Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

2015-10-09 Thread Jim Jagielski 
The T will happen today around 1:30pm eastern, which is ~1.5hrs from
'now'...

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

2015-10-08 Thread Steffen 

Jus curious, why is e.g. LUA there ?

-Original Message- 
From: Jim Jagielski 
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2015 12:44 PM 
To: dev@httpd.apache.org 
Subject: ** Re: T of 2.4.17 this week 


Since we are not bundling them, we don't.


On Oct 7, 2015, at 6:40 PM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote:

Do we need in LICENSE.txt the license of nghttp2 (MIT) ?

Also missing there libxml2.
 
On Wednesday 07/10/2015 at 15:46, Jim Jagielski wrote: 

So the plan is to T sometime tomorrow, likely
later on in the afternoon, eastern time.

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

2015-10-08 Thread Jim Jagielski 
Since we are not bundling them, we don't.

> On Oct 7, 2015, at 6:40 PM, Steffen  wrote:
> 
> Do we need in LICENSE.txt the license of nghttp2 (MIT) ?
> 
> Also missing there libxml2.
>  
> On Wednesday 07/10/2015 at 15:46, Jim Jagielski wrote: 
>> So the plan is to T sometime tomorrow, likely
>> later on in the afternoon, eastern time.
> 
>

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

2015-10-08 Thread Jim Jagielski 
With the changes, I decided to wait a day and let things settle:
Will T tomorrow when I return from keynoting at Drupal Camp Baltimore.

> On Oct 7, 2015, at 9:45 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> So the plan is to T sometime tomorrow, likely
> later on in the afternoon, eastern time.

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

2015-10-08 Thread Gregg Smith 

On 10/8/2015 3:57 AM, Steffen wrote:

Jus curious, why is e.g. LUA there ?


Probably because when mod_lua was added it got added and not the case 
when mod_proxy_html and mod_xml2enc got added nor did I think about it 
when adding mod_h2. My fault.


This is beyond the scope of httpd's source and was originally for the 
old contributed binary distributions but I see no reason not to include 
them anyway.


Done for:
Trunk: r1707640
2.4.x: r1707641

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

2015-10-07 Thread Steffen 


Do we need in LICENSE.txt the license of nghttp2 (MIT) ?

Also missing there libxml2.


On Wednesday 07/10/2015 at 15:46, Jim Jagielski  wrote:

So the plan is to T sometime tomorrow, likely
later on in the afternoon, eastern time.

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

2015-10-07 Thread Jim Jagielski 
So the plan is to T sometime tomorrow, likely
later on in the afternoon, eastern time.

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

2015-10-06 Thread Daniel Gruno 
On 10/06/2015 02:01 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org
> <mailto:humbed...@apache.org>> wrote:
> 
> On 10/05/2015 06:35 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> > +1!
> > There's so much new goodness we have to share! :)
> >
> > On 10/5/2015, 5:54:04 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> >> I propose a T of 2.4.17 this week with a release for next. I
> >> will RM.
> >>
> >> Comments?
> >>
> 
> Also, if someone could verify that the tweaks I made to mod_lua makes it
> compile properly on Ubutnu 14.04 (with lua5.2-dev installed), that would
> be super swell!
> 
> 
> The build looks okay here, but I haven't tried any scripts...

Awesome, as long as the .so file gets built, I'm happy :)
Thanks for checking!

With regards,
Daniel.

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

2015-10-06 Thread Daniel Gruno 
On 10/05/2015 06:35 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> +1!
> There's so much new goodness we have to share! :)
> 
> On 10/5/2015, 5:54:04 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: 
>> I propose a T of 2.4.17 this week with a release for next. I
>> will RM.
>>
>> Comments?
>>

Also, if someone could verify that the tweaks I made to mod_lua makes it
compile properly on Ubutnu 14.04 (with lua5.2-dev installed), that would
be super swell!

With regards,
Daniel.

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

2015-10-06 Thread Jeff Trawick 
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote:

> On 10/05/2015 06:35 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> > +1!
> > There's so much new goodness we have to share! :)
> >
> > On 10/5/2015, 5:54:04 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> >> I propose a T of 2.4.17 this week with a release for next. I
> >> will RM.
> >>
> >> Comments?
> >>
>
> Also, if someone could verify that the tweaks I made to mod_lua makes it
> compile properly on Ubutnu 14.04 (with lua5.2-dev installed), that would
> be super swell!
>
>
The build looks okay here, but I haven't tried any scripts...

