Re: setsockopt error
Sorry for the delayed reply. Yes, I am using apachectl. I just re-tested with the current source, and no longer get the error. On 25 Dec 2001 at 15:27, Aaron Bannert wrote: On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 02:46:08PM -0500, Don Hughes wrote: Apache2.0 If all of my vhosts are of the form: VirtualHost *:nn and if there is a Listen for a port (81) that does NOT appear in a VirtualHost directive, then I get: ... [crit] (88)Socket operation on non-socket: make_sock: for address [::]:81, setsockopt: (SO_REUSEADDR) How are you starting Apache? bin/apachectl? -aaron ...don...don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: setsockopt error
Don Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Apache2.0 If all of my vhosts are of the form: VirtualHost *:nn and if there is a Listen for a port (81) that does NOT appear in a VirtualHost directive, then I get: ... [crit] (88)Socket operation on non-socket: make_sock: for address [::]:81, setsockopt: (SO_REUSEADDR) I just hit the same error but for a different scenario. I changed the port number on my single Listen statement and then did apachectl restart. -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/ Born in Roswell... married an alien...
setsockopt error
Apache2.0 If all of my vhosts are of the form: VirtualHost *:nn and if there is a Listen for a port (81) that does NOT appear in a VirtualHost directive, then I get: ... [crit] (88)Socket operation on non-socket: make_sock: for address [::]:81, setsockopt: (SO_REUSEADDR) ...don [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: setsockopt error
On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 02:46:08PM -0500, Don Hughes wrote: Apache2.0 If all of my vhosts are of the form: VirtualHost *:nn and if there is a Listen for a port (81) that does NOT appear in a VirtualHost directive, then I get: ... [crit] (88)Socket operation on non-socket: make_sock: for address [::]:81, setsockopt: (SO_REUSEADDR) How are you starting Apache? bin/apachectl? -aaron
