Re: Named shared memory on macOS Monterey
Yep. If I build APR w/ --enable-posix-shm all tests pass just fine. Otherwise I run into errors where, when creating the shared memory segments, we run out (NOSPC) > On May 18, 2022, at 8:15 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > > Is this what breaks the test framework with heartmonitor loaded? I've > lost the errors, ended up commenting out the mod and re-running > Makefiles.PL to get unblocked. > > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 3:26 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> Anyone else notice that the later version of macOS really prefer >> that APR use posix for shared memory for both anon and name-based, >> instead of posix for anon and sysv/ipc for name? >> >> The issue seems to be that the kernel params are much lower than >> previous versions as well as it being nigh-impossible to reset >> those sysctl params on each boot, due to SIP. >> >> Shouldn't we prefer posix over sysv in any case? > > > > -- > Eric Covener > cove...@gmail.com
Re: Named shared memory on macOS Monterey
Is this what breaks the test framework with heartmonitor loaded? I've lost the errors, ended up commenting out the mod and re-running Makefiles.PL to get unblocked. On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 3:26 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Anyone else notice that the later version of macOS really prefer > that APR use posix for shared memory for both anon and name-based, > instead of posix for anon and sysv/ipc for name? > > The issue seems to be that the kernel params are much lower than > previous versions as well as it being nigh-impossible to reset > those sysctl params on each boot, due to SIP. > > Shouldn't we prefer posix over sysv in any case? -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
Named shared memory on macOS Monterey
Anyone else notice that the later version of macOS really prefer that APR use posix for shared memory for both anon and name-based, instead of posix for anon and sysv/ipc for name? The issue seems to be that the kernel params are much lower than previous versions as well as it being nigh-impossible to reset those sysctl params on each boot, due to SIP. Shouldn't we prefer posix over sysv in any case?
