Re: Main httpd web site page: update needed for 2.2.13
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: > all, > Guenter Knauf schrieb: >> good idea! Based on this here modified samples: >> http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/releases.txt >> http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/main_index.txt >> and final result: >> http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/main_index.html > before it again vanishes from radar - should I proceed and check-in the > SSI stuff into svn? should be easy to revert if it turns out as bad, or? Not that I have anything to say on this but I agree with the if it's bad, you can revert so I say go for it. > > Gün. > > > > >
Re: Main httpd web site page: update needed for 2.2.13
On 08/11/2009 07:40 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: > all, > Guenter Knauf schrieb: >> good idea! Based on this here modified samples: >> http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/releases.txt >> http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/main_index.txt >> and final result: >> http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/main_index.html > before it again vanishes from radar - should I proceed and check-in the > SSI stuff into svn? should be easy to revert if it turns out as bad, or? Give it another 24 hours and if no one screams just do it. Please update the "How do we make it public?" at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/release.html so that this is documented accordingly for future RM's. Regards Rüdiger
Re: Main httpd web site page: update needed for 2.2.13
all, Guenter Knauf schrieb: > good idea! Based on this here modified samples: > http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/releases.txt > http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/main_index.txt > and final result: > http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/main_index.html before it again vanishes from radar - should I proceed and check-in the SSI stuff into svn? should be easy to revert if it turns out as bad, or? Gün.
Re: Main httpd web site page: update needed for 2.2.13
Hi, Rainer Jung schrieb: > +1 > > It would also apply to the download page, and the vars could even be put > in a small separate file included with #include, so being shared by > index and download. good idea! Based on this here modified samples: http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/releases.txt http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/main_index.txt and final result: http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/main_index.html Gün.
Re: Main httpd web site page: update needed for 2.2.13
On 08/10/2009 07:22 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Am 10.08.2009 17:16, schrieb Guenter Knauf: >> Hi, >> Rainer Jung schrieb: >>> I noticed there was still a 2.2.12 in a section heading of the httpd >>> landing page. I updated in svn: >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=802660 >>> >>> Could someone with karma on people.apache.org please update >>> /x1/www/httpd.apache.org >>> from svn? >>> >>> Unfortunately Bill has group ownership for the erroneous file (and two >>> other files), so I will post to infra about changing to the httpd group. >> since these sorts of oversights happened already often in the past I >> thought I suggest that we use a nice feature of our Apache server = SSI >> for this page. I've tested that this works fine: >> http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/main_index.html >> and here's the source view: >> http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/main_index.txt >> >> so for future releases its only necessary to change the version number >> in one place: >> >> >> >> >> thoughts? > > +1 > > It would also apply to the download page, and the vars could even be put > in a small separate file included with #include, so being shared by > index and download. > > Some files in the dev/ sub directory already use SSI, so it is active on > httpd.a.o. Given that it seems to make sense +1. Regards Rüdiger
Re: Main httpd web site page: update needed for 2.2.13
Am 10.08.2009 17:16, schrieb Guenter Knauf: Hi, Rainer Jung schrieb: I noticed there was still a 2.2.12 in a section heading of the httpd landing page. I updated in svn: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=802660 Could someone with karma on people.apache.org please update /x1/www/httpd.apache.org from svn? Unfortunately Bill has group ownership for the erroneous file (and two other files), so I will post to infra about changing to the httpd group. since these sorts of oversights happened already often in the past I thought I suggest that we use a nice feature of our Apache server = SSI for this page. I've tested that this works fine: http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/main_index.html and here's the source view: http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/main_index.txt so for future releases its only necessary to change the version number in one place: thoughts? +1 It would also apply to the download page, and the vars could even be put in a small separate file included with #include, so being shared by index and download. Some files in the dev/ sub directory already use SSI, so it is active on httpd.a.o. Regards, Rainer
Re: Main httpd web site page: update needed for 2.2.13
On Aug 10, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: Am 10.08.2009 17:47, schrieb Lars Eilebrecht: Rainer Jung wrote: I noticed there was still a 2.2.12 in a section heading of the httpd landing page. I updated in svn: BTW, the download page actually talks about the release of 2.2.18. That's already fixed in svn, but also needs svn up on people.apache.org. I ran svn up just now. Next rsync run should catch it: I saw the updates come in. S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Main httpd web site page: update needed for 2.2.13
Am 10.08.2009 17:47, schrieb Lars Eilebrecht: Rainer Jung wrote: I noticed there was still a 2.2.12 in a section heading of the httpd landing page. I updated in svn: BTW, the download page actually talks about the release of 2.2.18. That's already fixed in svn, but also needs svn up on people.apache.org.
