:45 PM, jor...@apache.org wrote: > Author: jorton > Date: Wed Nov 6 11:45:21 2019 > New Revision: 1869459 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1869459&view=rev > Log: > Move before/run scripts out of .travis.yml. > > Reviewed by: elukey > > Added: > httpd/httpd/trunk/test/travis_before_linux.sh (with props) > httpd/httpd/trunk/test/travis_run_linux.sh (with props) > Modified: > httpd/httpd/trunk/.travis.yml > > Added: httpd/httpd/trunk/test/travis_before_linux.sh > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/test/travis_before_linux.sh?rev=1869459&view=auto > == > --- httpd/httpd/trunk/test/travis_before_linux.sh (added) > +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/test/travis_before_linux.sh Wed Nov 6 11:45:21 2019 > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ > +#!/bin/bash -ex > +svn export -q https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/trunk srclib/apr Hmm. Why checking out apr trunk, when we supply --with-apr=/usr --with-apr-util=/usr to configure? Just for buildconf to work? Regards Rüdiger
Re: svn commit: r1869459 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: .travis.yml test/travis_before_linux.sh test/travis_run_linux.sh
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 11:04:32AM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > On 11/06/2019 12:45 PM, jor...@apache.org wrote: > > == > > --- httpd/httpd/trunk/test/travis_before_linux.sh (added) > > +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/test/travis_before_linux.sh Wed Nov 6 11:45:21 2019 > > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ > > +#!/bin/bash -ex > > +svn export -q https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/trunk srclib/apr > > Hmm. Why checking out apr trunk, when we supply --with-apr=/usr > --with-apr-util=/usr to configure? > Just for buildconf to work? Yup, I had it there for buildconf. It was removed in r1869533 and actually we can switch to running buildconf against the APR version where available, thanks for the prompt. Regards, Joe
Re: trunk APR version requirement
+1 Regards Rüdiger On 11/08/2019 10:45 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > +1 > >> Am 08.11.2019 um 10:40 schrieb Joe Orton : >> >> On trunk the configure script requires APR 1.4 but mod_proxy_balancer >> fails to build with APR < 1.5 since it uses apr_escape.h unconditionally >> [1]. Thinking of 2.5/2.6 it might make sense to bump up the APR version >> requirement to something newer, any opinions? RHEL 8 and Bionic >> (18.04LTS) both have APR 1.6 so that might make a reasonable target for >> those wanting to build against distro APR versions. >> >> grep for APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST -- >> >> ./server/mpm/simple/simple_run.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,4,0) >> ./server/mpm/event/event.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,4,0) >> ./server/util_expr_eval.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,5,0) >> ./server/util_expr_eval.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,6,0) >> ./server/util_expr_eval.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,6,0) >> ./server/listen.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,7,0) >> ./server/listen.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,7,0) >> ./server/listen.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,7,0) >> ./server/vhost.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,7,0) >> ./server/vhost.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,7,0) >> ./modules/proxy/mod_serf.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,4,0) >> ./modules/ssl/mod_ssl_ct.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,5,0) >> ./modules/filters/mod_crypto.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) >> ./modules/filters/mod_crypto.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) && \ >> ./modules/lua/lua_passwd.h:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) >> ./modules/lua/lua_passwd.h:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) || \ >> ./modules/metadata/mod_remoteip.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,5,0) >> ./support/passwd_common.h:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) >> ./support/passwd_common.h:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) || \ >> >> Regards, Joe >> >> [1] https://travis-ci.org/notroj/httpd/jobs/609143667 >> > >
Re: svn commit: r1869551 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
I would like what Joe had for breakfast this week. Seems energizing. ;-) > Am 08.11.2019 um 13:44 schrieb jor...@apache.org: > > Author: jorton > Date: Fri Nov 8 12:44:33 2019 > New Revision: 1869551 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1869551&view=rev > Log: > RTC exception for Travis. > > Reviewed by: covener, ylavic, elukey > > Modified: >httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1869551&r1=1869550&r2=1869551&view=diff > == > --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Fri Nov 8 12:44:33 2019 > @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ CURRENT RELEASE NOTES: > . non-Unix, single-platform code > . routine APLOGNO() backports > . .gdbinit > +. Travis integration: .travis.yml and test/travis*.sh > > RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: > > >
Re: trunk APR version requirement
+1 Joe Orton schrieb am Fr., 8. Nov. 2019, 10:40: > On trunk the configure script requires APR 1.4 but mod_proxy_balancer > fails to build with APR < 1.5 since it uses apr_escape.h unconditionally > [1]. Thinking of 2.5/2.6 it might make sense to bump up the APR version > requirement to something newer, any opinions? RHEL 8 and Bionic > (18.04LTS) both have APR 1.6 so that might make a reasonable target for > those wanting to build against distro APR versions. > > grep for APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST -- > > ./server/mpm/simple/simple_run.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,4,0) > ./server/mpm/event/event.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,4,0) > ./server/util_expr_eval.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,5,0) > ./server/util_expr_eval.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,6,0) > ./server/util_expr_eval.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,6,0) > ./server/listen.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,7,0) > ./server/listen.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,7,0) > ./server/listen.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,7,0) > ./server/vhost.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,7,0) > ./server/vhost.c:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,7,0) > ./modules/proxy/mod_serf.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,4,0) > ./modules/ssl/mod_ssl_ct.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,5,0) > ./modules/filters/mod_crypto.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) > ./modules/filters/mod_crypto.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) && \ > ./modules/lua/lua_passwd.h:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) > ./modules/lua/lua_passwd.h:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) || \ > ./modules/metadata/mod_remoteip.c:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(1,5,0) > ./support/passwd_common.h:#if !APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) > ./support/passwd_common.h:#if APR_VERSION_AT_LEAST(2,0,0) || \ > > Regards, Joe > > [1] https://travis-ci.org/notroj/httpd/jobs/609143667 > >
Re: trunk APR version requirement
On 08 Nov 2019, at 11:40, Joe Orton wrote: > On trunk the configure script requires APR 1.4 but mod_proxy_balancer > fails to build with APR < 1.5 since it uses apr_escape.h unconditionally > [1]. Thinking of 2.5/2.6 it might make sense to bump up the APR version > requirement to something newer, any opinions? RHEL 8 and Bionic > (18.04LTS) both have APR 1.6 so that might make a reasonable target for > those wanting to build against distro APR versions. I’m keen for apr(-util) v1.7, because there is JSON and JOSE (AKA JWT) support that I want to take advantage of on the 2.5/2.6 series. Given that 1.6 is in current long term support OSes as described above, I’m also happy for apr(-util) 1.6 with the option to use v1.7 where required. Regards, Graham — smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
