Re: svn commit: r1000814 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/mpm/event/event.c

2010-10-14 Thread Greg Ames
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:


 Someone mentioned using 2.2 event in production on the list,today or
 yesterday, so I peeked at 2.2 and this bug appears to affect it.  Any
 interest out there in seeing what it takes to backport?


yes, I'd like to see it fixed on 2.2.

Greg


Re: svn commit: r1000814 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/mpm/event/event.c

2010-10-13 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:37 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
 On 10/12/2010 4:22 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:

 Someone mentioned using 2.2 event in production on the list,today or
 yesterday, so I peeked at 2.2 and this bug appears to affect it.  Any
 interest out there in seeing what it takes to backport?  (away from
 working env until tonight; dunno when wrowe is going to TR; dunno if
 anyone cares)

 2.0 docs/manual/ build.sh all (and build.bat all) is still giving me hassle,
 so let me know what you want to do with this.

Nobody spoke up as caring so far, so ignore it for your purposes.
There's always another one if I don't get a chance to play with 2.2.


Re: svn commit: r1000814 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/mpm/event/event.c

2010-10-13 Thread Igor Galić

- Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:37 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
 wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
  On 10/12/2010 4:22 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
 
  Someone mentioned using 2.2 event in production on the list,today
 or

That was me.

  yesterday, so I peeked at 2.2 and this bug appears to affect it.
  Any
  interest out there in seeing what it takes to backport?  (away
 from
  working env until tonight; dunno when wrowe is going to TR; dunno
 if
  anyone cares)

I do!

  2.0 docs/manual/ build.sh all (and build.bat all) is still giving me
 hassle,
  so let me know what you want to do with this.
 
 Nobody spoke up as caring so far, so ignore it for your purposes.
 There's always another one if I don't get a chance to play with 2.2.

I didn't because I'm no dev.

-- 
Igor Galić

Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.ga...@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/


Re: svn commit: r1000814 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/mpm/event/event.c

2010-10-12 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 7:25 AM,  traw...@apache.org wrote:
 Author: trawick
 Date: Fri Sep 24 11:25:25 2010
 New Revision: 1000814

 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1000814view=rev
 Log:
 Fix crash accessing pollset on worker thread when child process is exiting.

 The timeout mutex and pollset were allocated from the listener thread
 pool.  During child process shutdown, the listener thread exits first
 while any outstanding requests finish.  These objects need to be allocated
 from pchild since the lifetime extends until the last worker thread has
 finished.

 Switch to pchild, and move init of these objects to the same place as
 other thread-independent objects.

Someone mentioned using 2.2 event in production on the list,today or
yesterday, so I peeked at 2.2 and this bug appears to affect it.  Any
interest out there in seeing what it takes to backport?  (away from
working env until tonight; dunno when wrowe is going to TR; dunno if
anyone cares)


Re: svn commit: r1000814 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES server/mpm/event/event.c

2010-10-12 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 10/12/2010 4:22 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
 
 Someone mentioned using 2.2 event in production on the list,today or
 yesterday, so I peeked at 2.2 and this bug appears to affect it.  Any
 interest out there in seeing what it takes to backport?  (away from
 working env until tonight; dunno when wrowe is going to TR; dunno if
 anyone cares)

2.0 docs/manual/ build.sh all (and build.bat all) is still giving me hassle,
so let me know what you want to do with this.