Re: [PATCH] mod_speling
Committed to trunk. -wsv On Jun 14, 2006, at 12:27 AM, olivier Thereaux wrote: On 9 Jun 2006, at 02:21, Wilfredo Sánchez Vega wrote: This looks fine, but can you add a patch to the docs? The feature isn't useful if nobody knows it's there. Sure. The patch is attached in this mail, but if I understand correctly, it should rather be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? How about translations? Is there any process to ensure that the localized versions will remain up to date? Or should I take care of that, too? Thanks, -- olivier
Re: [PATCH] mod_speling
On 9 Jun 2006, at 02:21, Wilfredo Sánchez Vega wrote: This looks fine, but can you add a patch to the docs? The feature isn't useful if nobody knows it's there. Sure. The patch is attached in this mail, but if I understand correctly, it should rather be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? How about translations? Is there any process to ensure that the localized versions will remain up to date? Or should I take care of that, too? Thanks, -- olivier patch_docs_mod_speling.patch Description: Binary data
Re: [PATCH] mod_speling
This looks fine, but can you add a patch to the docs? The feature isn't useful if nobody knows it's there. Thanks, -wsv On May 30, 2006, at 4:30 PM, olivier Thereaux wrote: Hello, This is a followup to a (very) old thread about mod_speling on the httpd-dev list: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/23.mbox/% [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, Mar 03, 2000, Hugo Haas wrote: On Fri, Mar 03, 2000, Martin Kraemer wrote: On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 04:22:36PM -0500, Bruce R Miller wrote: [..] Our thought was to add an option, (CheckSpelling CaseOnly, instead of CheckSpelling on, or ...) that would have it automatically redirect _only_ if it were a case correction Yes, the proposal to even restrict the functionality to case correction ONLY has been suggested a while ago. I would welcome this, too, because mod_speling can be misused to "poke around" and look what other file are there I coded that some time ago. I will send you the patch as soon as I find it. :-) It appears that patch was never sent to the apache developers' community, but we have actually been using it on the W3C Web site for many years, where it has allowed us to enable mod_speling for user convenience, without creating too huge a volume of phantom URIs. I have recently dug up the patch, and adapted it for each major version of the apache httpd server (based on the sources for the 1.3.6, 2.0.58 and 2.2.2 releases). The three patch files are attached to this mail. Would it be possible to have these applied to the code tree? If so, I guess there would be documentation changes, as well, and I would be more than happy to help with those, too. Kind regards, olivier. -- olivier Thereaux - W3C - http://www.w3.org/People/olivier/ W3C Open Source Software: http://www.w3.org/Status
[PATCH] mod_speling
Hello, This is a followup to a (very) old thread about mod_speling on the httpd-dev list: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/23.mbox/% [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, Mar 03, 2000, Hugo Haas wrote: On Fri, Mar 03, 2000, Martin Kraemer wrote: On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 04:22:36PM -0500, Bruce R Miller wrote: [..] Our thought was to add an option, (CheckSpelling CaseOnly, instead of CheckSpelling on, or ...) that would have it automatically redirect _only_ if it were a case correction Yes, the proposal to even restrict the functionality to case correction ONLY has been suggested a while ago. I would welcome this, too, because mod_speling can be misused to "poke around" and look what other file are there I coded that some time ago. I will send you the patch as soon as I find it. :-) It appears that patch was never sent to the apache developers' community, but we have actually been using it on the W3C Web site for many years, where it has allowed us to enable mod_speling for user convenience, without creating too huge a volume of phantom URIs. I have recently dug up the patch, and adapted it for each major version of the apache httpd server (based on the sources for the 1.3.6, 2.0.58 and 2.2.2 releases). The three patch files are attached to this mail. Would it be possible to have these applied to the code tree? If so, I guess there would be documentation changes, as well, and I would be more than happy to help with those, too. Kind regards, olivier. -- olivier Thereaux - W3C - http://www.w3.org/People/olivier/ W3C Open Source Software: http://www.w3.org/Status mod_speling_1_3_36.patch Description: Binary data mod_speling_2_0_58.patch Description: Binary data mod_speling_2_2_2.patch Description: Binary data
