Re: CVS to SVN conversion

[Joe Orton]

On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 10:41:38AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I would like to publicly THANK Sander and Justin for their
> tireless (well, not literally tireless, because they worked
> so long that they were *very* tired) work in doing the
> conversion!
> 
> I think during AC2004 everyone settled their beer scores,
> but Sander and Justin *definitely* are once again in the
> "I owe you" category :)

I want to second that too.  The difference it makes to be able to "svn
diff" and "svn st" without sending packets round the world a few times
is just immense, it really makes the development process more enjoyable.
Thank you thank you thank you!

joe

Re: CVS to SVN conversion

[Sander Striker]

On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 11:04, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Friday, November 19, 2004 7:57 PM +0100 André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> 
> > Looks basically fine. I'm wondering a bit about the tags directory,
> > especially the 1.3 subdir. Is it necessary, is there something broken?
> 
> Just to be clear, Sander's email that you are replying to was an artifact 
> of the busted network at Alexis Park.

Indeed, others will find they have received 'out-of-date' mail from me
as well.

> The conversion is now complete and live at:
> 
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/
> 
> Sander should be following up with detailed instructions soon-ish.  But, 
> alas, I think he fell asleep at the keyboard once again this morning.  ;-)

*blush*

The instructions ended up not to be so detailed, but hey :)

> Regarding the tags/1.3 subdir, those are the complete tags for the 1.3 
> series.  Our conversion got royally messed up due to the docs files as they 
> contain overlapping tags with the 1.3 repository.  So, I've cleared out 
> most of the bogus tags in the tags/ directory and I need to move all of the 
> 'real' 1.3 tags into the tags/ dir.

Thanks again Justin,

Sander

Re: CVS to SVN conversion

[Justin Erenkrantz]

--On Friday, November 19, 2004 7:57 PM +0100 André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

Looks basically fine. I'm wondering a bit about the tags directory,
especially the 1.3 subdir. Is it necessary, is there something broken?
Just to be clear, Sander's email that you are replying to was an artifact 
of the busted network at Alexis Park.  The conversion is now complete and 
live at:

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/
Sander should be following up with detailed instructions soon-ish.  But, 
alas, I think he fell asleep at the keyboard once again this morning.  ;-)

Regarding the tags/1.3 subdir, those are the complete tags for the 1.3 
series.  Our conversion got royally messed up due to the docs files as they 
contain overlapping tags with the 1.3 repository.  So, I've cleared out 
most of the bogus tags in the tags/ directory and I need to move all of the 
'real' 1.3 tags into the tags/ dir.

I hope that makes some sense - if not, take a look at the repository in 
about 24-48 hours and it'll make more sense...  =)  -- justin

Re: CVS to SVN conversion

[André Malo]

* Sander Striker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi again,
> 
> The actual load seems to be working now (save the documentation...).
> Given that this wasn't a smooth ride, we've loaded things in the
> test repository.  Please take a look at it:
> 
>   http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/httpd/
> 
> If noone raises any issues we'll load it in the main repository in
> 36 hours.

Looks basically fine. I'm wondering a bit about the tags directory, especially
the 1.3 subdir. Is it necessary, is there something broken?

nd
-- 
"Das Verhalten von Gates hatte mir bewiesen, dass ich auf ihn und seine
beiden Gefährten nicht zu zählen brauchte" -- Karl May, "Winnetou III"

Im Westen was neues: 

Re: CVS to SVN conversion

[André Malo]

* Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I would like to publicly THANK Sander and Justin for their
> tireless (well, not literally tireless, because they worked
> so long that they were *very* tired) work in doing the
> conversion!
> 
> I think during AC2004 everyone settled their beer scores,
> but Sander and Justin *definitely* are once again in the
> "I owe you" category :)

ACK!

nd
-- 
Winnetous Erbe: 

Re: CVS to SVN conversion

[Jim Jagielski]

On Nov 17, 2004, at 4:45 PM, Sander Striker wrote:
Hi again,
The actual load seems to be working now (save the documentation...).
Given that this wasn't a smooth ride, we've loaded things in the
test repository.  Please take a look at it:
  http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/httpd/
If noone raises any issues we'll load it in the main repository in
36 hours.

I would like to publicly THANK Sander and Justin for their
tireless (well, not literally tireless, because they worked
so long that they were *very* tired) work in doing the
conversion!
I think during AC2004 everyone settled their beer scores,
but Sander and Justin *definitely* are once again in the
"I owe you" category :)

CVS to SVN conversion

[Sander Striker]

Hi again,

The actual load seems to be working now (save the documentation...).
Given that this wasn't a smooth ride, we've loaded things in the
test repository.  Please take a look at it:

  http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/httpd/

If noone raises any issues we'll load it in the main repository in
36 hours.

Sander