VERSION="14.04.3 LTS, Trusty Tahr"

liblua5.2-0:amd64 install
liblua5.2-dev:amd64 install

checking whether to enable mod_lua... checking dependencies
checking for pow in -lm... yes
checking for sqrt in -lm... yes
checking for lua.h in ./include/lua-5.2... no
checking for lua.h in ./include/lua5.2... no
checking for lua.h in ./include/lua52... no
checking for lua.h in ./include... no
checking for lua.h in ./include/lua-5.1... no
checking for lua.h in ./include/lua5.1... no
checking for lua.h in ./include/lua51... no
checking for lua.h in /usr/local/include/lua-5.2... no
checking for lua.h in /usr/local/include/lua5.2... no
checking for lua.h in /usr/local/include/lua52... no
checking for lua.h in /usr/local/include... no
checking for lua.h in /usr/local/include/lua-5.1... no
checking for lua.h in /usr/local/include/lua5.1... no
checking for lua.h in /usr/local/include/lua51... no
checking for lua.h in /usr/include/lua-5.2... no
checking for lua.h in /usr/include/lua5.2... yes
checking for luaL_newstate in -llua5.2... yes
configure: using '-L/usr/lib -llua5.2 -lm' for Lua Library
  setting MOD_INCLUDES to "-I/usr/include/lua5.2"
  setting MOD_LUA_LDADD to "-L/usr/lib -llua5.2 -lm"
checking whether to enable mod_lua... shared
  adding "-I$(top_srcdir)/modules/lua" to INCLUDES

(no compile warnings)

$ ~/inst/24-64/bin/apachectl -M | grep lua
 lua_module (shared)


With regards,
> Daniel.
>



-- 
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

2015-10-06 Thread olli hauer 
On 2015-10-05 23:07, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:30 PM, olli hauer  wrote:
>>
>> would you mind to look at #58126 ?
>>
>> It contains a simple patch for acinclude.m4 to suppress warnings about 
>> underquoted calls to AC_DEFUN.
> 
> Committed in r1706918, backport proposed in r1706923.
> 
> Regards,
> Yann.
> 

Thanks! :)

RE: T of 2.4.17 this week

2015-10-05 Thread Lu, Yingqi 
Thank you, Yann!

Regards,
Yingqi

-Original Message-
From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 11:38 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

Hi Yingqi,

this was done in r1705492, will be in 2.4.17.

Regards,
Yann.


On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Lu, Yingqi <yingqi...@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Can you please look and incorporate the SO_REUSEPORT patch for this release 
> as well?
>
> Thanks,
> Yingqi
>
> -Original Message-
> From: olli hauer [mailto:oha...@gmx.de]
> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 11:30 AM
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: T of 2.4.17 this week
>
> On 2015-10-05 17:54, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I propose a T of 2.4.17 this week with a release for next. I will 
>> RM.
>>
>> Comments?
>>
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> would you mind to look at #58126 ?
>
> It contains a simple patch for acinclude.m4 to suppress warnings about 
> underquoted calls to AC_DEFUN.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> olli

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

2015-10-05 Thread olli hauer 
On 2015-10-05 17:54, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I propose a T of 2.4.17 this week with a release for next. I
> will RM.
> 
> Comments?
> 

Hi Jim,

would you mind to look at #58126 ?

It contains a simple patch for acinclude.m4 to suppress warnings about 
underquoted calls to AC_DEFUN.

-- 
Thanks,
olli

RE: T of 2.4.17 this week

2015-10-05 Thread Lu, Yingqi 
Hi Jim,

Can you please look and incorporate the SO_REUSEPORT patch for this release as 
well?

Thanks,
Yingqi

-Original Message-
From: olli hauer [mailto:oha...@gmx.de] 
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 11:30 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

On 2015-10-05 17:54, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I propose a T of 2.4.17 this week with a release for next. I will 
> RM.
> 
> Comments?
> 

Hi Jim,

would you mind to look at #58126 ?

It contains a simple patch for acinclude.m4 to suppress warnings about 
underquoted calls to AC_DEFUN.

--
Thanks,
olli

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

2015-10-05 Thread Yann Ylavic 
Hi Yingqi,

this was done in r1705492, will be in 2.4.17.

Regards,
Yann.


On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Lu, Yingqi <yingqi...@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Can you please look and incorporate the SO_REUSEPORT patch for this release 
> as well?
>
> Thanks,
> Yingqi
>
> -Original Message-
> From: olli hauer [mailto:oha...@gmx.de]
> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 11:30 AM
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: T of 2.4.17 this week
>
> On 2015-10-05 17:54, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I propose a T of 2.4.17 this week with a release for next. I will
>> RM.
>>
>> Comments?
>>
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> would you mind to look at #58126 ?
>
> It contains a simple patch for acinclude.m4 to suppress warnings about 
> underquoted calls to AC_DEFUN.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> olli

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

2015-10-05 Thread Yann Ylavic 
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:30 PM, olli hauer  wrote:
>
> would you mind to look at #58126 ?
>
> It contains a simple patch for acinclude.m4 to suppress warnings about 
> underquoted calls to AC_DEFUN.

Committed in r1706918, backport proposed in r1706923.

Regards,
Yann.

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

2015-10-05 Thread Daniel Gruno 
+1!
There's so much new goodness we have to share! :)

On 10/5/2015, 5:54:04 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: 
> I propose a T of 2.4.17 this week with a release for next. I
> will RM.
> 
> Comments?
>

T of 2.4.17 this week

2015-10-05 Thread Jim Jagielski 
I propose a T of 2.4.17 this week with a release for next. I
will RM.

Comments?