Re: Re-assigning bugs, was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26149]...
On 16.01.2004, at 10:30, Joe Orton wrote: On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:45:01AM +0100, Erik Abele wrote: Is it really enough to change the component to re-assign a bug to another project? Shouldn't the 'Assigned To:' field be filled with the appropriate mailing list address? Yeah, you have to remember to select the "Reassign bug to owner of selected component" option when changing the component. Ha, I knew there was something... thanks, Joe. Cheers, Erik /me goes to look how much mis-owned bugs are in bugzilla ;)
Re: Re-assigning bugs, was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26149]...
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:45:01AM +0100, Erik Abele wrote: > On 15.01.2004, at 09:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26149 > > > >Apache 2.0.48 won't load Tomcat 4.1.29 in-process via JK2 > > > >--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-15 08:54 > >--- > >Changing to tomcat > > Is it really enough to change the component to re-assign a bug to > another project? Shouldn't the 'Assigned To:' field be filled with the > appropriate mailing list address? Yeah, you have to remember to select the "Reassign bug to owner of selected component" option when changing the component.
Re-assigning bugs, was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26149]...
On 15.01.2004, at 09:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26149 Apache 2.0.48 won't load Tomcat 4.1.29 in-process via JK2 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-15 08:54 --- Changing to tomcat Is it really enough to change the component to re-assign a bug to another project? Shouldn't the 'Assigned To:' field be filled with the appropriate mailing list address? Not sure, but I realized that this bug is still assigned to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and didn't show up on tomcat-dev@ (http://mail-archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/BrowseList? listId=46&count=67297). Hmm... Cheers, Erik