Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as httpd-2.4.54
Am 06.06.2022 um 16:25 schrieb Stefan Eissing: Here we go again! Sorry for the repeats, but that is why we build candidates, right? Hi all, Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as 2.4.54: [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. +1 to release and thanks a bunch for RM! The full range of unit tests is still running, but enough have completed for a vote. I actually used rc2 plus the one "#if" patch which got included in rc3 to build and test, but also did the simple release checks for rc3. ! KEYS maybe missing (see other mail) - Sigs and hashes OK - contents of tarballs identical - contents of tag and tarballs identical except for expected deltas Built on - Solaris 10 Sparc as 32 Bit Binaries - SLES 11+12+15 (64 Bits) - RHEL 6+7+8 (64 Bits) For all platforms built - with default (shared) and static modules (Solaris only shared modules) - with module set reallyall - using --enable-load-all-modules - using libraries - APR/APU - bundled deps tarball - 1.7.0/1.6.1 - 1.6.5/1.6.1 - 1.7.x(r1901250)/1.7.x(r1901250) with libxml2 - 1.7.x(r1901250)/1.7.x(r1901250) with expat - 1.6.x(r1898636)/1.6.x(r1901250) - trunk(r1901250) with libxml2 - trunk(r1901250) with expat - OpenSSL 3.0.3, 1.1.1o, 1.1.1, 1.0.2u, 1.0.2, 0.9.8zh, 0.9.8b - expat 2.4.8 - pcre 10.39, sometimes 10.40 - lua 5.4.4 (compiled with LUA_COMPAT_MODULE) - libxml2 2.9.14 - libnghttp2 1.47.0 - brotli 1.0.9 - curl 7.83.1 - jansson 2.14 - libldap 2.6.2 (2.5.7 with OpenSSL 1.1.1, 2.4.59 with OpenSSL 1.0.2*, 2.4.52 with OpenSSL 0.9.8*) - on Solaris also platform ldap library - in total 96 builds per platform, 60 on Solaris - Tool chain: - platform gcc except on Solaris (gcc 9.3.0 Solaris 10) - CFLAGS: -O2 -g -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing - on Solaris additionally -mpcu=v9, -D_XOPEN_SOURCE, -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED=1, -D__EXTENSIONS__ and -D_XPG6 All 636 builds succeeded. - compiler warnings: - only on Solaris (GCC 9.3.0): srclib/apr/locks/unix/proc_mutex.c:979:49: warning: 'mutex_proc_pthread_cond_methods' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] - deprecation warnings when building against OpenSSL 3.0.0, see other thread Tested for - SLES 11+12+15 - RHEL 6+7+8 - Solaris 10 Sparc - MPMs prefork, worker, event - log level trace8 - Perl client bundle build against OpenSSL 3.0.0, , 1.1.1g plus patches, 1.1.0l, 1.0.2u and 0.9.8zh Every OpenSSL version in the client tested with every OpenSSL version in the server. 15 unit test runs (3 MPMS x 5 OpenSSL clients) per server build. About 2.400 unit test runs are done, most for shared module builds. Some local adjustments to tests were used: - t/modules/buffer.t: removing huge buffer tests -my $bigsize = 10; +my $bigsize = 5; The following test failures were seen: a t/modules/buffer.t line 37 Test 4 (411 times), test 8 (217 times) and 12 (18 times) Not a regression Only on RHEL 6, SLES 11 and Solaris 10. b Various tests in t/modules/cgi.t, mostly lines 195 and 223, sometimes line 167 and 252 Not a regression Only on Solaris and once on RHEL 6 110 failed test runs (out of 120 on Solaris) Test checks log contents. Could be false positive due to logs written to NFS. c t/modules/sed.t line 37 test 3 91 times Solaris 10, 12 times RHEL 9, 6 times SLES 11 At least two cases I checked were "(12)Cannot allocate memory" (Linux) resp. "(12)Not enough space:" (Solaris). d A couple of tests fail for OpenSSL 0.9.8 based server when tested with a OpenSSL 3.0.0 based client: - t/modules/proxy_websockets_ssl.t - t/protocol/echo.t - t/security/CVE-2005-2700.t - t/security/CVE-2009-3555.t - t/ssl/basicauth.t - t/ssl/env.t - t/ssl/extlookup.t - t/ssl/fakeauth.t - t/ssl/headers.t - t/ssl/ocsp.t - t/ssl/pr12355.t - t/ssl/pr43738.t - t/ssl/proxy.t - t/ssl/require.t - t/ssl/varlookup.t - t/ssl/verify.t That might be expected due to the behavior of the 3.0 default security level (not investigated) Regards, Rainer > The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: > sha256: c687b99c446c0ef345e7d86c21a8e15fc074b7d5152c4fe22b0463e2be346ffb *httpd-2.4.54-rc3.tar.gz > sha512: e9599df48a73b07b3a11dd44db2c22a671e8a41cdd5021bb434bbcde39d6fc498d165d9b0c4ed2b66a6321d9760b031c1c1c84c23661dbf44c42c52f637ec4dd *httpd-2.4.54-rc3.tar.gz > > The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.54-rc3-candidate. > > Kind Regards, > Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as httpd-2.4.54
With 9 +1 the voting is complete and I will make the release now. Thanks everyone for testing! Kind Regards, Stefan > Am 08.06.2022 um 09:04 schrieb Petr Gajdos : > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:25:31PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote: > [x] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > > SLE 15sp4, openSUSE 15.4,Tumbleweed > > -- > Have a lot of fun!