Re: Main httpd web site page: update needed for 2.2.13
Am 10.08.2009 17:28, schrieb William A. Rowe, Jr.: Rainer Jung wrote: On 10.08.2009 08:01, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi, I noticed there was still a 2.2.12 in a section heading of the httpd landing page. I updated in svn: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=802660 Could someone with karma on people.apache.org please update /x1/www/httpd.apache.org from svn? Unfortunately Bill has group ownership for the erroneous file (and two other files), so I will post to infra about changing to the httpd group. Infra fixed the rights, so now everyone with "httpd" group membership can update. Please go ahead. Since you have group write rights to the containing directory, e.g. /www/httpd.apache.org/ - you can simply delete such files out of the way, and then svn up them again. No, I'm not a member of the httpd group. I'm not exactly sure, how the project distributes those rights. I have commit access to htpd svn, but my unix groups show: rjung apcvs member apsite tomcat The file is still wrong on people.apache.org. Regards, Rainer
Re: Main httpd web site page: update needed for 2.2.13
Rainer Jung wrote: > I noticed there was still a 2.2.12 in a section heading of the httpd > landing page. I updated in svn: BTW, the download page actually talks about the release of 2.2.18. ciao... -- Lars Eilebrecht l...@eilebrecht.net
Re: Main httpd web site page: update needed for 2.2.13
Rainer Jung wrote: > On 10.08.2009 08:01, Rainer Jung wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I noticed there was still a 2.2.12 in a section heading of the httpd >> landing page. I updated in svn: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=802660 >> >> Could someone with karma on people.apache.org please update >>/x1/www/httpd.apache.org >> from svn? >> >> Unfortunately Bill has group ownership for the erroneous file (and two >> other files), so I will post to infra about changing to the httpd group. > > Infra fixed the rights, so now everyone with "httpd" group membership > can update. Please go ahead. Since you have group write rights to the containing directory, e.g. /www/httpd.apache.org/ - you can simply delete such files out of the way, and then svn up them again. Sorry about that, no clue what happened.
Re: Main httpd web site page: update needed for 2.2.13
Hi, Rainer Jung schrieb: > I noticed there was still a 2.2.12 in a section heading of the httpd > landing page. I updated in svn: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=802660 > > Could someone with karma on people.apache.org please update >/x1/www/httpd.apache.org > from svn? > > Unfortunately Bill has group ownership for the erroneous file (and two > other files), so I will post to infra about changing to the httpd group. since these sorts of oversights happened already often in the past I thought I suggest that we use a nice feature of our Apache server = SSI for this page. I've tested that this works fine: http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/main_index.html and here's the source view: http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testhttpd/main_index.txt so for future releases its only necessary to change the version number in one place: thoughts?
Re: Main httpd web site page: update needed for 2.2.13
On 10.08.2009 08:01, Rainer Jung wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed there was still a 2.2.12 in a section heading of the httpd > landing page. I updated in svn: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=802660 > > Could someone with karma on people.apache.org please update >/x1/www/httpd.apache.org > from svn? > > Unfortunately Bill has group ownership for the erroneous file (and two > other files), so I will post to infra about changing to the httpd group. Infra fixed the rights, so now everyone with "httpd" group membership can update. Please go ahead. Thanks, Rainer
Main httpd web site page: update needed for 2.2.13
Hi, I noticed there was still a 2.2.12 in a section heading of the httpd landing page. I updated in svn: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=802660 Could someone with karma on people.apache.org please update /x1/www/httpd.apache.org from svn? Unfortunately Bill has group ownership for the erroneous file (and two other files), so I will post to infra about changing to the httpd group. Regards, Rainer
