[RESULTS] Re: [VOTE] CMS site migration
Tally ho! We have a winnah in the +1's: +1: pctony, rbowen, joes, igalic, rpluem, minfrin, humbedooh. 0: jimjag, trawick -1: As such the vote passes and I'll do the deed sometime later today. The trunk/README has already been updated Graham, now time to remove all that java fun. > > From: Joe Schaefer >To: "dev@httpd.apache.org" >Cc: "d...@httpd.apache.org" >Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2012 3:14 PM >Subject: [VOTE] CMS site migration > >Please cast your vote accordingly: > >[ ] : +1 to migrate httpd-site to the CMS >[ ] : 0 don't care one way or the other >[ ] : -1 leave httpd-site as-is, because... > >Note: this vote is only for httpd-site, not >any of the externals (eg the docs trees) that are pulled in. > >T-72 hours before the results are tallied. >Voting rules are majority-consensus, same >as for releases. > > >
Re: [VOTE] CMS site migration
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Please cast your vote accordingly: [X] : 0 don't care one way or the other
Re: [VOTE] CMS site migration
Death to tables for styling html! - Original Message - > From: Daniel Gruno > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 8:38 AM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] CMS site migration > > On 08 May 2012, at 9:14 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> >> Please cast your vote accordingly: >> >> [X] : +1 to migrate httpd-site to the CMS > > > Since I'm the evil munchkin behind a lot of this, I should probably vote > as well. So there :). >
Re: [VOTE] CMS site migration
On 08 May 2012, at 9:14 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > Please cast your vote accordingly: > > [X] : +1 to migrate httpd-site to the CMS Since I'm the evil munchkin behind a lot of this, I should probably vote as well. So there :).
Re: [VOTE] CMS site migration
Damned Y! loves to munge whitespace. The link is http://s.apache.org/cms-cli - Original Message - > From: Joe Schaefer > To: "d...@httpd.apache.org" ; "dev@httpd.apache.org" > > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 6:34 AM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] CMS site migration > >T he only significant workflow change is thatinstead of building > the docs you will need to "publish" them,either via the CMS site > or through the http://s.apache.org/cms-cliscript. > > Nevertheless I'll update the README file in trunk with the full > details. > > > > - Original Message - >> From: Graham Leggett >> To: dev@httpd.apache.org >> Cc: "d...@httpd.apache.org" >> Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 6:06 AM >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] CMS site migration >> >> On 08 May 2012, at 9:14 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> >>> Please cast your vote accordingly: >>> >>> [X] : +1 to migrate httpd-site to the CMS >> >> This is however with the condition that the process to update the CMS is >> properly documented, and all stale documentation relating to the old way of > >> doing things is removed, so there is no chance for confusion. >> >> Regards, >> Graham >> -- >> >
Re: [VOTE] CMS site migration
The only significant workflow change is thatinstead of building the docs you will need to "publish" them,either via the CMS site or through the http://s.apache.org/cms-cliscript. Nevertheless I'll update the README file in trunk with the full details. - Original Message - > From: Graham Leggett > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Cc: "d...@httpd.apache.org" > Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 6:06 AM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] CMS site migration > > On 08 May 2012, at 9:14 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > >> Please cast your vote accordingly: >> >> [X] : +1 to migrate httpd-site to the CMS > > This is however with the condition that the process to update the CMS is > properly documented, and all stale documentation relating to the old way of > doing things is removed, so there is no chance for confusion. > > Regards, > Graham > -- >
Re: [VOTE] CMS site migration
On 08 May 2012, at 9:14 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Please cast your vote accordingly: > > [X] : +1 to migrate httpd-site to the CMS This is however with the condition that the process to update the CMS is properly documented, and all stale documentation relating to the old way of doing things is removed, so there is no chance for confusion. Regards, Graham -- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
RE: [VOTE] CMS site migration
> -Original Message- > From: Joe Schaefer [mailto:joe_schae...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Dienstag, 8. Mai 2012 21:14 > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Cc: d...@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] CMS site migration > > Please cast your vote accordingly: > > [X] : +1 to migrate httpd-site to the CMS > [ ] : 0 don't care one way or the other > [ ] : -1 leave httpd-site as-is, because... > > Note: this vote is only for httpd-site, not > any of the externals (eg the docs trees) that are pulled in. > > T-72 hours before the results are tallied. > Voting rules are majority-consensus, same > as for releases. Regards Rüdiger
Re: [VOTE] CMS site migration
On May 8, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Please cast your vote accordingly: > > [X] : 0 don't care one way or the other
Re: [VOTE] CMS site migration
> Please cast your vote accordingly: > > [X] : +1 to migrate httpd-site to the CMS
Re: [VOTE] CMS site migration
On May 8, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > [ +1 ] to migrate httpd-site to the CMS -- Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen rbo...@apache.org
Re: [VOTE] CMS site migration
Joe Schaefer wrote on Tue, May 08, 2012 at 12:14:05PM -0700: > Please cast your vote accordingly: > [ x ] : +1 to migrate httpd-site to the CMS -- Cheers, Tony --- Tony Stevenson t...@pc-tony.com // pct...@apache.org // t...@caret.cam.ac.uk GPG: 1024D/51047D66 http://blog.pc-tony.com --- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
[VOTE] CMS site migration
Please cast your vote accordingly: [ ] : +1 to migrate httpd-site to the CMS [ ] : 0 don't care one way or the other [ ] : -1 leave httpd-site as-is, because... Note: this vote is only for httpd-site, not any of the externals (eg the docs trees) that are pulled in. T-72 hours before the results are tallied. Voting rules are majority-consensus, same as for releases.
