Re: (resend) RE: mod_ssl
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:50:46PM -0500, Hammer, Tim wrote: I am attempting to upgrade httpd from 1.3.x to 2.2.x for our web application. I have managed to get everything building and working, ... As you can see, the call from mod_ssl.so into the buckets/ code is passing a null pointer. None of our other modules have been modified to use buckets. Does mod_ssl require the use of buckets? Are you trying to port mod_ssl from 1.3.x to 2.2.x? That's been done long ago and 2.x includes a port of mod_ssl. vh Mads Toftum -- http://soulfood.dk
RE: (resend) RE: mod_ssl
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:50:46PM -0500, Hammer, Tim wrote: I am attempting to upgrade httpd from 1.3.x to 2.2.x for our web application. I have managed to get everything building and working, ... As you can see, the call from mod_ssl.so into the buckets/ code is passing a null pointer. None of our other modules have been modified to use buckets. Does mod_ssl require the use of buckets? Are you trying to port mod_ssl from 1.3.x to 2.2.x? That's been done long ago and 2.x includes a port of mod_ssl. No, I am trying to use the new (2.2.x) mod_ssl with our modules that have been ported from 1.3.x to 2.2.x. However, the port did not convert our modules to use buckets and I am wondering if the new mod_ssl is requiring the content generator(s) (our modules) to have created a brigade. vh Mads Toftum .Tim Xerox Corporation, Office Group Phone: 585/427-1684 Fax: 585/427-3244 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Addr: M/S 0801-80A 1350 Jefferson Road Rochester, NY 14623 This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s) please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.
Re: (resend) RE: mod_ssl
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:01:09AM -0500, Hammer, Tim wrote: No, I am trying to use the new (2.2.x) mod_ssl with our modules that have been ported from 1.3.x to 2.2.x. However, the port did not convert our modules to use buckets and I am wondering if the new mod_ssl is requiring the content generator(s) (our modules) to have created a brigade. Ah. And everything works when mod_ssl is left out? vh Mads Toftum -- http://soulfood.dk
RE: (resend) RE: mod_ssl
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:01:09AM -0500, Hammer, Tim wrote: No, I am trying to use the new (2.2.x) mod_ssl with our modules that have been ported from 1.3.x to 2.2.x. However, the port did not convert our modules to use buckets and I am wondering if the new mod_ssl is requiring the content generator(s) (our modules) to have created a brigade. Ah. And everything works when mod_ssl is left out? Yes. .Tim Xerox Corporation, Office Group Phone: 585/427-1684 Fax: 585/427-3244 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Addr: M/S 0801-80A 1350 Jefferson Road Rochester, NY 14623 This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s) please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.