Re: Are you shure about this?
Paul Querna wrote: To my surprise several people just expressed the opinion that LUA should be part of the apache core in the long run. Could you explain for what purposes you want to do this? Because its fun. Do you know where to find LUA developer resources? One thing I could never find for years was CVS or SVN. I might be looking at the wrong places. Does something like that exist? Regards, Mladen.
Re: Are you shure about this?
Am Freitag, den 10.11.2006, 15:34 -0800 schrieb Paul Querna: > Joachim Zobel wrote: > > Writing apache modules? > > Nope. Right in the core. I would suspect it will work best as a 'logic' > control type thing, driving how a request is handled, and handling > complex configuration logic. So you want a higher level language because doing said things in C is no fun. You could have moved those parts to C++ years ago. But the higher level feature I have missed most (besides reasonable string handling) when doing apache modules in C is the ability to dynamically create functions. Thats the point, right? Sincerely, Joachim
Re: Are you shure about this?
Joachim Zobel wrote: > Hi. > > To my surprise several people just expressed the opinion that LUA should > be part of the apache core in the long run. Could you explain for what > purposes you want to do this? Because its fun. > Writing apache modules? Nope. Right in the core. I would suspect it will work best as a 'logic' control type thing, driving how a request is handled, and handling complex configuration logic. -Paul
Are you shure about this?
Hi. To my surprise several people just expressed the opinion that LUA should be part of the apache core in the long run. Could you explain for what purposes you want to do this? Writing apache modules? Also I would actually like to have a scripting language (for DOM manipultion in the libxml2 wrapper I am doing) for my purposes too, it somehow "feels wrong". Sincerely, Joachim