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as httpd-2.4.54
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:25:31PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote: [x] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! SLE 15sp4, openSUSE 15.4,Tumbleweed -- Have a lot of fun!
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as httpd-2.4.54
On 6/7/22 12:02, Stefan Eissing wrote: > Seems a lot of people are either on vacation or busy - and that is fine. > > Since the rc* candidates merely differed on the TCP_FLUSH defines, I tend > to count all positive votes as still applicable! > +1 Fedora 36, OpenBSD 7.1 and OpenBSD-current. Giovanni > Otherwise, speak up! > > Kind Regards, > Stefan > >> Am 07.06.2022 um 12:00 schrieb Stefan Eissing : >> >> +1 from me on my macOS machine. >> >>> Am 07.06.2022 um 10:58 schrieb Joe Orton : >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:25:31PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote: Here we go again! Sorry for the repeats, but that is why we build candidates, right? Hi all, Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as 2.4.54: [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: sha256: c687b99c446c0ef345e7d86c21a8e15fc074b7d5152c4fe22b0463e2be346ffb *httpd-2.4.54-rc3.tar.gz sha512: e9599df48a73b07b3a11dd44db2c22a671e8a41cdd5021bb434bbcde39d6fc498d165d9b0c4ed2b66a6321d9760b031c1c1c84c23661dbf44c42c52f637ec4dd *httpd-2.4.54-rc3.tar.gz >>> >>> +1 for release, passes tests on Fedora 36, RHEL 8 & 9 (x86_64 only). >>> >>> One note: on F36 I had to manually add a route for the multicast range >>> to get t/modules/heartbeat.t to pass, which I guess is a change in the >>> default network configuration compared to earlier Fedora releases. >>> >>> Thanks for RMing! (x3) >>> >>> Regards, Joe >>> >> > OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as httpd-2.4.54
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 6:04 AM Stefan Eissing wrote: > > Seems a lot of people are either on vacation or busy - and that is fine. > > Since the rc* candidates merely differed on the TCP_FLUSH defines, I tend > to count all positive votes as still applicable! +1 aix/xlc/ppc64
Re[: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as httpd-2.4.54
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:25:31PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote: Here we go again! Sorry for the repeats, but that is why we build candidates, right? Hi all, Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as 2.4.54: [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: sha256: c687b99c446c0ef345e7d86c21a8e15fc074b7d5152c4fe22b0463e2be346ffb *httpd-2.4.54-rc3.tar.gz sha512: e9599df48a73b07b3a11dd44db2c22a671e8a41cdd5021bb434bbcde39d6fc498d165d9b0c4ed2b66a6321d9760b031c1c1c84c23661dbf44c42c52f637ec4dd *httpd-2.4.54-rc3.tar.gz +1 on my Debian 11 x64
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as httpd-2.4.54
+1 All looks fine on Windows. > Op 6 jun. 2022 om 16:25 heeft Stefan Eissing het > volgende geschreven: > > Here we go again! Sorry for the repeats, but that is why we build > candidates, right? > > Hi all, > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as 2.4.54: > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > > The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: > sha256: c687b99c446c0ef345e7d86c21a8e15fc074b7d5152c4fe22b0463e2be346ffb > *httpd-2.4.54-rc3.tar.gz > sha512: > e9599df48a73b07b3a11dd44db2c22a671e8a41cdd5021bb434bbcde39d6fc498d165d9b0c4ed2b66a6321d9760b031c1c1c84c23661dbf44c42c52f637ec4dd > *httpd-2.4.54-rc3.tar.gz > > The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.54-rc3-candidate. > > Kind Regards, > Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as httpd-2.4.54
> Am 07.06.2022 um 12:21 schrieb Yann Ylavic : > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 4:25 PM Stefan Eissing wrote: >> >> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release >> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as 2.4.54: > > [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > > All good on Linux Debian(s). > > Thanks Stefan for RMing! :) If no negative votes come in, I will make the release tomorrow morning. Cheers, Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as httpd-2.4.54
On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 4:25 PM Stefan Eissing wrote: > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as 2.4.54: [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! All good on Linux Debian(s). Thanks Stefan for RMing!
