> On Oct 14, 2019, at 3:14 PM, jaillet...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: jailletc36 > Date: Mon Oct 14 19:14:04 2019 > New Revision: 1868456 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1868456&view=rev > Log: > Add a note > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1868456&r1=1868455&r2=1868456&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS Mon Oct 14 19:14:04 2019 > @@ -178,6 +178,11 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: > trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1867183 > 2.4.x patch: svn merge -c 1867183 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk . > +1: jim > + jailletc36: -0 > + I don't think that the #pragma black magic is of any help > with GCC > + and jim seems to still have problem with clang and > comments with //. > + See discussion at: > + > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/628cc54a1a345cb773d8e1be0639f8e75d2b481cf89232051c83b787@%3Cdev.httpd.apache.org%3E The problem still exists because this is NOT back ported yet. With this back port, the problem goes away.