;-) > Am 09.08.2019 um 10:30 schrieb rj...@apache.org: > > Author: rjung > Date: Fri Aug 9 08:30:21 2019 > New Revision: 1864774 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1864774&view=rev > Log: > ENOCOFFEE. > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1864774&r1=1864773&r2=1864774&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Fri Aug 9 08:30:21 2019 > @@ -164,8 +164,6 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: > trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1709121 > 2.4.x patch: svn merge -c 1709121 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk . > +1: covener, jorton, > - rjung: shouldn't the merging respect the "add" set flag? Otherwise it > seems > - impossible to merge a 0 value on top of a non-zero value. > > > PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE BEING WORKED > >