AW: AW: PR 37145
ok i have to apologize again. there are so many mails and i just cant read them all. could you please tell me (i am shure you have done this before .-) if this patch 37145 resolves that prob. we are using 2.0.55 and seem to have exactly this problem. jet it happend just a few times. we use mod_proxy only for script loadbalancing. not static sites. thx -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ruediger Pluem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2005 23:15 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: PR 37145 On 12/07/2005 09:48 PM, Matthias Behrens wrote: does this problem effect 2.0.55 too? AFAIK it does only affect 2.0.55 of the stable releases. It is a regression from 2.0.54 caused by the very much needed changes to mod_proxy to fix CVE-2005-2088. Regards Rüdiger
Re: AW: AW: PR 37145
Matthias, he just said yes, the patch attached to PR 37145 is already been added and solves the problem, but needs to be backported for 2.0.56, which a few of us already vote +1 (yes) that it's a good solution. Apply the patch and you should no longer see these problems. They are most marked when running SSL. Bill Matthias Behrens wrote: ok i have to apologize again. there are so many mails and i just cant read them all. could you please tell me (i am shure you have done this before .-) if this patch 37145 resolves that prob. we are using 2.0.55 and seem to have exactly this problem. jet it happend just a few times. we use mod_proxy only for script loadbalancing. not static sites. thx -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ruediger Pluem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2005 23:15 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: PR 37145 On 12/07/2005 09:48 PM, Matthias Behrens wrote: does this problem effect 2.0.55 too? AFAIK it does only affect 2.0.55 of the stable releases. It is a regression from 2.0.54 caused by the very much needed changes to mod_proxy to fix CVE-2005-2088. Regards Rüdiger
AW: AW: PR 37145
i am sorry for the (how often was i sorry again)th time i scrambled this prob with the partial pages prob. thx matthias -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Matthias Behrens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Dezember 2005 11:09 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: AW: AW: PR 37145 ok i have to apologize again. there are so many mails and i just cant read them all. could you please tell me (i am shure you have done this before .-) if this patch 37145 resolves that prob. we are using 2.0.55 and seem to have exactly this problem. jet it happend just a few times. we use mod_proxy only for script loadbalancing. not static sites. thx -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ruediger Pluem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2005 23:15 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: PR 37145 On 12/07/2005 09:48 PM, Matthias Behrens wrote: does this problem effect 2.0.55 too? AFAIK it does only affect 2.0.55 of the stable releases. It is a regression from 2.0.54 caused by the very much needed changes to mod_proxy to fix CVE-2005-2088. Regards Rüdiger
AW: PR 37145
does this problem effect 2.0.55 too? -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ruediger Pluem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2005 21:44 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: PR 37145 Just a short reminder. I just got the 3rd duplicate for PR37145 ( data loss with httpd-2.0.55 reverse proxy method=post) and I remember myself that there had been additional cases that had been reported on the list. The patch is currently missing one vote for backport to 2.0.x. I know that 2.0.56 may be far off, but I just hit the drums because I want to ensure that it gets in. I remember that OtherBill tended to be positive about the patch and Joe agreed with the analysis + it is already part of 2.2.0 - The best Apache HTTP Server available. So to the ballot please :-). Regards Rüdiger
Re: AW: PR 37145
On 12/07/2005 09:48 PM, Matthias Behrens wrote: does this problem effect 2.0.55 too? AFAIK it does only affect 2.0.55 of the stable releases. It is a regression from 2.0.54 caused by the very much needed changes to mod_proxy to fix CVE-2005-2088. Regards Rüdiger
