Apache 1.3.21 tag this evening....
...after porting Bill Rowe's last mod_negotiation patch to 1.3. These showstoppers are in the STATUS file... Netware, OS2, and MPE may require gettid() and tid_t definitions in those platforms' os.h headers for mod_unique_id. Status: Win32 OK. Netware ??. OS2 ??. MPE ??. Security issues posted to the appropriate list. Status: some applied I believe both have been taken care of and will remove these from the STATUS file before tag if someone doesn;t beat me to it first. Will roll the tarball 24 hours from the tag to give time for some testing. Bill
Re: Apache 1.3.21 tag this evening....
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001 11:27:56 -0400, Bill Stoddard wrote: ...after porting Bill Rowe's last mod_negotiation patch to 1.3. These showstoppers are in the STATUS file... Netware, OS2, and MPE may require gettid() and tid_t definitions in those platforms' os.h headers for mod_unique_id. Status: Win32 OK. Netware ??. OS2 ??. MPE ??. gettid()? 1.3 on OS/2 is NOT multi-threaded. -- __ | Brian Havard | He is not the messiah! | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | He's a very naughty boy! - Life of Brian | --
Re: Apache 1.3.21 tag this evening....
#define for gettid() and tid_t have been added to os.h for NetWare Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:27:56 AM ..after porting Bill Rowe's last mod_negotiation patch to 1.3. These showstoppers are in the STATUS file... Netware, OS2, and MPE may require gettid() and tid_t definitions in those platforms' os.h headers for mod_unique_id. Status: Win32 OK. Netware ??. OS2 ??. MPE ??. Security issues posted to the appropriate list. Status: some applied I believe both have been taken care of and will remove these from the STATUS file before tag if someone doesn;t beat me to it first. Will roll the tarball 24 hours from the tag to give time for some testing. Bill
Re: Apache 1.3.21 tag this evening....
I've written an Announcement file for 1.3.21 and will commit within the hour (just got back from dentist) Mark
Re: Apache 1.3.21 tag this evening....
Doh --- sorry :) I'll pull that note.
Could all platforms crosscheck the mod_vhost_alias/mod_unique_id changes that
went in? The changes vhost_alias changes _should_ have no discernable effect
on any straight unix ('/' rooted) platform, and the unique_id changes should
only affect MULTITHREAD platforms.
Don't want to discover that I've broken this -after- the tag, I'd like to
fix any snafus beforehand.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Brian Havard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: Apache 1.3.21 tag this evening
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001 11:27:56 -0400, Bill Stoddard wrote:
...after porting Bill Rowe's last mod_negotiation patch to 1.3.
These showstoppers are in the STATUS file...
Netware, OS2, and MPE may require gettid() and tid_t definitions in
those platforms' os.h headers for mod_unique_id.
Status: Win32 OK. Netware ??. OS2 ??. MPE ??.
gettid()? 1.3 on OS/2 is NOT multi-threaded.
--
__
| Brian Havard | He is not the messiah! |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | He's a very naughty boy! - Life of Brian |
--
Re: Apache 1.3.21 tag this evening....
Is MPE actually a threaded server, or am I simply confused? Are there any MULTITHREAD unix ports, or is this only Win32 and Netware? Bill - Original Message - From: Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:51 AM Subject: Re: Apache 1.3.21 tag this evening #define for gettid() and tid_t have been added to os.h for NetWare Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:27:56 AM ..after porting Bill Rowe's last mod_negotiation patch to 1.3. These showstoppers are in the STATUS file... Netware, OS2, and MPE may require gettid() and tid_t definitions in those platforms' os.h headers for mod_unique_id. Status: Win32 OK. Netware ??. OS2 ??. MPE ??. Security issues posted to the appropriate list. Status: some applied I believe both have been taken care of and will remove these from the STATUS file before tag if someone doesn;t beat me to it first. Will roll the tarball 24 hours from the tag to give time for some testing. Bill
RE: Apache 1.3.21 tag this evening....
MPE is still 1.3.x pre-fork only. As part of my day job, I will start a project in December to update the bundled Apache server within the MPE OS to the latest greatest 1.3.x version. If I have time, I may also investigate 2.x and threading. So far nobody has yet played with Apache 2.x on MPE to the best of my knowledge. - Mark B. (aka [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -Original Message- From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Apache 1.3.21 tag this evening Is MPE actually a threaded server, or am I simply confused?
RE: Apache 1.3.21 tag this evening....
I'm hitting a fatal compilation error on TPF with some accept mutex code what was added. I was unaware of these changes but believe it was part of the make-accept-mutex-method-runtime patch. (I didn't realize the changes affected TPF-specific code until today.) I think I have a fix but won't be able to test it for several hours (7pm Eastern Time). Can the tag wait until I've tested and submitted this fix? -David
Re: Apache 1.3.21 tag this evening....
I'll hold off on the tag for a few hours more. Bill - Original Message - From: David McCreedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:17 PM Subject: RE: Apache 1.3.21 tag this evening I'm hitting a fatal compilation error on TPF with some accept mutex code what was added. I was unaware of these changes but believe it was part of the make-accept-mutex-method-runtime patch. (I didn't realize the changes affected TPF-specific code until today.) I think I have a fix but won't be able to test it for several hours (7pm Eastern Time). Can the tag wait until I've tested and submitted this fix? -David
