Re: trunk APR version requirement
Very happy about this. Thanks a lot! > Am 12.11.2019 um 16:10 schrieb Yann Ylavic : > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 3:43 PM Luca Toscano wrote: >> >> Il giorno mar 12 nov 2019 alle ore 15:24 Eric Covener >> ha scritto: >>> 1. If travis results look stable this week, turn on e-mail notifications to dev@ on Friday. 2. Friday following (22nd), disable the broken bits of buildbot if nobody has salvaged it. >>> >>> +1 >> >> +1 > > +1 (and great job Jo & Luca!)
Re: trunk APR version requirement
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 3:43 PM Luca Toscano wrote: > > Il giorno mar 12 nov 2019 alle ore 15:24 Eric Covener > ha scritto: > > > > > > > > 1. If travis results look stable this week, turn on e-mail notifications > > > to dev@ on Friday. > > > > > > 2. Friday following (22nd), disable the broken bits of buildbot if > > > nobody has salvaged it. > > > > +1 > > +1 +1 (and great job Jo & Luca!)
Re: trunk APR version requirement
Il giorno mar 12 nov 2019 alle ore 15:24 Eric Covener ha scritto: > > > > > 1. If travis results look stable this week, turn on e-mail notifications > > to dev@ on Friday. > > > > 2. Friday following (22nd), disable the broken bits of buildbot if > > nobody has salvaged it. > > +1 +1
Re: trunk APR version requirement
> > 1. If travis results look stable this week, turn on e-mail notifications > to dev@ on Friday. > > 2. Friday following (22nd), disable the broken bits of buildbot if > nobody has salvaged it. +1
Re: trunk APR version requirement
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 02:39:58PM +0100, Luca Toscano wrote: > Il giorno mar 12 nov 2019 alle ore 12:40 Joe Orton > ha scritto: > > > > Thanks to everyone who gave feedback, I made the change to require APR > > 1.6 in r1869684. While I kept the Travis builds passing, buildbot broke > > since it's doing a trunk build against the system APR. Does anybody > > know if there is a buildbot slave running Bionic? > > Or maybe we could think about swapping buildbot with Travis and set > notifications for the latter to dev@. Travis seems working really well > and after all your recent work IIUC it is already testing way more > than what buildbot does :) I'm fine with disabling bb if nobody wants to rescue it - and I didn't deliberately sabotage it! We need to keep the doxygen bb stuff running, that has failed to build as well though I think it's only a non-reproducible failure, because an existing checkout has been reconfigured using the included APR (trunk) and still has objects built against APR 1.x. How about: 1. If travis results look stable this week, turn on e-mail notifications to dev@ on Friday. 2. Friday following (22nd), disable the broken bits of buildbot if nobody has salvaged it. Regards, Joe
Re: trunk APR version requirement
Il giorno mar 12 nov 2019 alle ore 12:40 Joe Orton ha scritto: > > Thanks to everyone who gave feedback, I made the change to require APR > 1.6 in r1869684. While I kept the Travis builds passing, buildbot broke > since it's doing a trunk build against the system APR. Does anybody > know if there is a buildbot slave running Bionic? Or maybe we could think about swapping buildbot with Travis and set notifications for the latter to dev@. Travis seems working really well and after all your recent work IIUC it is already testing way more than what buildbot does :) Luca
Re: modify bugzilla resolved statuses?
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 2:01 PM Daniel Gruno wrote: > > On 12/11/2019 13.57, Eric Covener wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 7:47 AM Daniel Gruno wrote: > >> > >> On 12/11/2019 13.29, Eric Covener wrote: > >>> Is there a way to add new sub-statuses under Resolved in our bugzilla? > >>> > >>> It would be nice to have something kind of neutral for things that are > >>> essentially answered questions rather than "invalid" or > >>> "worksforsome". I think "invalid" is kind of impolite and invites > >>> argumentation. > >>> > >> > >> Yes, how about 'INFORMATIONPROVIDED' ? > > > > That helps, or even "CLOSED" > > > > Added both for good measure :) I quite like Eric's subliminal s/worksforme/worksforsome/ too, if as easy :)
Re: modify bugzilla resolved statuses?
On 12/11/2019 13.57, Eric Covener wrote: On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 7:47 AM Daniel Gruno wrote: On 12/11/2019 13.29, Eric Covener wrote: Is there a way to add new sub-statuses under Resolved in our bugzilla? It would be nice to have something kind of neutral for things that are essentially answered questions rather than "invalid" or "worksforsome". I think "invalid" is kind of impolite and invites argumentation. Yes, how about 'INFORMATIONPROVIDED' ? That helps, or even "CLOSED" Added both for good measure :)
Re: modify bugzilla resolved statuses?
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 7:47 AM Daniel Gruno wrote: > > On 12/11/2019 13.29, Eric Covener wrote: > > Is there a way to add new sub-statuses under Resolved in our bugzilla? > > > > It would be nice to have something kind of neutral for things that are > > essentially answered questions rather than "invalid" or > > "worksforsome". I think "invalid" is kind of impolite and invites > > argumentation. > > > > Yes, how about 'INFORMATIONPROVIDED' ? That helps, or even "CLOSED"
Re: modify bugzilla resolved statuses?
On 12/11/2019 13.29, Eric Covener wrote: Is there a way to add new sub-statuses under Resolved in our bugzilla? It would be nice to have something kind of neutral for things that are essentially answered questions rather than "invalid" or "worksforsome". I think "invalid" is kind of impolite and invites argumentation. Yes, how about 'INFORMATIONPROVIDED' ?
modify bugzilla resolved statuses?
Is there a way to add new sub-statuses under Resolved in our bugzilla? It would be nice to have something kind of neutral for things that are essentially answered questions rather than "invalid" or "worksforsome". I think "invalid" is kind of impolite and invites argumentation. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
Re: trunk APR version requirement
Thanks to everyone who gave feedback, I made the change to require APR 1.6 in r1869684. While I kept the Travis builds passing, buildbot broke since it's doing a trunk build against the system APR. Does anybody know if there is a buildbot slave running Bionic? Regards, Joe
buildbot failure in on httpd-trunk
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder httpd-trunk while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/httpd-trunk/builds/4251 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: bb_slave6_ubuntu Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler scheduler named 'httpd-trunk-on-commit' triggered this build Build Source Stamp: [branch httpd/httpd/trunk] 1869684 Blamelist: jorton,lgentis BUILD FAILED: failed configure Sincerely, -The Buildbot
