Re: More code cleanups...

2005-11-10 Thread Brad Nicholes 
  I don't anticipate the NetWare code ever being built with GCC, but who
knows what could happen.  It's mainly an NLM linker issue.  I am fine
with converting // commenting to standard C comment style.  At the very
least, we maintain style consistency.

Brad

>>> On 11/10/2005 at 10:32:10 am, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> In the Netware, OS2 and Win sections, there is prevalent use
>> of '//' commenting... Should we convert them to real C comment
style?
> 
> Certainly we can - as all three have the potential to be built with
gcc
> toolchains rather than their native compilers.  Right now I think
all
> three mostly build the 'unix flavor' when built with ./configure,
but
> if anyone tries to build the 'platform flavor' and hits these speed
> bumps, it would be disheartening.
> 
> Bill

Re: More code cleanups...

2005-11-10 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr. 

Jim Jagielski wrote:

In the Netware, OS2 and Win sections, there is prevalent use
of '//' commenting... Should we convert them to real C comment style?


Certainly we can - as all three have the potential to be built with gcc
toolchains rather than their native compilers.  Right now I think all
three mostly build the 'unix flavor' when built with ./configure, but
if anyone tries to build the 'platform flavor' and hits these speed
bumps, it would be disheartening.

Bill

More code cleanups...

2005-11-10 Thread Jim Jagielski 

In the Netware, OS2 and Win sections, there is prevalent use
of '//' commenting... Should we convert them to real C comment style?