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as httpd-2.4.54
Seems a lot of people are either on vacation or busy - and that is fine. Since the rc* candidates merely differed on the TCP_FLUSH defines, I tend to count all positive votes as still applicable! Otherwise, speak up! Kind Regards, Stefan > Am 07.06.2022 um 12:00 schrieb Stefan Eissing : > > +1 from me on my macOS machine. > >> Am 07.06.2022 um 10:58 schrieb Joe Orton : >> >> On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:25:31PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote: >>> Here we go again! Sorry for the repeats, but that is why we build >>> candidates, right? >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >>> >>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release >>> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as 2.4.54: >>> [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! >>> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. >>> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. >>> >>> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: >>> sha256: c687b99c446c0ef345e7d86c21a8e15fc074b7d5152c4fe22b0463e2be346ffb >>> *httpd-2.4.54-rc3.tar.gz >>> sha512: >>> e9599df48a73b07b3a11dd44db2c22a671e8a41cdd5021bb434bbcde39d6fc498d165d9b0c4ed2b66a6321d9760b031c1c1c84c23661dbf44c42c52f637ec4dd >>> *httpd-2.4.54-rc3.tar.gz >> >> +1 for release, passes tests on Fedora 36, RHEL 8 & 9 (x86_64 only). >> >> One note: on F36 I had to manually add a route for the multicast range >> to get t/modules/heartbeat.t to pass, which I guess is a change in the >> default network configuration compared to earlier Fedora releases. >> >> Thanks for RMing! (x3) >> >> Regards, Joe >> >
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as httpd-2.4.54
+1 from me on my macOS machine. > Am 07.06.2022 um 10:58 schrieb Joe Orton : > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:25:31PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote: >> Here we go again! Sorry for the repeats, but that is why we build >> candidates, right? >> >> Hi all, >> >> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >> >> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release >> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as 2.4.54: >> [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! >> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. >> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. >> >> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: >> sha256: c687b99c446c0ef345e7d86c21a8e15fc074b7d5152c4fe22b0463e2be346ffb >> *httpd-2.4.54-rc3.tar.gz >> sha512: >> e9599df48a73b07b3a11dd44db2c22a671e8a41cdd5021bb434bbcde39d6fc498d165d9b0c4ed2b66a6321d9760b031c1c1c84c23661dbf44c42c52f637ec4dd >> *httpd-2.4.54-rc3.tar.gz > > +1 for release, passes tests on Fedora 36, RHEL 8 & 9 (x86_64 only). > > One note: on F36 I had to manually add a route for the multicast range > to get t/modules/heartbeat.t to pass, which I guess is a change in the > default network configuration compared to earlier Fedora releases. > > Thanks for RMing! (x3) > > Regards, Joe >
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as httpd-2.4.54
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:25:31PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote: > Here we go again! Sorry for the repeats, but that is why we build candidates, > right? > > Hi all, > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as 2.4.54: > [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > > The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: > sha256: c687b99c446c0ef345e7d86c21a8e15fc074b7d5152c4fe22b0463e2be346ffb > *httpd-2.4.54-rc3.tar.gz > sha512: > e9599df48a73b07b3a11dd44db2c22a671e8a41cdd5021bb434bbcde39d6fc498d165d9b0c4ed2b66a6321d9760b031c1c1c84c23661dbf44c42c52f637ec4dd > *httpd-2.4.54-rc3.tar.gz +1 for release, passes tests on Fedora 36, RHEL 8 & 9 (x86_64 only). One note: on F36 I had to manually add a route for the multicast range to get t/modules/heartbeat.t to pass, which I guess is a change in the default network configuration compared to earlier Fedora releases. Thanks for RMing! (x3) Regards, Joe
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as httpd-2.4.54
Stefan Eissing in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Mon, 6 Jun 2022 16:25:31 +0200): >I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release >this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as 2.4.54: >[x] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! No problems encountered on Windows (x64, VC15, OpenSSL 1.1.1). -- Jan
[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as httpd-2.4.54
Here we go again! Sorry for the repeats, but that is why we build candidates, right? Hi all, Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as 2.4.54: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: sha256: c687b99c446c0ef345e7d86c21a8e15fc074b7d5152c4fe22b0463e2be346ffb *httpd-2.4.54-rc3.tar.gz sha512: e9599df48a73b07b3a11dd44db2c22a671e8a41cdd5021bb434bbcde39d6fc498d165d9b0c4ed2b66a6321d9760b031c1c1c84c23661dbf44c42c52f637ec4dd *httpd-2.4.54-rc3.tar.gz The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.54-rc3-candidate. Kind Regards, Stefan
