Re: can someone confirm or deny my interpretation of global mutices?

2003-11-04 Thread Jonathan Gold
indeed it does use APR_USE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZE. thanks for looking.

jon

On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Jeff Trawick wrote:

> Jonathan Gold wrote:
>
> > i'm not a great C programmer, but i think i understand, from the
> > comments on the method which creates the mutex, that an actual file is
> > used only if the operating system needs it to implement the locking.
>
> correct
>
> your Linux build is probably defaulting to SysV semaphores*, and mod_rewrite
> uses the default mutex type; thus, there is no file associated with that
> mod_rewrite mutex
>
> *verify by seeing if apachectl -V displays "-D APR_USE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZE"
>


Re: can someone confirm or deny my interpretation of global mutices?

2003-11-04 Thread Jeff Trawick
Jonathan Gold wrote:

i'm not a great C programmer, but i think i understand, from the
comments on the method which creates the mutex, that an actual file is
used only if the operating system needs it to implement the locking.
correct

your Linux build is probably defaulting to SysV semaphores*, and mod_rewrite 
uses the default mutex type; thus, there is no file associated with that 
mod_rewrite mutex

*verify by seeing if apachectl -V displays "-D APR_USE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZE"