Re: is anyone planning to TR httpd 2.2.18 real soon?

2011-05-07 Thread Jim Jagielski
I am, once the APR releases happen...

On May 6, 2011, at 8:47 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:

 lots of fixes ready in httpd; also expecting apr 1.4.3/apr-util 1.3.11
 to be pushed to the mirrors later today
 
 (oh, and 3 items in STATUS that need one more review)
 



Re: is anyone planning to TR httpd 2.2.18 real soon?

2011-05-07 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 5/7/2011 8:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
 I am, once the APR releases happen...

And as the clock rolls over, they are approved.  Although it will
take some time to sync up APR site and dist files, but nothing
preventing a release.  One report raised privately, which caused
me to hold off last night, turns out to be a non-issue.

Please feel free to beat me to it :)  I'm going ahead with a tag
and roll at 0400 GMT if no one else has done so for 2.2.18, and
then for 2.3.11 beta 24 hours after that if its still pending.




Re: is anyone planning to TR httpd 2.2.18 real soon?

2011-05-07 Thread Jim Jagielski

On May 7, 2011, at 6:46 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:

 On 5/7/2011 8:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
 I am, once the APR releases happen...
 
 And as the clock rolls over, they are approved.  Although it will
 take some time to sync up APR site and dist files, but nothing
 preventing a release.  One report raised privately, which caused
 me to hold off last night, turns out to be a non-issue.
 
 Please feel free to beat me to it :)  I'm going ahead with a tag
 and roll at 0400 GMT if no one else has done so for 2.2.18, and
 then for 2.3.11 beta 24 hours after that if its still pending.
 

Go ahead and do the 2.2 release and I'll do the 2.3 one...
I have a few outstanding patches to fold into 2.3 before
the release...



is anyone planning to TR httpd 2.2.18 real soon?

2011-05-06 Thread Jeff Trawick
lots of fixes ready in httpd; also expecting apr 1.4.3/apr-util 1.3.11
to be pushed to the mirrors later today

(oh, and 3 items in STATUS that need one more review)


Re: is anyone planning to TR httpd 2.2.18 real soon?

2011-05-06 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 5/6/2011 7:47 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
 lots of fixes ready in httpd; also expecting apr 1.4.3/apr-util 1.3.11
 to be pushed to the mirrors later today

Jim expressed interest, so if he has time today or tomorrow morning, that
would be great!  If not, I'd like to go ahead and TR this evening, say
about 6pm EDT, since I'd only have time through Saturday to spend testing
and building binaries.  Next week gets busy and short, and I'd rather we
all put this behind us before anyone is heading for Wicklow, so any of
our energies are focused entirely on polishing httpd 2.3.x.

 (oh, and 3 items in STATUS that need one more review)

Well that was quick :)  Only one more with an answer needed from Graham
to Jeff, and one other if Jim or Jeff want to bring back the STATUS backport
of FIFO vs LIFO with a +1 and pointers to relevant bugs/comment threads to
help folks vote on that patch.  But 2.2.18 looks pretty darned solid now.


Re: is anyone planning to TR httpd 2.2.18 real soon?

2011-05-06 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:48 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
 On 5/6/2011 7:47 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
 lots of fixes ready in httpd; also expecting apr 1.4.3/apr-util 1.3.11
 to be pushed to the mirrors later today

 Jim expressed interest, so if he has time today or tomorrow morning, that
 would be great!  If not, I'd like to go ahead and TR this evening, say
 about 6pm EDT, since I'd only have time through Saturday to spend testing
 and building binaries.  Next week gets busy and short, and I'd rather we
 all put this behind us before anyone is heading for Wicklow, so any of
 our energies are focused entirely on polishing httpd 2.3.x.

 (oh, and 3 items in STATUS that need one more review)

 Well that was quick :)  Only one more with an answer needed from Graham
 to Jeff, and one other if Jim or Jeff want to bring back the STATUS backport
 of FIFO vs LIFO with a +1 and pointers to relevant bugs/comment threads to
 help folks vote on that patch.  But 2.2.18 looks pretty darned solid now.

That patch is definitely interesting; I played with it a bit but
didn't come up with a reason to vote one way or another.