Re: setsockopt error

2002-01-13 Thread Don Hughes 

Sorry for the delayed reply.

Yes, I am using apachectl.

I just re-tested with the current source, and no longer get the error.


On 25 Dec 2001 at 15:27, Aaron Bannert wrote:

 On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 02:46:08PM -0500, Don Hughes wrote:
  Apache2.0
  
  If all of my vhosts are of the form:
  
  VirtualHost *:nn
  
  and if there is a Listen for a port (81)  that does NOT appear in a VirtualHost 
  directive, then I get:
  
  ... [crit] (88)Socket operation on non-socket: make_sock: for address [::]:81, 
  setsockopt: (SO_REUSEADDR)
 
 How are you starting Apache? bin/apachectl?
 
 -aaron
 

...don...don
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: PR 7492

2001-12-25 Thread Don Hughes 

I converted a working Apache1.3 server to Apache2.0 on a SuSE Linux system 
with IPV6 support.

All httpd.conf address references are in IPV4 format, all log/status/error messages 
show all addresses in IPV4 format.  However, I had to use IPV6 address in the 
VHosts sections or the incoming requests would not match.

VirtualHost :::10.168.xxx.yyy:8080 

This certainly was not intuitive, and took several days of fussing to discover.


...don
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

configtest

2001-12-25 Thread Don Hughes 

Trying to use configtest with a httpd.conf file that has a line like:

VirtualHost 82

gives:

../apachectl: line 187: 2066 Sementation fault $HTTPD - t

...don
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

setsockopt error

2001-12-25 Thread Don Hughes 

Apache2.0

If all of my vhosts are of the form:

VirtualHost *:nn

and if there is a Listen for a port (81)  that does NOT appear in a VirtualHost 
directive, then I get:

... [crit] (88)Socket operation on non-socket: make_sock: for address [::]:81, 
setsockopt: (SO_REUSEADDR)

...don
[EMAIL PROTECTED]