Re: incubator proposal for (what was once) Inktomi Traffic Server
Hello, On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > I think this is an interesting opportunity to compare > different implementations and share code where desirable. > I haven't seen anyone comment on the proposal yet. > Just out of curiosity, Flickr has been a die hard users of Squid. Did your team ever convinced them to use YTS?
Re: incubator proposal for (what was once) Inktomi Traffic Server
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Albert Lash wrote: > Speaking of code, I'd be very glad to see more C / C++ in the Apache > projects. Java is fine but I think Apache went overboard with it a > little. +1
Re: What do you think about Lighttpd?
On 2/27/07, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You have the choice. If more people use mod_php than fastcgi, that's because they're choosing it. yes, this is really interesting. sometimes i really don't understand them... especially php does not recommended threaded MPM in apache2...so continue to use apache 1.x ? :) Since Apache 2.0, we've had the MPM architecture, which means you can plug in your choice of processing model. That's also how Apache 2 works cross-platform, rather than being (like Apache 1) a Unix server ported with lots of compromises in performance/etc to other platforms. i was surprised that event based MPM did not catch too much attention of Apache developers? maybe i am wrong? :) howa
Re: What do you think about Lighttpd?
Hello, Thanks for your reply first. I understand Apache already support fastcgi, however, phper most likely will prefer mod_php, so fastcgi in Apache is not as popular as in other http servers. Similarly, later Apache 2.x might officially support event based model rather than multi-process one. We know that fastcgi & event based model have some very attractive reasons, such as better usage of cpu time, more robust even under high loading. I am not asking whether/when Apache support these functions, I want to learn more abt from the Apache httpd developers, their way of thinking behind these approaches..why they are not good or not suitable in Apache, why? I belive there must be some reasons behind. :) Thanks. howa On 2/27/07, Arnold Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, 1. Apache 2.2 can be used event based request handling, though is is still under development. http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/event.html 2. Apache supports fast cgi
What do you think about Lighttpd?
Can anyone give some comments abt in their implementations which are difference from Httpd on the following area: 1. single-threaded, event-based, (powered by epoll) 2. fast cgi support seems that these two points are quite attractive to use, why seldom heard abt them in Httpd world? :) Thanks for any comments.
